Occupational Differences in Barriers and Incentives for Routine Exercise among Municipal Workers

B. Melton, T. K. Kessinger, G. Ryan, A. Riggs
{"title":"Occupational Differences in Barriers and Incentives for Routine Exercise among Municipal Workers","authors":"B. Melton, T. K. Kessinger, G. Ryan, A. Riggs","doi":"10.1249/tjx.0000000000000094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services recommends that employers create healthy worksites through promotion wellness programs that included routine exercise, daily physical activity, and nutritional education among other initiatives.\n \n \n This study aimed to identify barriers and incentives of routine exercise in varying occupations among rural municipal workers in Southeast Georgia.\n \n \n \n A cross-sectional research design was used to evaluate the barriers and incentives for exercise among rural municipal workers in a rural setting. The four occupational departments used for analysis were as follows: fire, police, public works, and administration/other. An electronic survey was sent to all 309 workers on November 2016. The survey asked for participants to rank 10 common exercise barriers and incentives. One-hundred and twenty-three (~40%) complete responses were used for analysis.\n \n \n \n Based on a personal ranking, lack of time to exercise (mean = 2.2), inconvenient time/location of a facility (2.5), and no motivation (5.3) were found to be the top three barriers across all employees. No significant differences (P > 0.05) between departments were found for nine of the exercise barrier rankings. “Cost is too much” was only significantly different result found (P = 0.019) between departments, with fire department reporting lower than the other departments. Another barrier approaching significance was “feel awkward exercising” (P = 0.054).\n \n \n \n The results suggest that a variation of motivators and incentives, depending on occupational responses, could be a successful means of improving exercise in all employees, instead of implementing a single motivating tactic based on the raw majority.\n","PeriodicalId":75243,"journal":{"name":"Translational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/tjx.0000000000000094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services recommends that employers create healthy worksites through promotion wellness programs that included routine exercise, daily physical activity, and nutritional education among other initiatives. This study aimed to identify barriers and incentives of routine exercise in varying occupations among rural municipal workers in Southeast Georgia. A cross-sectional research design was used to evaluate the barriers and incentives for exercise among rural municipal workers in a rural setting. The four occupational departments used for analysis were as follows: fire, police, public works, and administration/other. An electronic survey was sent to all 309 workers on November 2016. The survey asked for participants to rank 10 common exercise barriers and incentives. One-hundred and twenty-three (~40%) complete responses were used for analysis. Based on a personal ranking, lack of time to exercise (mean = 2.2), inconvenient time/location of a facility (2.5), and no motivation (5.3) were found to be the top three barriers across all employees. No significant differences (P > 0.05) between departments were found for nine of the exercise barrier rankings. “Cost is too much” was only significantly different result found (P = 0.019) between departments, with fire department reporting lower than the other departments. Another barrier approaching significance was “feel awkward exercising” (P = 0.054). The results suggest that a variation of motivators and incentives, depending on occupational responses, could be a successful means of improving exercise in all employees, instead of implementing a single motivating tactic based on the raw majority.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
市政工人日常锻炼的障碍和激励因素的职业差异
美国卫生与公众服务部建议雇主通过促进健康计划创建健康的工作场所,包括日常锻炼、日常体育活动和营养教育等举措。本研究旨在确定佐治亚州东南部农村市政工人在不同职业中进行日常锻炼的障碍和激励因素。采用横断面研究设计来评估农村环境中农村市政工人锻炼的障碍和激励措施。用于分析的四个职业部门如下:消防、警察、公共工程和行政/其他部门。2016年11月,向所有309名工人发送了一份电子调查。该调查要求参与者对10种常见的锻炼障碍和激励因素进行排名。123个(约40%)完整的回答被用于分析。根据个人排名,缺乏锻炼时间(平均值=2.2)、不方便的时间/地点(2.5)和没有动力(5.3)被发现是所有员工的前三大障碍。在9个运动障碍排名中,各部门之间没有发现显著差异(P>0.05)。“成本太高”的结果在不同部门之间只有显著差异(P=0.019),消防部门的报告低于其他部门。另一个接近显著性的障碍是“感到尴尬的锻炼”(P=0.054)。研究结果表明,根据职业反应,激励因素和激励措施的变化可能是改善所有员工锻炼的成功手段,而不是基于原始多数实施单一的激励策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lifestyle strategies after intentional weight loss: results from the MAINTAIN-pc randomized trial. Associations of physical and social workplace characteristics with movement behaviors at work. Demographic, Clinical, and Psychosocial Predictors of Exercise Adherence: The STRRIDE Trials. Framework to Classify Physical Activity Intervention Studies for Older Adults Translational Journal of the American College of Sports Medicine: 2022 Paper of the Year
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1