Book review: China's Fintech Explosion: Disruption, Innovation, and Survival by Sara Hsu and Jianjun Li

IF 2.3 3区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES China Information Pub Date : 2021-11-01 DOI:10.1177/0920203X211051055a
Steve Harrisson
{"title":"Book review: China's Fintech Explosion: Disruption, Innovation, and Survival by Sara Hsu and Jianjun Li","authors":"Steve Harrisson","doi":"10.1177/0920203X211051055a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"settlement . . . was the Nationalist regime of Chiang Kai-shek, not the Communist government of Mao Zedong’ (p. 13). Chapters 2 through 5 explore the uneven, often contentious, at times comical elevation of the profiles of Chiang Kai-shek and his party for their World War II and post-war roles. Mitter traces the evolution of historical narrative through the lenses of an expanded latitude for historians, a less constrained public sphere, public memorialization, and the evolving symbolism of Chongqing and Yan’an (the respective wartime bases of Chiang’s Nationalists and Mao’s Communists). Among the interesting episodes discussed are the phenomenon of ‘Kuomintang/Republican fans’ (國粉) and the Nationalists’ 1938 victory against the Japanese in the Battle of Taierzhuang. Praise of the Kuomintang for success in the latter was eased by the fact that one of the generals, Li Zongren, defected to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) after the Communists’ victory in the Chinese civil war. The final chapter follows the new, guardedly pro-Nationalist narrative onto the global stage. Here, the party narrative has highlighted the immediate aftermath of World War II, especially the November 1943 Cairo Conference. That meeting between Allied leaders Franklin Roosevelt, Winston Churchill, and Chiang Kai-shek receives far less attention amongWestern historians than do the earlier Atlantic Charter or the subsequent Allied meetings at Tehran and Yalta – none of which involved Chiang. Mitter sees some justice in Chinese pique at such neglect. ‘Few in the West have explored China’s wartime goals as seen through Chinese eyes’ (p. 28). In post-1980s Chinese narratives, China’s contributions both to the war effort and to the creation of a new post-WorldWar II global order constitute a key rationale for the PRC’s role in helping to shape the still emerging order of the post-Cold War world. AswithChinese public and cultural diplomacymore generally, these efforts have included awkward moments. An early poster for the 2015 movie, Cairo Declaration (dir. Wen Deguang and Hu Minggang), for example, featured Mao Zedong and Joseph Stalin (neither of whom attended the conference), along with Roosevelt and Churchill. The film’s semi-fictionalized Roosevelt anticipates Xi Jinping’s China, declaring that ‘China’s war has changed the world. China is a responsible world power.’ Some readers may find helpful the author’s subtle application to his material of theories about vectors and circuits of memory. ‘Soft power’ will be familiar to more readers. Mitter offers occasional observations on contemporary politics beyond (though geopolitically related to) China, such as populism and internationalism. Finally, he includes numerous suggestive analogies – to civil wars in Spain and Greece, to the collaborationist Vichy government in France, to successive wars in Vietnam, to more stable memories of World War II in most Western nations – which might be fruitfully pursued in future scholarship.","PeriodicalId":45809,"journal":{"name":"China Information","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Information","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0920203X211051055a","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

settlement . . . was the Nationalist regime of Chiang Kai-shek, not the Communist government of Mao Zedong’ (p. 13). Chapters 2 through 5 explore the uneven, often contentious, at times comical elevation of the profiles of Chiang Kai-shek and his party for their World War II and post-war roles. Mitter traces the evolution of historical narrative through the lenses of an expanded latitude for historians, a less constrained public sphere, public memorialization, and the evolving symbolism of Chongqing and Yan’an (the respective wartime bases of Chiang’s Nationalists and Mao’s Communists). Among the interesting episodes discussed are the phenomenon of ‘Kuomintang/Republican fans’ (國粉) and the Nationalists’ 1938 victory against the Japanese in the Battle of Taierzhuang. Praise of the Kuomintang for success in the latter was eased by the fact that one of the generals, Li Zongren, defected to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) after the Communists’ victory in the Chinese civil war. The final chapter follows the new, guardedly pro-Nationalist narrative onto the global stage. Here, the party narrative has highlighted the immediate aftermath of World War II, especially the November 1943 Cairo Conference. That meeting between Allied leaders Franklin Roosevelt, Winston Churchill, and Chiang Kai-shek receives far less attention amongWestern historians than do the earlier Atlantic Charter or the subsequent Allied meetings at Tehran and Yalta – none of which involved Chiang. Mitter sees some justice in Chinese pique at such neglect. ‘Few in the West have explored China’s wartime goals as seen through Chinese eyes’ (p. 28). In post-1980s Chinese narratives, China’s contributions both to the war effort and to the creation of a new post-WorldWar II global order constitute a key rationale for the PRC’s role in helping to shape the still emerging order of the post-Cold War world. AswithChinese public and cultural diplomacymore generally, these efforts have included awkward moments. An early poster for the 2015 movie, Cairo Declaration (dir. Wen Deguang and Hu Minggang), for example, featured Mao Zedong and Joseph Stalin (neither of whom attended the conference), along with Roosevelt and Churchill. The film’s semi-fictionalized Roosevelt anticipates Xi Jinping’s China, declaring that ‘China’s war has changed the world. China is a responsible world power.’ Some readers may find helpful the author’s subtle application to his material of theories about vectors and circuits of memory. ‘Soft power’ will be familiar to more readers. Mitter offers occasional observations on contemporary politics beyond (though geopolitically related to) China, such as populism and internationalism. Finally, he includes numerous suggestive analogies – to civil wars in Spain and Greece, to the collaborationist Vichy government in France, to successive wars in Vietnam, to more stable memories of World War II in most Western nations – which might be fruitfully pursued in future scholarship.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
书评:《中国的金融科技爆炸:颠覆、创新与生存》,作者:Sara Hsu和李建军
协议是蒋介石的国民党政权,而不是毛泽东的共产党政府(第13页)。第二章至第五章探讨了蒋介石及其政党在第二次世界大战和战后角色的不均衡、经常有争议、有时滑稽的提升。米特通过扩大历史学家的自由度、减少限制的公共领域、公共纪念以及重庆和延安(蒋介石的国民党和毛的共产党各自的战时基地)不断演变的象征来追溯历史叙事的演变。讨论的有趣事件包括“国民党/共和党粉丝”现象(國粉) 1938年国民党在台儿庄战役中战胜日本人。其中一位将军李宗仁在中国内战胜利后叛逃到中华人民共和国,这一事实缓和了人们对国民党在后者中取得成功的赞扬。最后一章跟随新的、谨慎的亲民族主义叙事登上全球舞台。在这里,政党的叙述突出了第二次世界大战的直接后果,特别是1943年11月的开罗会议。与早期的《大西洋宪章》或随后在德黑兰和雅尔塔举行的盟军会议相比,盟军领导人富兰克林·罗斯福、温斯顿·丘吉尔和蒋介石之间的那次会议在西方历史学家中受到的关注要少得多。米特从中国人对这种忽视的愤怒中看到了一些正义西方很少有人通过中国人的眼光来探讨中国的战时目标(第28页)。在20世纪80年代后的中国叙事中,中国对战争努力和建立二战后新的全球秩序的贡献,构成了中国在帮助塑造冷战后世界仍在崛起的秩序方面发挥作用的关键理由。正如中国公众和文化外交界普遍认为的那样,这些努力包括尴尬的时刻。例如,2015年电影《开罗宣言》(导演温德光和胡明刚)的早期海报上有毛泽东和约瑟夫·斯大林(两人都没有出席会议),还有罗斯福和丘吉尔。 中国是一个负责任的世界大国一些读者可能会发现,作者将其巧妙地应用于有关记忆矢量和回路的理论材料中是有帮助的“软实力”将为更多读者所熟悉。米特偶尔会对中国以外的当代政治(尽管与地缘政治有关)进行观察,比如民粹主义和国际主义。最后,他列举了许多具有启发性的类比——西班牙和希腊的内战,法国的合作主义维希政府,越南的连续战争,大多数西方国家对第二次世界大战的更稳定记忆——这些都可能在未来的学术研究中得到丰硕的成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
China Information
China Information AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: China Information presents timely and in-depth analyses of major developments in contemporary China and overseas Chinese communities in the areas of politics, economics, law, ecology, culture, and society, including literature and the arts. China Information pays special attention to views and areas that do not receive sufficient attention in the mainstream discourse on contemporary China. It encourages discussion and debate between different academic traditions, offers a platform to express controversial and dissenting opinions, and promotes research that is historically sensitive and contemporarily relevant.
期刊最新文献
Book Review: From Missionary Education to Confucius Institutes: Historical Reflections on Sino-American Cultural Exchange by Jeff Kyong-McClain and Joseph Tse-Hei Lee (eds) Regulatory capture of the Chinese social credit system: Bureaucratic self-interests in project implementation Chinese standards from the ground up Practice diffusion in China’s two-pronged engagement in global technical standardization Regulating local government debt in China: Intended and unintended consequences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1