The Expressive Power of the N-Operator and the Decidability of Logic in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus

Pub Date : 2022-04-13 DOI:10.1080/01445340.2022.2056687
Rodrigo Ferreira
{"title":"The Expressive Power of the N-Operator and the Decidability of Logic in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus","authors":"Rodrigo Ferreira","doi":"10.1080/01445340.2022.2056687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present text discusses whether there is a tension between aphorisms 6.1-6.13 of the Tractatus and the Church-Turing theorem about the decidability of predicate logic. We attempt to establish the following points: (i) Aphorisms 6.1-6.13 are not consistent with the Church-Turing theorem. (ii) The logical symbolism of the Tractatus, built from the N-operator, can (and should) be interpreted as expressively complete with respect to first-order formulas. (iii) Wittgenstein’s reasons for believing that Logic is decidable were purely philosophical and the undecidability result shows that there are aspects of his criticisms of Frege and Russell that become unjustified in light of these results.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01445340.2022.2056687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present text discusses whether there is a tension between aphorisms 6.1-6.13 of the Tractatus and the Church-Turing theorem about the decidability of predicate logic. We attempt to establish the following points: (i) Aphorisms 6.1-6.13 are not consistent with the Church-Turing theorem. (ii) The logical symbolism of the Tractatus, built from the N-operator, can (and should) be interpreted as expressively complete with respect to first-order formulas. (iii) Wittgenstein’s reasons for believing that Logic is decidable were purely philosophical and the undecidability result shows that there are aspects of his criticisms of Frege and Russell that become unjustified in light of these results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
维特根斯坦《论》中N算子的表现力与逻辑的可判定性
本文讨论了论论的警句6.1-6.13与丘奇-图灵定理关于谓词逻辑的可决性是否存在矛盾。我们试图建立以下几点:(i)警句6.1-6.13与丘奇-图灵定理不一致。(ii)由n算子构建的Tractatus的逻辑符号可以(也应该)被解释为相对于一阶公式的表达完备。(iii)维特根斯坦相信逻辑是可决定的理由是纯粹哲学的,而不可决定的结果表明,他对弗雷格和罗素的批评有一些方面在这些结果的基础上变得不合理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1