The influence of a Perspex intubation box on time to intubation: a simulation-based randomised crossover study

R. Swart, Cmj Strydom, G. Joubert
{"title":"The influence of a Perspex intubation box on time to intubation: a simulation-based randomised crossover study","authors":"R. Swart, Cmj Strydom, G. Joubert","doi":"10.36303/SAJAA.2021.27.1.2452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Standard personal protective equipment guidelines are insufficient to prevent contamination of healthcare workers with droplet spread during the COVID-19 crisis The added challenge of adequate aerosol protection has led to the development of an initial prototype intubation box The primary objective was to determine the impact of an intubation box on the mean time to completion of intubation in a simulated airway Secondary objectives included the best laryngoscopic view, the effect of intubator seniority and mode of laryngoscopy on intubation Methods: This was a randomised crossover study of the influence of an intubation box on mean time to completion of intubation of an airway management part-task trainer Senior anaesthesiology staff were assigned to two groups and recordings of their attempts at intubation were analysed by two independent observers Results: The intubation box led to a significantly longer mean time to completion of intubation of 7 6 seconds (95% CI 3 1;12 2;p = 0 001) with direct laryngoscopy and 9 2 seconds (95% CI 3 8;14 7;p = 0 001) with videolaryngoscopy It did not influence best glottic view Conclusion: We found that the use of an intubation box significantly prolonged the time to completion of intubation, but the clinical significance of the effect size is uncertain © 2021 The Author(s)","PeriodicalId":21769,"journal":{"name":"Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia","volume":"27 1","pages":"24-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36303/SAJAA.2021.27.1.2452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Standard personal protective equipment guidelines are insufficient to prevent contamination of healthcare workers with droplet spread during the COVID-19 crisis The added challenge of adequate aerosol protection has led to the development of an initial prototype intubation box The primary objective was to determine the impact of an intubation box on the mean time to completion of intubation in a simulated airway Secondary objectives included the best laryngoscopic view, the effect of intubator seniority and mode of laryngoscopy on intubation Methods: This was a randomised crossover study of the influence of an intubation box on mean time to completion of intubation of an airway management part-task trainer Senior anaesthesiology staff were assigned to two groups and recordings of their attempts at intubation were analysed by two independent observers Results: The intubation box led to a significantly longer mean time to completion of intubation of 7 6 seconds (95% CI 3 1;12 2;p = 0 001) with direct laryngoscopy and 9 2 seconds (95% CI 3 8;14 7;p = 0 001) with videolaryngoscopy It did not influence best glottic view Conclusion: We found that the use of an intubation box significantly prolonged the time to completion of intubation, but the clinical significance of the effect size is uncertain © 2021 The Author(s)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有机玻璃插管盒对插管时间的影响:一项基于模拟的随机交叉研究
背景:在COVID-19危机期间,标准的个人防护设备指南不足以防止液滴传播对医护人员的污染。适当的气溶胶防护带来的额外挑战促使人们开发了最初的原型插管盒。主要目标是确定插管盒对模拟气道插管平均完成时间的影响。次要目标包括最佳喉镜视图。方法:这是一项随机交叉研究,研究了插管箱对气道管理部分任务培训师平均插管完成时间的影响。将高级麻醉人员分为两组,由两名独立观察员分析他们插管尝试的记录。结果:插管框导致大大延长平均完成时间插管7 6秒(95%可信区间3 1;12 2;p = 0 001)与直接喉镜检查和9 2秒(95% CI 3 8; 14 7; p = 0 001)与videolaryngoscopy最好不影响语言的观点结论:我们发现一个插管框的使用显著延长时间完成插管,但临床意义的效果是不确定©2021年作者(年代)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
“Belt and braces”: prophylactic vasoconstrictors after spinal blocks in the elderly The profile of female anaesthesiologists in South Africa: past and present Leadership dynamics and gender transformation in anaesthesiology in South Africa When CO 2 goes wild – a tale of surgical emphysema, pneumothorax and a gas-filled adventure in laparoscopic hernia repair Optimal dose of phenylephrine infusion in the prevention of spinal anaesthesia-induced hypotension in elderly patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1