Current Issues on Regulation: A View from France

IF 0.5 Q3 LAW European Public Law Pub Date : 2022-02-01 DOI:10.54648/euro2022004
Thomas D. Perroud, B. Deffains
{"title":"Current Issues on Regulation: A View from France","authors":"Thomas D. Perroud, B. Deffains","doi":"10.54648/euro2022004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of the article is first to show there are worrying signs that the consensus about independent regulation is cracking in several countries that matter. We then go on to demonstrate that there are blind spots in the European framework of public service regulation. Regulation in the EU focuses too much on competition and not enough on other objectives. Finally we attempt to rethink the regulatory framework of public services in Europe in a way that would take all the competing interests of society into account. Although the main focus of the article falls on French and European experiences, it also adopts a broader view.\nregulation, public services, competition law, monetary policy, cost-benefit analysis, indirect administration, accountability","PeriodicalId":43955,"journal":{"name":"European Public Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Public Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/euro2022004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of the article is first to show there are worrying signs that the consensus about independent regulation is cracking in several countries that matter. We then go on to demonstrate that there are blind spots in the European framework of public service regulation. Regulation in the EU focuses too much on competition and not enough on other objectives. Finally we attempt to rethink the regulatory framework of public services in Europe in a way that would take all the competing interests of society into account. Although the main focus of the article falls on French and European experiences, it also adopts a broader view. regulation, public services, competition law, monetary policy, cost-benefit analysis, indirect administration, accountability
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当前监管问题:来自法国的观点
这篇文章的目的首先是展示一些令人担忧的迹象,即在一些重要的国家,关于独立监管的共识正在破裂。然后,我们继续证明欧洲公共服务监管框架中存在盲点。欧盟的监管过于关注竞争,而对其他目标关注不够。最后,我们试图重新思考欧洲公共服务的监管框架,以一种将社会所有相互竞争的利益都考虑在内的方式。虽然这篇文章的主要焦点落在法国和欧洲的经验上,但它也采取了更广泛的观点。监管、公共服务、竞争法、货币政策、成本效益分析、间接管理、问责制
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
‘Respect for Religious Feelings’: As the Italian Case Shows, Fresh Paint Can’t Fix the Crumbling Wall of Blasphemy The ‘Then’ and the ‘Now’ of Forced Relocation of Indigenous Peoples: Repercussions in International Law, Torts and Beyond Subsidiarity v. Autonomy in the EU Book Review: Federalism and Constitutional Law: The Italian Contribution to Comparative Regionalism, Erika Arban, Giuseppe Martinico & Francesco Palermo (eds). London and New York: Routledge. 2021 The Tragic Choices During the Global Health Emergency: Comparative Economic Law Reflections
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1