The evolving landscape of BRAF inhibitors in BRAF mutant colorectal cancer and the added value of cytotoxic chemotherapy

Barbara Geerinckx, Annabel Smith, T. Price
{"title":"The evolving landscape of BRAF inhibitors in BRAF mutant colorectal cancer and the added value of cytotoxic chemotherapy","authors":"Barbara Geerinckx, Annabel Smith, T. Price","doi":"10.21037/dmr-21-99","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our understanding of the molecular profile and associated targeted therapies has revolutionised the approach to treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Approximately 10% (range, 8–21%) of mCRC carry a BRAF mutation which occurs primarily (>90%) at the V600E codon and leads to overactivation of the RAS/RAF/MEK/ ERK signalling [mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK)] pathway (1). BRAF mutant (MT) mCRC are renowned for their poor prognosis with a median overall survival (OS) inferior ranging from 10 to 20 months with resistance to standard systemic therapy, often not even reaching secondline treatment (2,3). The exception is the subset of MSI-H/ dMRR patients (up to 30% of BRAF MT CRC) who benefit from immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) following the recent Keynote-177 trial (4). Unlike melanoma, previous trials with BRAF inhibition monotherapy (or combination with MEK inhibition) for BRAF MT mCRC show only minimal activity. This is due to feedback upregulation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) that re-activates the oncogenic pathway bypassing BRAF. Benefit of combining BRAF and EGFR inhibitors to overcome this pharmacological escape has been seen in several trials now. The BEACON phase 3 trial (5) is the pivotal study of this approach showing that the combination of the BRAF inhibitor encorafenib with anti-EGFR treatment (cetuximab) with or without a MEKinhibitor (binimetinib) led to significantly better OS and overall response rates (ORR) compared to irinotecan (FOLFIRI) or irinotecan with cetuximab. One strategy to ameliorate outcomes of these patients might be to combine multiple mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) targeting agents with cytotoxic agents. Encouraging preclinical data combining irinotecan with anti-BRAF molecules (6,7), led Kopetz et al. (8) to explore the addition of the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib to a backbone of irinotecan and cetuximab in previously treated BRAF MT mCRC.","PeriodicalId":72814,"journal":{"name":"Digestive medicine research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive medicine research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/dmr-21-99","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our understanding of the molecular profile and associated targeted therapies has revolutionised the approach to treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Approximately 10% (range, 8–21%) of mCRC carry a BRAF mutation which occurs primarily (>90%) at the V600E codon and leads to overactivation of the RAS/RAF/MEK/ ERK signalling [mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK)] pathway (1). BRAF mutant (MT) mCRC are renowned for their poor prognosis with a median overall survival (OS) inferior ranging from 10 to 20 months with resistance to standard systemic therapy, often not even reaching secondline treatment (2,3). The exception is the subset of MSI-H/ dMRR patients (up to 30% of BRAF MT CRC) who benefit from immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) following the recent Keynote-177 trial (4). Unlike melanoma, previous trials with BRAF inhibition monotherapy (or combination with MEK inhibition) for BRAF MT mCRC show only minimal activity. This is due to feedback upregulation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) that re-activates the oncogenic pathway bypassing BRAF. Benefit of combining BRAF and EGFR inhibitors to overcome this pharmacological escape has been seen in several trials now. The BEACON phase 3 trial (5) is the pivotal study of this approach showing that the combination of the BRAF inhibitor encorafenib with anti-EGFR treatment (cetuximab) with or without a MEKinhibitor (binimetinib) led to significantly better OS and overall response rates (ORR) compared to irinotecan (FOLFIRI) or irinotecan with cetuximab. One strategy to ameliorate outcomes of these patients might be to combine multiple mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) targeting agents with cytotoxic agents. Encouraging preclinical data combining irinotecan with anti-BRAF molecules (6,7), led Kopetz et al. (8) to explore the addition of the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib to a backbone of irinotecan and cetuximab in previously treated BRAF MT mCRC.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
BRAF抑制剂在BRAF突变型结直肠癌中的发展前景和细胞毒性化疗的附加价值
我们对分子谱和相关靶向治疗的理解已经彻底改变了转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)的治疗方法。大约10%(范围8-21%)的mCRC携带BRAF突变,该突变主要发生在V600E密码子上,导致RAS/RAF/MEK/ ERK信号通路过度激活(1)。BRAF突变(MT) mCRC以预后差而闻名,中位总生存期(OS)低于10至20个月,对标准全身治疗有耐药性,通常甚至达不到二线治疗(2,3)。唯一的例外是MSI-H/ dMRR患者(高达30%的BRAF MT CRC),他们在最近的Keynote-177试验中受益于检查点抑制剂(CPI)的免疫治疗(4)。与黑色素瘤不同,BRAF抑制单药治疗(或联合MEK抑制)BRAF MT mCRC的先前试验显示只有极小的活性。这是由于表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)的反馈上调,它重新激活了绕过BRAF的致癌途径。联合BRAF和EGFR抑制剂克服这种药物逃逸的好处已经在几个试验中看到。BEACON 3期试验(5)是该方法的关键研究,表明BRAF抑制剂encorafenib与抗egfr治疗(西妥昔单抗)联合或不联合mekin抑制剂(binimetinib)与伊立替康(FOLFIRI)或伊立替康与西妥昔单抗相比,可显著提高OS和总缓解率(ORR)。改善这些患者预后的一种策略可能是将多种丝裂原活化蛋白激酶(MAPK)靶向药物与细胞毒性药物联合使用。鼓舞人心的临床前数据将伊立替康与抗BRAF分子联合使用(6,7),Kopetz等人(8)探索将BRAF抑制剂vemurafenib添加到伊立替康和西妥昔单抗的主干中,用于先前治疗的BRAF MT mCRC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Histone acylations as a mechanism for regulation of intestinal epithelial cells. Focus on technical advancement in mini-invasive hepatobiliary Liver gates to access everywhere in the liver: how can we learn? Advances in the management of peritoneal carcinomatosis Ablative radiation therapy advances in pancreatic cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1