Fazrul Hanim Abd Sata, Nurul Azlin Azmi, Muhamad Ashaari Sukar, Mohd Taufik Mohd Suffian, Reni Yendrawati Reni Yendrawati, N. B. Zakaria
{"title":"Does Political Connection and Family Business Create or Destroy Firm Performance: Lessons Learned from Malaysia","authors":"Fazrul Hanim Abd Sata, Nurul Azlin Azmi, Muhamad Ashaari Sukar, Mohd Taufik Mohd Suffian, Reni Yendrawati Reni Yendrawati, N. B. Zakaria","doi":"10.24191/apmaj.v18i1-06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the effect of the family business on firm performance and whether the political connection moderates these relationships. Final sample consisted of 1,969 firm-year observations from 2013 - 2017. Family characteristics and political connections data were hand-collected from annual report and financial data were extracted from Eikon Datastream. We found that family chairmanship and high family ownership concentration can destroy firm performance, exhibited by low Tobin Q. However, the moderating effect of political connection between family business and firm performance showed a positive and significant association. This implies that politicians in the family firm can create firm performance as they can work as external watchdogs. Additional analysis showed that political connections in high family ownership can destroy firm performance. These findings provide practical implications for regulators and investors that they should be mindful of the designation of family members and appointment of politicians in firms as it may create agency costs and destroy firm performance. This study adds to the limited, albeit important evidence on the joint effect of politically connected firms and family businesses on firm performance. Keywords: family business, political connection, firm performance","PeriodicalId":41923,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24191/apmaj.v18i1-06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study examined the effect of the family business on firm performance and whether the political connection moderates these relationships. Final sample consisted of 1,969 firm-year observations from 2013 - 2017. Family characteristics and political connections data were hand-collected from annual report and financial data were extracted from Eikon Datastream. We found that family chairmanship and high family ownership concentration can destroy firm performance, exhibited by low Tobin Q. However, the moderating effect of political connection between family business and firm performance showed a positive and significant association. This implies that politicians in the family firm can create firm performance as they can work as external watchdogs. Additional analysis showed that political connections in high family ownership can destroy firm performance. These findings provide practical implications for regulators and investors that they should be mindful of the designation of family members and appointment of politicians in firms as it may create agency costs and destroy firm performance. This study adds to the limited, albeit important evidence on the joint effect of politically connected firms and family businesses on firm performance. Keywords: family business, political connection, firm performance