Deprescribing Antipsychotic Medications in Psychotic Disorders: How and Why?

Swapnil Gupta, S. Steingard, Elena Francesca Garcia, H. Fathy
{"title":"Deprescribing Antipsychotic Medications in Psychotic Disorders: How and Why?","authors":"Swapnil Gupta, S. Steingard, Elena Francesca Garcia, H. Fathy","doi":"10.2174/1573400514666180612092055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Standard guidelines for the management of chronic psychoses recommend the rapid initiation of treatment with antipsychotic medications (APs) and often, indefinite continuation. Ongoing treatment with APs is based primarily on evidence from AP discontinuation studies, which have several crucial flaws. Due to this equivocal evidence for continued treatment with APs and owing to their serious side effects, there is a critical need for considering controlled reduction and/or discontinuation of APs in persons with chronic psychoses. Discussion and Conclusion: Deprescribing has been defined as the systematic process of medication reduction and or discontinuation when current or potential harms outweigh current or potential benefits, taking into account a patient’s medical condition, functional status and their values and preferences. In this paper, we utilize the framework of deprescribing to answer the questions of why and how to reduce and/or discontinue treatment with APs. We first approach the complex issue of assessing the risk-benefit ratio of APs by examining the evidence for their continued benefit and their side effects. We emphasize deprescribing as a patient-centered process, using shared-decision making, psychosocial interventions and a flexible approach while prescribing. Finally, we present some of the limitations and challenges of using this approach in AP reduction and discontinuation.","PeriodicalId":51774,"journal":{"name":"Current Psychiatry Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/1573400514666180612092055","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Psychiatry Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573400514666180612092055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Standard guidelines for the management of chronic psychoses recommend the rapid initiation of treatment with antipsychotic medications (APs) and often, indefinite continuation. Ongoing treatment with APs is based primarily on evidence from AP discontinuation studies, which have several crucial flaws. Due to this equivocal evidence for continued treatment with APs and owing to their serious side effects, there is a critical need for considering controlled reduction and/or discontinuation of APs in persons with chronic psychoses. Discussion and Conclusion: Deprescribing has been defined as the systematic process of medication reduction and or discontinuation when current or potential harms outweigh current or potential benefits, taking into account a patient’s medical condition, functional status and their values and preferences. In this paper, we utilize the framework of deprescribing to answer the questions of why and how to reduce and/or discontinue treatment with APs. We first approach the complex issue of assessing the risk-benefit ratio of APs by examining the evidence for their continued benefit and their side effects. We emphasize deprescribing as a patient-centered process, using shared-decision making, psychosocial interventions and a flexible approach while prescribing. Finally, we present some of the limitations and challenges of using this approach in AP reduction and discontinuation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精神障碍的抗精神病药物处方:如何以及为什么?
背景:慢性精神病管理的标准指南建议快速开始使用抗精神病药物(AP)进行治疗,并且经常无限期地继续治疗。AP的持续治疗主要基于AP停药研究的证据,该研究存在几个关键缺陷。由于持续使用AP治疗的证据不明确,并且其副作用严重,因此迫切需要考虑在慢性精神病患者中控制减少和/或停止使用AP。讨论和结论:描述被定义为当当前或潜在的危害超过当前或潜在益处时,减少和/或停药的系统过程,同时考虑到患者的医疗状况、功能状态及其价值观和偏好。在本文中,我们利用描述的框架来回答为什么以及如何减少和/或停止AP治疗的问题。我们首先通过检查AP的持续益处及其副作用的证据来评估AP的风险效益比这一复杂问题。我们强调取消描述是一个以患者为中心的过程,在开处方时使用共享决策、心理社会干预和灵活的方法。最后,我们介绍了在AP减少和停用中使用这种方法的一些局限性和挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Current Psychiatry Reviews publishes frontier reviews on all the latest advances on clinical psychiatry and its related areas e.g. pharmacology, epidemiology, clinical care, and therapy. The journal’s aim is to publish the highest quality review articles dedicated to clinical research in the field. The journal is essential reading for all clinicians, psychiatrists and researchers in psychiatry.
期刊最新文献
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for the Treatment of Depressive Disorders: A Review of Clinical Applications Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Psychiatric Disorders Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Treatment of Auditory Hallucination: A Systematic Review of Clinical Efficacy Cognition is a Necessary Factor for Controlling Drug Abuse Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Psychiatric Disorders: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Advances
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1