Differences in Risk Preferences of the Main Ethnic Groups in Peninsular Malaysia: A Field Experiment

IF 0.5 Q4 ECONOMICS Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies Pub Date : 2019-06-10 DOI:10.22452/MJES.VOL56NO1.8
Kean Siang Chng, S. Narayanan
{"title":"Differences in Risk Preferences of the Main Ethnic Groups in Peninsular Malaysia: A Field Experiment","authors":"Kean Siang Chng, S. Narayanan","doi":"10.22452/MJES.VOL56NO1.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is widely held that risk preferences differ between the three ethnic groups in Malaysia with the Chinese having the highest preference for risk and Malays having the lowest. This has been used to explain the Chinese preference for, and success in, business ventures relative to Malays. However, this assumption has never been tested in a controlled environment. Three hundred working adults from the three groups were recruited and participated in two-choice lottery games with real monetary reward and risk. The results were analysed using the framework of cumulative prospect theory. The outcomes indicate that broad generalisations regarding inter-ethnic risk tolerance are inaccurate. Malays were less risk averse than the Chinese or others when facing choices with the possibility of losing but became more risk averse only when facing choices with the possibility of winning. Malays were also more willing to take greater risk to reduce possible loss than to settle for a sure gain, compared to the others.","PeriodicalId":42743,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22452/MJES.VOL56NO1.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

It is widely held that risk preferences differ between the three ethnic groups in Malaysia with the Chinese having the highest preference for risk and Malays having the lowest. This has been used to explain the Chinese preference for, and success in, business ventures relative to Malays. However, this assumption has never been tested in a controlled environment. Three hundred working adults from the three groups were recruited and participated in two-choice lottery games with real monetary reward and risk. The results were analysed using the framework of cumulative prospect theory. The outcomes indicate that broad generalisations regarding inter-ethnic risk tolerance are inaccurate. Malays were less risk averse than the Chinese or others when facing choices with the possibility of losing but became more risk averse only when facing choices with the possibility of winning. Malays were also more willing to take greater risk to reduce possible loss than to settle for a sure gain, compared to the others.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马来西亚半岛主要民族风险偏好差异的田野实验
人们普遍认为,马来西亚三个民族的风险偏好不同,华人对风险偏好最高,马来人对风险偏好最低。这被用来解释相对于马来人,中国人对商业冒险的偏好和成功。然而,这一假设从未在受控环境中进行过测试。来自这三组的300名在职成年人被招募并参加了两种选择的彩票游戏,其中有真正的金钱奖励和风险。利用累积远景理论对结果进行了分析。结果表明,关于种族间风险承受能力的广泛概括是不准确的。马来人在面临可能失败的选择时比中国人或其他人更不厌恶风险,但只有在面临可能获胜的选择时,他们才会变得更厌恶风险。与其他人相比,马来人也更愿意冒更大的风险来减少可能的损失,而不是为了获得一定的收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
25.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: The primary purpose of the journal is to promote publications of original research related to the Malaysian economy. It is also designed to serve as an outlet for studies on the South-east Asian countries and the Asian region. The journal also considers high-quality works related to other regions that provide relevant policy lessons to Malaysia. The journal is receptive to papers in all areas of economics. We encourage specifically contributions on all range of economic topics of an applied or policy nature. At the same time, submissions of methodological or theoretical studies with results that are of practical use are welcome. Works that are interdisciplinary will be considered provided that they contain substantial economic contents.
期刊最新文献
Minimum Wage and Employment of Malaysian Low-skilled Workers Does Local Risk Still Matter in the Highly Liberalised Emerging Market of Malaysia? Effects of Government Expenditure on the Poverty Level: A Nonlinear ARDL Approach Including Public Realism in Determining New Pricing Scheme for Sanitary Landfill in Malaysia Does the Founder CEO Receive a Higher Pay for the Firm’s Performance? Evidence from Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1