Management of Diabetes Patients across the Peri- Operative Pathway: A Systematic Review

Jennifer Wallace, S. Jiwani, Philemon Gyasi-Antwi, A. Meal, G. Adams
{"title":"Management of Diabetes Patients across the Peri- Operative Pathway: A Systematic Review","authors":"Jennifer Wallace, S. Jiwani, Philemon Gyasi-Antwi, A. Meal, G. Adams","doi":"10.31038/edmj.2020411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Peri-operative environments are a hazardous setting for diabetes patients. A systematic review of literature regarding the management of diabetes patients across the peri-operative pathway has been undertaken to assess if the management of patients within this pathway is suitable and effective for patients. Methods A database search of Google Scholar, CINAHAL, Embase, OVID, Cochrane Library, Joanna Briggs institute and PUBMED was undertaken from 15 th of March 2019 to 30 th of March 2019. A total of 57 papers were found and reduced down to 11 final papers that answered the review question and met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria were: Full text, English language, human subjects, adult patients only and studies that focused on diabetes care in a section of the peri-operative pathway. Exclusion criteria: children or adults and children, studies that looked a one particular intervention or type of surgery. No date limit was set. PICO tool was used to frame the study question. Results Three main themes emerged from the literature. 1. Poor patient outcomes; 2. Longer length of stay (LOS); 3. Lack of adherence to guidance and or protocols and glycaemic control. Elective patients had advantageous outcomes compared to emergency surgical patients. Hyperglycaemia still remained a problem with an increase in other medical complications for diabetes patients. LOS in hospital was found to have increased due to medical complications. Adherence to protocols and guidance was found to be beneficial in monitoring and managing hyperglycaemia. However, this review found that best practice guidance and hospital protocol is not always adhered to. A liberal approach to glycaemic control is beneficial. Conclusion This systematic review investigated the management of diabetes patients across the peri-operative pathway. Three main themes emerged from the literature: poor patient outcomes; length of stay; and lack of adherence to guidance and or protocols and glycaemic control. We concluded the peri-operative environment is a hazardous setting for a diabetes patients. Elective patients had slightly more advantageous outcomes than emergency patients. Hyperglycaemia still remains a problem which leads to poor patient outcomes and longer LOS. Adherence to protocols and guidance was found to be beneficial in monitoring and managing hyperglycaemia.","PeriodicalId":72911,"journal":{"name":"Endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31038/edmj.2020411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Peri-operative environments are a hazardous setting for diabetes patients. A systematic review of literature regarding the management of diabetes patients across the peri-operative pathway has been undertaken to assess if the management of patients within this pathway is suitable and effective for patients. Methods A database search of Google Scholar, CINAHAL, Embase, OVID, Cochrane Library, Joanna Briggs institute and PUBMED was undertaken from 15 th of March 2019 to 30 th of March 2019. A total of 57 papers were found and reduced down to 11 final papers that answered the review question and met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria were: Full text, English language, human subjects, adult patients only and studies that focused on diabetes care in a section of the peri-operative pathway. Exclusion criteria: children or adults and children, studies that looked a one particular intervention or type of surgery. No date limit was set. PICO tool was used to frame the study question. Results Three main themes emerged from the literature. 1. Poor patient outcomes; 2. Longer length of stay (LOS); 3. Lack of adherence to guidance and or protocols and glycaemic control. Elective patients had advantageous outcomes compared to emergency surgical patients. Hyperglycaemia still remained a problem with an increase in other medical complications for diabetes patients. LOS in hospital was found to have increased due to medical complications. Adherence to protocols and guidance was found to be beneficial in monitoring and managing hyperglycaemia. However, this review found that best practice guidance and hospital protocol is not always adhered to. A liberal approach to glycaemic control is beneficial. Conclusion This systematic review investigated the management of diabetes patients across the peri-operative pathway. Three main themes emerged from the literature: poor patient outcomes; length of stay; and lack of adherence to guidance and or protocols and glycaemic control. We concluded the peri-operative environment is a hazardous setting for a diabetes patients. Elective patients had slightly more advantageous outcomes than emergency patients. Hyperglycaemia still remains a problem which leads to poor patient outcomes and longer LOS. Adherence to protocols and guidance was found to be beneficial in monitoring and managing hyperglycaemia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
糖尿病患者围手术期的管理:一项系统综述
围手术期环境对糖尿病患者来说是一个危险的环境。对有关糖尿病患者围手术期管理的文献进行了系统综述,以评估该途径内的患者管理是否适合患者并有效。方法于2019年3月15日至3月30日对Google Scholar、CINAHAL、Embase、OVID、Cochrane Library、Joanna Briggs institute和PUBMED进行数据库搜索。共发现57篇论文,最终论文减少到11篇,这些论文回答了审查问题,符合纳入和排除标准。纳入标准为:全文、英语、人类受试者、仅限成年患者以及围手术期糖尿病护理研究。排除标准:儿童或成人和儿童,看起来是一种特定干预或手术类型的研究。没有设置日期限制。PICO工具用于构建研究问题。结果文献呈现出三大主题。1.患者预后不佳;2.更长的停留时间(LOS);3.缺乏对指导和/或方案以及血糖控制的遵守。与急诊手术患者相比,择期患者具有有利的结果。高血糖仍然是一个问题,糖尿病患者的其他并发症也在增加。医院的LOS由于医疗并发症而增加。研究发现,遵守方案和指导有利于监测和管理高血糖。然而,这篇综述发现,最佳实践指南和医院方案并不总是得到遵守。自由的血糖控制方法是有益的。结论本系统综述探讨了糖尿病患者围手术期的管理。文献中出现了三个主要主题:患者预后不佳;停留时间;以及缺乏对指导和/或方案以及血糖控制的遵守。我们得出结论,围手术期的环境对糖尿病患者来说是一个危险的环境。选择性患者的疗效略高于急诊患者。高血糖仍然是一个导致患者预后不佳和LOS延长的问题。研究发现,遵守方案和指导有利于监测和管理高血糖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pattern of Presentation of Newly Diagnosed Diabetes Mellitus Among Sudanese Patients The Role of Endocrine Mediators in the Neurodegeneration and Synaptic Dysfunction of Depressive Illness In their Own Language: Communicating Health to Boost Compliance for Weight Loss and Diabetes Modifiable Risk Factors and the Risk of Developing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Syndrome among Women with and without a History of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: An Ambidirectional Cohort Study from Pakistan Neuroprotective Effects of a Serotonin Receptor Peptide Following Sham vs. Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in the Zucker Rat.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1