Comparing subspecialty and intensive care providers perspectives on pediatric complex chronic patients: A survey study

Taylor A Kobussen, G. Hansen, Tanya R Holt
{"title":"Comparing subspecialty and intensive care providers perspectives on pediatric complex chronic patients: A survey study","authors":"Taylor A Kobussen, G. Hansen, Tanya R Holt","doi":"10.1177/20534345211068094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Pediatric complex chronic care patients present unique challenges regarding healthcare provision: complex medical regimes, complicated family/provider dynamics, and multiple healthcare teams that can result in inconsistent care. This study examined subspecialty providers’ perspectives regarding pediatric complex chronic care patients and compared them with acute care providers while exploring opportunities to better facilitate care provided to pediatric complex chronic care patients. Methods This survey study occurring within a Canadian tertiary care pediatric center, utilized REDCap to deploy surveys involving Likert Scale and short answer questions. The Kruskal–Wallis test compared subspecialty provider perspectives when providing care to pediatric complex chronic care patients versus non-pediatric complex chronic care patients; and perspectives between subspecialty and acute care providers. Results Survey response rate was 24/46 (52.2%). Eight overarching themes emerged from Likert scale questions. Short answer questions revealed factors that may facilitate care provided to pediatric complex chronic care patients: access to funding; discharge planning; communication methods between specialists; and healthcare provider continuity. Several differences were identified when working with pediatric complex chronic care patients, compared to non-pediatric complex chronic care patients: increased time/resource burden; managing expectations of patients/families; navigating discrepancies in goals of care; complexity of coordination between services; increased efforts in coordinating discharge from hospital and working with medicalized patients/families. Discussion Exploring pediatric subspecialty provider perspectives of pediatric complex chronic care patients revealed opportunities to enhance care provided: increased resources to ease the strain of care provision for parents, implementation of a discharge coordinator, complex care clinics with a pediatrician to “quarterback” care, and co-management between the complex care pediatrician and acute care physician when admitted to an acute care service. Implementation of these initiatives may improve the care provided to pediatric complex chronic care patients.","PeriodicalId":43751,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Care Coordination","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Care Coordination","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20534345211068094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction Pediatric complex chronic care patients present unique challenges regarding healthcare provision: complex medical regimes, complicated family/provider dynamics, and multiple healthcare teams that can result in inconsistent care. This study examined subspecialty providers’ perspectives regarding pediatric complex chronic care patients and compared them with acute care providers while exploring opportunities to better facilitate care provided to pediatric complex chronic care patients. Methods This survey study occurring within a Canadian tertiary care pediatric center, utilized REDCap to deploy surveys involving Likert Scale and short answer questions. The Kruskal–Wallis test compared subspecialty provider perspectives when providing care to pediatric complex chronic care patients versus non-pediatric complex chronic care patients; and perspectives between subspecialty and acute care providers. Results Survey response rate was 24/46 (52.2%). Eight overarching themes emerged from Likert scale questions. Short answer questions revealed factors that may facilitate care provided to pediatric complex chronic care patients: access to funding; discharge planning; communication methods between specialists; and healthcare provider continuity. Several differences were identified when working with pediatric complex chronic care patients, compared to non-pediatric complex chronic care patients: increased time/resource burden; managing expectations of patients/families; navigating discrepancies in goals of care; complexity of coordination between services; increased efforts in coordinating discharge from hospital and working with medicalized patients/families. Discussion Exploring pediatric subspecialty provider perspectives of pediatric complex chronic care patients revealed opportunities to enhance care provided: increased resources to ease the strain of care provision for parents, implementation of a discharge coordinator, complex care clinics with a pediatrician to “quarterback” care, and co-management between the complex care pediatrician and acute care physician when admitted to an acute care service. Implementation of these initiatives may improve the care provided to pediatric complex chronic care patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亚专科和重症监护提供者对儿科复杂慢性病患者的看法比较:一项调查研究
引言儿科复杂慢性护理患者在医疗保健方面面临着独特的挑战:复杂的医疗制度、复杂的家庭/提供者动态以及可能导致护理不一致的多个医疗团队。这项研究考察了亚专业提供者对儿科复杂慢性护理患者的看法,并将其与急性护理提供者进行了比较,同时探索更好地为儿科复杂慢性治疗患者提供护理的机会。方法这项调查研究发生在加拿大一家三级护理儿科中心,利用REDCap进行了涉及Likert量表和简短回答问题的调查。Kruskal–Wallis测试比较了亚专业提供者在为儿科复杂慢性护理患者和非儿科复杂慢性治疗患者提供护理时的观点;以及亚专业和急性护理提供者之间的观点。结果调查回答率为24/46(52.2%),Likert量表问题共有8个主题。简短的回答问题揭示了可能有助于为儿科复杂慢性护理患者提供护理的因素:获得资金;排放规划;专家之间的沟通方法;以及医疗保健提供者的连续性。与非儿科复杂慢性护理患者相比,在处理儿科复杂慢性治疗患者时发现了几个差异:时间/资源负担增加;管理患者/家属的期望;处理护理目标的差异;服务之间协调的复杂性;加大协调出院和与接受药物治疗的患者/家属合作的力度。讨论探讨儿科亚专业提供者对儿科复杂慢性护理患者的看法揭示了加强护理的机会:增加资源以缓解父母的护理压力,实施出院协调员,由儿科医生组成的复杂护理诊所进行“四分卫”护理,以及在接受急性护理服务时在复杂护理儿科医生和急性护理医师之间的共同管理。实施这些举措可能会改善为儿科复杂慢性护理患者提供的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Care Coordination (formerly published as the International Journal of Care Pathways) provides an international forum for the latest scientific research in care coordination. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles which describe basic research to a multidisciplinary field as well as other broader approaches and strategies hypothesized to improve care coordination. The Journal offers insightful overviews and reflections on innovation, underlying issues, and thought provoking opinion pieces in related fields. Articles from multidisciplinary fields are welcomed from leading health care academics and policy-makers. Published articles types include original research, reviews, guidelines papers, book reviews, and news items.
期刊最新文献
Primary care follow-up among children born with neonatal abstinence syndrome in a rural region in the United States Effectiveness of early care information transfer among home-dwelling frail elderly patients in Japan: A cluster randomized trial Nurses’ roles, views and knowledge regarding vaccines and vaccination: A pan-European survey Without unpaid carers the system would collapse Supporting rural health services through regional networks: Observations of a formalized model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1