Moira Downey, Sophia Lafferty-Hess, P. Charbonneau, Angela Zoss
{"title":"Engaging Researchers in Data Dialogues: Designing Collaborative Programming to Promote Research Data Sharing","authors":"Moira Downey, Sophia Lafferty-Hess, P. Charbonneau, Angela Zoss","doi":"10.7191/JESLIB.2021.1193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A range of regulatory pressures emanating from funding agencies and scholarly journals increasingly encourage researchers to engage in formal data sharing practices. As academic libraries continue to refine their role in supporting researchers in this data sharing space, one particular challenge has been finding new ways to meaningfully engage with campus researchers. Libraries help shape norms and encourage data sharing through education and training, and there has been significant growth in the services these institutions are able to provide and the ways in which library staff are able to collaborate and communicate with researchers. Evidence also suggests that within disciplines, normative pressures and expectations around professional conduct have a significant impact on data sharing behaviors (Kim and Adler 2015; Sigit Sayogo and Pardo 2013; Zenk-Moltgen et al. 2018). Duke University Libraries' Research Data Management program has recently centered part of its outreach strategy on leveraging peer networks and social modeling to encourage and normalize robust data sharing practices among campus researchers. The program has hosted two panel discussions on issues related to data management—specifically, data sharing and research reproducibility. This paper reflects on some lessons learned from these outreach efforts and outlines next steps.","PeriodicalId":90214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of escience librarianship","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of escience librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7191/JESLIB.2021.1193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A range of regulatory pressures emanating from funding agencies and scholarly journals increasingly encourage researchers to engage in formal data sharing practices. As academic libraries continue to refine their role in supporting researchers in this data sharing space, one particular challenge has been finding new ways to meaningfully engage with campus researchers. Libraries help shape norms and encourage data sharing through education and training, and there has been significant growth in the services these institutions are able to provide and the ways in which library staff are able to collaborate and communicate with researchers. Evidence also suggests that within disciplines, normative pressures and expectations around professional conduct have a significant impact on data sharing behaviors (Kim and Adler 2015; Sigit Sayogo and Pardo 2013; Zenk-Moltgen et al. 2018). Duke University Libraries' Research Data Management program has recently centered part of its outreach strategy on leveraging peer networks and social modeling to encourage and normalize robust data sharing practices among campus researchers. The program has hosted two panel discussions on issues related to data management—specifically, data sharing and research reproducibility. This paper reflects on some lessons learned from these outreach efforts and outlines next steps.
来自资助机构和学术期刊的一系列监管压力越来越多地鼓励研究人员参与正式的数据共享实践。随着学术图书馆在支持数据共享领域的研究人员方面不断完善自己的角色,一个特别的挑战是找到与校园研究人员进行有意义接触的新方法。图书馆通过教育和培训帮助形成规范并鼓励数据共享,这些机构能够提供的服务以及图书馆工作人员能够与研究人员合作和沟通的方式都有了显著的增长。证据还表明,在学科内部,规范压力和对专业行为的期望对数据共享行为有重大影响(Kim and Adler 2015;Sigit Sayogo and Pardo 2013;Zenk-Moltgen et al. 2018)。杜克大学图书馆的研究数据管理项目最近将其拓展战略的一部分集中在利用对等网络和社会模型上,以鼓励和规范校园研究人员之间的强大数据共享实践。该项目举办了两场关于数据管理相关问题的小组讨论,特别是数据共享和研究可重复性。本文反思了从这些外联工作中吸取的一些经验教训,并概述了今后的步骤。