Framing Multi-Stakeholder Value Propositions: A wicked problem lens

IF 1.6 Q3 MANAGEMENT Technology Innovation Management Review Pub Date : 2021-04-30 DOI:10.22215/timreview/1434
Y. M. Ooi, K. Husted
{"title":"Framing Multi-Stakeholder Value Propositions: A wicked problem lens","authors":"Y. M. Ooi, K. Husted","doi":"10.22215/timreview/1434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We use two dimensions of wicked problems involving complexity and complicatedness, and conduct a secondary analysis of seven technology venture case studies from Australia and New Zealand. We then categorise the configuration types of these firms' stakeholder value propositions in the context of their scale-up process. We contribute to the value proposition and business model development research streams by suggesting that the challenge of mediating value propositions that conflict can manifest itself in four types of configurations: easy, complicated, complex and wicked. Complicated and complex propositions are thorny, but with structures and processes in place, they can be adequately addressed. On the other hand, wicked propositions consist of many unknowns and require firms to collaborate with stakeholders to derive outcomes that align company scaling objective with stakeholder value propositions. The value of a thing is estimated from the advantages supposed to be derived from it, and depends very much upon time, place, and circumstances”","PeriodicalId":51569,"journal":{"name":"Technology Innovation Management Review","volume":"11 1","pages":"26-37"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology Innovation Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We use two dimensions of wicked problems involving complexity and complicatedness, and conduct a secondary analysis of seven technology venture case studies from Australia and New Zealand. We then categorise the configuration types of these firms' stakeholder value propositions in the context of their scale-up process. We contribute to the value proposition and business model development research streams by suggesting that the challenge of mediating value propositions that conflict can manifest itself in four types of configurations: easy, complicated, complex and wicked. Complicated and complex propositions are thorny, but with structures and processes in place, they can be adequately addressed. On the other hand, wicked propositions consist of many unknowns and require firms to collaborate with stakeholders to derive outcomes that align company scaling objective with stakeholder value propositions. The value of a thing is estimated from the advantages supposed to be derived from it, and depends very much upon time, place, and circumstances”
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
构建多方利益相关者的价值主张:一个邪恶的问题视角
我们使用了涉及复杂性和复杂性的两个维度的邪恶问题,并对来自澳大利亚和新西兰的七个技术风险案例进行了二次分析。然后,我们在扩大规模的过程中对这些公司的利益相关者价值主张的配置类型进行了分类。我们建议,调解冲突的价值主张的挑战可以表现为四种类型的配置:简单、复杂、复杂和邪恶,从而为价值主张和商业模式开发研究流做出贡献。复杂的命题是棘手的,但有了适当的结构和过程,它们就可以得到充分的解决。另一方面,邪恶的主张由许多未知因素组成,要求公司与利益相关者合作,以得出将公司规模目标与利益相关方价值主张相一致的结果。一件事的价值是根据它所带来的好处来估计的,在很大程度上取决于时间、地点和环境。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Employment of highly-skilled migrants during the pandemic: Focus on internal migration in Indonesia. Editorial: Blockchain and Digital Transformation Can Blockchain Improve Healthcare Management? Interview: Blockchain and Digital Transformation in Financial Services, Part I Coping with the Double-Edged Sword of Data-Sharing in Ecosystems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1