Future of Colorectal Cancer Screening: From One-Size-FITs-All to Tailor-Made

Tim L Kortlever, M. van der Vlugt, E. Dekker
{"title":"Future of Colorectal Cancer Screening: From One-Size-FITs-All to Tailor-Made","authors":"Tim L Kortlever, M. van der Vlugt, E. Dekker","doi":"10.3389/fgstr.2022.906052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) and its precursor lesions, advanced adenomas (AA), has been shown to effectively reduce CRC-related mortality. However, the method of CRC screening varies among countries. Primary colonoscopy screening is the most effective screening option from an individual point of view, but it is costly and population-wide participation rates are relatively low. Repeated screening with a fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is a non-invasive and inexpensive way to select individuals at high risk for CRC for colonoscopy. Despite its widespread use and mostly high participation rates, FIT is not perfect. Its sensitivity for advanced neoplasia (AN) is low. Besides, the false positivity rate of FIT is relatively high. This leads to unnecessary colonoscopies, anxiety, and risks among FIT-positives. New strategies need to be developed to improve CRC screening. In the past years, much research has been undertaken on risk-based screening or risk models. These include tests consisting of multiple risk factors and/or biomarkers that either assess the risk of disease at a single point in time (cross-sectional risk models) or predict the risk of developing CRC in the future (longitudinal risk models). We provide an overview of the developments on risk models for CRC screening and discuss some of the obstacles that need to be overcome to enable widespread implementation in existing CRC screening programs.","PeriodicalId":73085,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgstr.2022.906052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) and its precursor lesions, advanced adenomas (AA), has been shown to effectively reduce CRC-related mortality. However, the method of CRC screening varies among countries. Primary colonoscopy screening is the most effective screening option from an individual point of view, but it is costly and population-wide participation rates are relatively low. Repeated screening with a fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is a non-invasive and inexpensive way to select individuals at high risk for CRC for colonoscopy. Despite its widespread use and mostly high participation rates, FIT is not perfect. Its sensitivity for advanced neoplasia (AN) is low. Besides, the false positivity rate of FIT is relatively high. This leads to unnecessary colonoscopies, anxiety, and risks among FIT-positives. New strategies need to be developed to improve CRC screening. In the past years, much research has been undertaken on risk-based screening or risk models. These include tests consisting of multiple risk factors and/or biomarkers that either assess the risk of disease at a single point in time (cross-sectional risk models) or predict the risk of developing CRC in the future (longitudinal risk models). We provide an overview of the developments on risk models for CRC screening and discuss some of the obstacles that need to be overcome to enable widespread implementation in existing CRC screening programs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结直肠癌癌症筛查的未来:从一次全科到量体裁衣
对癌症(CRC)及其前病变、晚期腺瘤(AA)进行筛查已被证明可有效降低CRC相关死亡率。然而,CRC筛查的方法因国家而异。从个人角度来看,初级结肠镜筛查是最有效的筛查选择,但成本高昂,而且全人群的参与率相对较低。粪便免疫化学测试(FIT)的重复筛查是一种非侵入性且廉价的方法,可以选择CRC高危人群进行结肠镜检查。尽管FIT的使用范围很广,参与率也很高,但它并不完美。其对晚期肿瘤(AN)的敏感性较低。此外,FIT的假阳性率相对较高。这会导致不必要的结肠镜检查、焦虑和FIT阳性的风险。需要制定新的战略来改进CRC筛查。在过去几年中,对基于风险的筛查或风险模型进行了大量研究。其中包括由多种风险因素和/或生物标志物组成的测试,这些测试要么评估单个时间点的疾病风险(横断面风险模型),要么预测未来发展为CRC的风险(纵向风险模型)。我们概述了CRC筛查风险模型的发展,并讨论了需要克服的一些障碍,以使现有CRC筛查计划能够广泛实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Current status and clinical applications of tissue engineering of the gastrointestinal tract: a systematized narrative review Fecal microbiota transplantation—could stool donors’ and receptors’ diet be the key to future success? X-ray phase-contrast 3D virtual histology characterises complex tissue architecture in colorectal cancer Adalimumab biosimilar ABP 501 is equally effective and safe in long-term management of inflammatory bowel diseases patients when used as first biologic treatment or as replace of the ADA originator for a non-medical reason A blood-based transcriptomic signature stratifies severe Crohn’s disease and defines potentially targetable therapeutic pathways
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1