{"title":"Examining Fate: The Debate over Children’s Identity in the Border Areas of Interwar Eastern Upper Silesia","authors":"A. Novikov","doi":"10.14712/23363231.2019.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article deals with two little-known disputes over the national identity of a population in the interwar border area of Eastern Upper Silesia. This area was transferred from Germany to Poland after World War I as a result of a plebiscite. Its local population, the Silesians, did not consider themselves entirely German or Polish, but still underwent a process of Polonization. The plebiscite took place in Upper Silesia in 1921, prompting international controversy and internal debate within the Polish state about how to define the nationality of the Silesians in the context of their internationally protected rights as a “minority.” As this article shows, the Silesians were utilized by Central and Western European politicians as objects of international diplomacy and by the Polish authorities to advance their internal policies. The story of “Maurer’s children” and Silesian children born out of wedlock illustrates the reaction of the Silesian population to the interwar politics of nationalization. These cases attracted international attention from 1926 to 1928 and brought questions of national minorities, bilingual children, and self-definition of nationality vis-a-vis the state’s requirements to the level of international debate. Keywords: World War I; League of Nations; Poland; Upper Silesia; education; nation-building DOI: 10.14712/23363231.2019.16 © 2019 The Authors. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License , which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.","PeriodicalId":33551,"journal":{"name":"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Studia Territorialia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Studia Territorialia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/23363231.2019.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
命运的审视:上西里西亚东部边界地区的儿童身份之争
这篇文章讨论了两次鲜为人知的关于上西里西亚东部两次大战边境地区人口民族身份的争议。第一次世界大战后,由于公民投票,这一地区从德国转移到了波兰。当地居民西里西亚人并不认为自己完全是德国人或波兰人,但仍经历了一个波兰化的过程。公民投票于1921年在上西里西亚举行,引发了国际争议和波兰国内关于如何在西里西亚人作为“少数群体”的国际保护权利背景下定义其国籍的辩论,西里西亚人被中欧和西欧政治家用作国际外交的对象,并被波兰当局用来推进其内部政策。“毛雷尔的孩子”和西里西亚非婚生孩子的故事说明了西里西亚人对两次战争之间国家化政治的反应。从1926年到1928年,这些案件引起了国际社会的关注,并将少数民族、双语儿童以及国籍相对于国家要求的自我定义问题推向了国际辩论的高度。关键词:第一次世界大战;国际联盟;波兰上西里西亚;教育国家建设DOI:10.14712/223363231.2019.16©2019作者。这是一篇根据知识共享署名非商业性非衍生产品许可证条款分发的开放获取文章,该许可证允许在任何媒体上使用、分发和复制,前提是原始作者和来源可信,使用是非商业性的,并且不进行任何修改或改编。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。