Negotiating RCEP: The Role of ASEAN in Middle-Power Diplomacy

IF 0.4 Q3 LAW China and WTO Review Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.14330/cwr.2023.9.1.05
F. Magno, M. J. E. Vivo
{"title":"Negotiating RCEP: The Role of ASEAN in Middle-Power Diplomacy","authors":"F. Magno, M. J. E. Vivo","doi":"10.14330/cwr.2023.9.1.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) engaged with each other and their five major neighbors in the Asia-Pacific region, namely China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, and New Zealand, to develop the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), a comprehensive free trade agreement streamlining all previous agreements among the participating countries. This article applied the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) method in assessing the RCEP and the key role played by the ASEAN in the negotiation process through middle-power diplomacy. The RCEP's strengths in economic integration and weaknesses in certain policy areas encapsulate ASEAN centrality and its strategy of hedging on China, the sole great power in the agreement. The opportunities and threats to the RCEP posed by the increasing geopolitical tensions between China and the US amid the COVID-19 pandemic, meanwhile, demonstrate the complex regional and global geopolitical situation that ASEAN should navigate to ensure the success of the RCEP and maintain centrality in the process. © 2023, Yijun Institute of International Law. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":40992,"journal":{"name":"China and WTO Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China and WTO Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14330/cwr.2023.9.1.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) engaged with each other and their five major neighbors in the Asia-Pacific region, namely China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, and New Zealand, to develop the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), a comprehensive free trade agreement streamlining all previous agreements among the participating countries. This article applied the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) method in assessing the RCEP and the key role played by the ASEAN in the negotiation process through middle-power diplomacy. The RCEP's strengths in economic integration and weaknesses in certain policy areas encapsulate ASEAN centrality and its strategy of hedging on China, the sole great power in the agreement. The opportunities and threats to the RCEP posed by the increasing geopolitical tensions between China and the US amid the COVID-19 pandemic, meanwhile, demonstrate the complex regional and global geopolitical situation that ASEAN should navigate to ensure the success of the RCEP and maintain centrality in the process. © 2023, Yijun Institute of International Law. All rights reserved.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
RCEP谈判:东盟在中等大国外交中的作用
东南亚国家联盟(ASEAN)成员国与中国、日本、韩国、澳大利亚和新西兰等亚太地区五大邻国一道,共同制定了《区域全面经济伙伴关系协定》(RCEP),这是一项全面的自由贸易协定,对东盟成员国之前达成的所有协定进行了精简。本文运用优势、劣势、机会和威胁(SWOT)方法来评估RCEP以及东盟通过中等大国外交在谈判过程中发挥的关键作用。RCEP在经济一体化方面的优势和在某些政策领域的弱点,体现了东盟的中心地位及其对协议中唯一大国中国的对冲策略。在新冠肺炎疫情背景下,中美地缘政治紧张加剧给RCEP带来机遇和威胁,同时也表明,东盟要把握好复杂的地区和全球地缘政治形势,确保RCEP取得成功并保持中心地位。©2023,义军国际法研究所。版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
US-China Trade Relations: Tectonic Changes and Political Risk in the Global System – National Security, Industrial Policy, and Protectionism Trade Relations among the BRICS Countries: An Indian Perspective RCEP and Indo-Pacific Region: Implications for India’s Act East Policy Academic Research and Development of China Studies at SOAS in London The Legal Framework of Patent Valuation: A Comparative View between the US, the PRC and Vietnam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1