Emergency Medicine Physicians’ Approaches to Coping with Stress in COVID-19 Pandemic

IF 0.3 Q4 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.4274/eajem.galenos.2020.86094
M. Demir, A. Ataman
{"title":"Emergency Medicine Physicians’ Approaches to Coping with Stress in COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"M. Demir, A. Ataman","doi":"10.4274/eajem.galenos.2020.86094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study aimed to investigate the stress experienced by emergency medicine physicians working in emergency departments during the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the factors they stated to be effective against stress, and their coping approaches to stressful situations. Materials and Methods: The study was designed in a general screening model, and 200 emergency medicine physicians participated via e-mail who work in emergency departments in Turkey. The sources of stress related to the pandemic, the factors that they find effective in combating stress, and their strategies to cope with stress were investigated with relation to their gender, marital status, after-shift accommodation, manner of working in a shift, smoking behavior, having a chronic disease, having children, and spouse's job as a healthcare professional. Results: While the primary source of stress of emergency medicine physicians during the pandemic was the risk of transmitting the virus to their families, the most influential factor in combating stress was leisure activities. Emergency physicians' approaches to coping with stress were significantly predicted by the variables of using full personal protective equipment while working, having an adequate sleep and resting opportunities, obtaining additional economic income, and not knowing the pandemic's end date. Conclusion: Emergency medicine physicians used active problem-oriented approaches, and among these, they used the social support seeking approach the most during the pandemic. It is necessary to provide social support, take precautions to care for healthcare workers' families and arrange emergency physicians' shifts to allocate their time to their leisure activities appropriately to reduce stress.","PeriodicalId":11814,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/eajem.galenos.2020.86094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to investigate the stress experienced by emergency medicine physicians working in emergency departments during the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the factors they stated to be effective against stress, and their coping approaches to stressful situations. Materials and Methods: The study was designed in a general screening model, and 200 emergency medicine physicians participated via e-mail who work in emergency departments in Turkey. The sources of stress related to the pandemic, the factors that they find effective in combating stress, and their strategies to cope with stress were investigated with relation to their gender, marital status, after-shift accommodation, manner of working in a shift, smoking behavior, having a chronic disease, having children, and spouse's job as a healthcare professional. Results: While the primary source of stress of emergency medicine physicians during the pandemic was the risk of transmitting the virus to their families, the most influential factor in combating stress was leisure activities. Emergency physicians' approaches to coping with stress were significantly predicted by the variables of using full personal protective equipment while working, having an adequate sleep and resting opportunities, obtaining additional economic income, and not knowing the pandemic's end date. Conclusion: Emergency medicine physicians used active problem-oriented approaches, and among these, they used the social support seeking approach the most during the pandemic. It is necessary to provide social support, take precautions to care for healthcare workers' families and arrange emergency physicians' shifts to allocate their time to their leisure activities appropriately to reduce stress.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19大流行中急诊医师应对压力的方法
目的:本研究旨在调查2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)大流行期间在急诊科工作的急诊医生所经历的压力,他们所说的有效对抗压力的因素,以及他们应对压力的方法。材料和方法:这项研究是在普通筛查模式下设计的,200名在土耳其急诊科工作的急诊医生通过电子邮件参与了研究。调查了与疫情相关的压力来源、他们发现有效对抗压力的因素以及他们应对压力的策略,这些因素与他们的性别、婚姻状况、下班后的住宿、轮班工作方式、吸烟行为、患有慢性病、生儿育女以及配偶作为医疗专业人员的工作有关。结果:虽然在疫情期间,急诊医生的主要压力来源是将病毒传播给家人的风险,但对抗压力最具影响力的因素是休闲活动。急诊医生应对压力的方法受到工作时使用全套个人防护装备、有足够的睡眠和休息机会、获得额外经济收入以及不知道疫情结束日期等变量的显著预测。结论:急诊医生使用了积极的问题导向方法,其中,他们在疫情期间使用最多的是寻求社会支持的方法。有必要提供社会支持,采取预防措施照顾医护人员的家人,并安排急诊医生轮班,适当分配他们的时间进行休闲活动,以减轻压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Examining the Link between the SATIS-Stroke Questionnaire and the Modified Rankin Scale in Stroke Patients at 30 Days Post-discharge Attack on Health Care Workers: A New Complex Cancerous Humanitarian Emergency: High Time to Report and Resect Comparison of MGAP, GAP, and RTS for Predicting Early Mortality in Multiple Trauma Patients Bilateral Lingual Artery Embolization to Control Massive Oral Bleeding That Leads to Cardiac Arrest Epiglottitis with a Complication of Epiglottic Abscess: A Case Report and Review of the Literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1