On The Chinese Socialist Market Economy And The “New Projectment Economy”

Elias Jabbour, Alexis Dantas, Carlos José Espíndola
{"title":"On The Chinese Socialist Market Economy And The “New Projectment Economy”","authors":"Elias Jabbour, Alexis Dantas, Carlos José Espíndola","doi":"10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.13.4.0502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to show that the Chinese development process over the past four decades is not a self-explanatory fact. It is a process that may have revealed the ultimate limitation of the current capacities for interpretation represented by both orthodox and heterodox approaches. This limitation is due to two objective facts: 1) the transformation of the “socialist market economy” into a new socioeconomic formation (NSEF), a process that has accelerated since the financial crisis of 2008—the emergence of this NSEF results from a series of institutional innovations designed to accommodate a myriad of modes of production, all of them under the leadership of the public (socialist) sector; and 2) the continuous technical progress achieved by the state-owned enterprises (SOEs). Following the successful implementation of proactive industrial policies, the above-mentioned developments led to the appearance in China of new and superior forms of economic planning. This process can be understood as the re-emergence of Ignacio Rangel’s “project economy,” now under the title of the “new projectment economy.” In our view, perceiving and understanding this change in the mode of production in China, and the theoretical resources involved in it, represents the greatest challenge before today’s social science.","PeriodicalId":41482,"journal":{"name":"World Review of Political Economy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Review of Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.13.4.0502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article aims to show that the Chinese development process over the past four decades is not a self-explanatory fact. It is a process that may have revealed the ultimate limitation of the current capacities for interpretation represented by both orthodox and heterodox approaches. This limitation is due to two objective facts: 1) the transformation of the “socialist market economy” into a new socioeconomic formation (NSEF), a process that has accelerated since the financial crisis of 2008—the emergence of this NSEF results from a series of institutional innovations designed to accommodate a myriad of modes of production, all of them under the leadership of the public (socialist) sector; and 2) the continuous technical progress achieved by the state-owned enterprises (SOEs). Following the successful implementation of proactive industrial policies, the above-mentioned developments led to the appearance in China of new and superior forms of economic planning. This process can be understood as the re-emergence of Ignacio Rangel’s “project economy,” now under the title of the “new projectment economy.” In our view, perceiving and understanding this change in the mode of production in China, and the theoretical resources involved in it, represents the greatest challenge before today’s social science.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论中国社会主义市场经济与“新项目经济”
本文旨在表明,中国过去40年的发展进程并不是一个不言自明的事实。这个过程可能已经揭示了当前以正统和非正统方法为代表的解释能力的最终局限性。这种限制是由于两个客观事实:1)“社会主义市场经济”向新的社会经济形态(NSEF)的转变,这一过程自2008年金融危机以来加速了——这种NSEF的出现源于一系列旨在适应无数生产方式的制度创新,所有这些生产方式都在公共(社会主义)部门的领导下;2)国有企业技术的不断进步。随着积极的产业政策的成功实施,上述发展导致中国出现了新的和更高级的经济计划形式。这个过程可以理解为伊格纳西奥·兰格尔(Ignacio Rangel)的“项目经济”的重新出现,现在被称为“新项目经济”。在我们看来,感知和理解中国生产方式的这种变化,以及与之相关的理论资源,是当今社会科学面临的最大挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
The Formalization of Marx’s Economics Understanding the “Service Economy”—A Marxist Critical Approach The Labor Theory of Value and the Problem of Joint Production A Comparison of Capital and Labor Incomes in Finance and Manufacturing Sectors in OECD Countries: 1995–2019 Analysis of the Imperial Rent of Reserve Currency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1