Influence of Rice Husk Ash Fines on Geotechnical Properties of Lime Stabilized Lateritic Soil

IF 0.8 Q3 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Engineering Research in Africa Pub Date : 2022-07-25 DOI:10.4028/p-35mk32
F. Ayodele, B. Alo, A. Adetoro
{"title":"Influence of Rice Husk Ash Fines on Geotechnical Properties of Lime Stabilized Lateritic Soil","authors":"F. Ayodele, B. Alo, A. Adetoro","doi":"10.4028/p-35mk32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Different fines of rice husk ash (RHA) are typically used as a binder for soil stabilization. This study aims to assess the performance of RHA fines as a binder with lime in the improvement of plasticity and compaction characteristics of stabilized soil. Consistency limits, particle sieve analysis, and compaction tests were conducted on the natural lateritic soil, while consistency limits and compaction tests were conducted on the stabilized lateritic soil. The tests conformed to BS 1377 (1990). The chemical compositions of the RHA were assessed. Lateritic soil samples were mixed with lime in the proportions of 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10% by weight of dry soil. Plasticity Index (PI) was used as the determinant of optimum performance of lime-stabilized lateritic soil and this was obtained at 8% of lime addition. Thereafter, binder ratios (Lime: RHA) of 0:8, 2:6, 4:4, 6:2, and 8:0 were employed in the blending of the lateritic soil. The Plasticity Index (PI) of the stabilized soil were generally lowered to 7.82%, 21.36%, 18.97%, 19.71%, 15.03% when stabilized with BR2:675μm, BR4:475μm, BR6:275μm, BR2:6300μm and BR6:2300μm respectively. All binder ratios containing both lime and RHA size of 75 μm reduced the PI. Also, the effect of all binder ratios containing both lime and all RHA sizes showed increment in the Maximum Dry Density (MDD). Similarly, soil stabilized with BR2:6150μm, BR4:475μm, BR4:4150μm, BR4:4300μm, BR6:2150μm and BR6:2300μm offered a lowered OMC. 75μm RHA and BR4:475μm had the potential to improve Lime-RHA stabilized lateritic soil mixture especially for road application.","PeriodicalId":45925,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Engineering Research in Africa","volume":"61 1","pages":"217 - 230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Engineering Research in Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4028/p-35mk32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Different fines of rice husk ash (RHA) are typically used as a binder for soil stabilization. This study aims to assess the performance of RHA fines as a binder with lime in the improvement of plasticity and compaction characteristics of stabilized soil. Consistency limits, particle sieve analysis, and compaction tests were conducted on the natural lateritic soil, while consistency limits and compaction tests were conducted on the stabilized lateritic soil. The tests conformed to BS 1377 (1990). The chemical compositions of the RHA were assessed. Lateritic soil samples were mixed with lime in the proportions of 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10% by weight of dry soil. Plasticity Index (PI) was used as the determinant of optimum performance of lime-stabilized lateritic soil and this was obtained at 8% of lime addition. Thereafter, binder ratios (Lime: RHA) of 0:8, 2:6, 4:4, 6:2, and 8:0 were employed in the blending of the lateritic soil. The Plasticity Index (PI) of the stabilized soil were generally lowered to 7.82%, 21.36%, 18.97%, 19.71%, 15.03% when stabilized with BR2:675μm, BR4:475μm, BR6:275μm, BR2:6300μm and BR6:2300μm respectively. All binder ratios containing both lime and RHA size of 75 μm reduced the PI. Also, the effect of all binder ratios containing both lime and all RHA sizes showed increment in the Maximum Dry Density (MDD). Similarly, soil stabilized with BR2:6150μm, BR4:475μm, BR4:4150μm, BR4:4300μm, BR6:2150μm and BR6:2300μm offered a lowered OMC. 75μm RHA and BR4:475μm had the potential to improve Lime-RHA stabilized lateritic soil mixture especially for road application.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
稻壳粉对石灰稳定红土土岩土性能的影响
不同粒度的稻壳灰(RHA)通常用作土壤稳定的粘合剂。本研究旨在评估RHA细粒与石灰粘结剂在改善稳定土塑性和压实特性方面的性能。对天然红土进行稠度限、颗粒筛分析和压实试验,对稳定红土进行稠度限和压实试验。试验符合BS 1377(1990)。对RHA的化学成分进行了评价。红土样品与石灰按干土重量的2、4、6、8和10%的比例混合。以塑性指数(PI)作为石灰稳定红土最佳性能的决定因素,在石灰添加量为8%时得到了最佳性能。随后,采用0:8、2:6、4:4、6:2、8:0的粘结剂配比(石灰:RHA)对红土进行混合。BR2:675μm、BR4:475μm、BR6:275μm、BR2:6300μm和BR6:2300μm稳定土的塑性指数(PI)分别为7.82%、21.36%、18.97%、19.71%、15.03%。石灰和RHA粒径均为75 μm的粘合剂配比均降低了PI。同时,石灰和RHA配比对最大干密度(MDD)的影响均有所增加。同样,BR2:6150μm、BR4:475μm、BR4:4150μm、BR4:4300μm、BR6:2150μm和BR6:2300μm稳定的土壤OMC降低。75μm RHA和BR4:475μm具有改善石灰-RHA稳定红土混合物的潜力,特别是在道路应用中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: "International Journal of Engineering Research in Africa" is a peer-reviewed journal which is devoted to the publication of original scientific articles on research and development of engineering systems carried out in Africa and worldwide. We publish stand-alone papers by individual authors. The articles should be related to theoretical research or be based on practical study. Articles which are not from Africa should have the potential of contributing to its progress and development.
期刊最新文献
Incidental finding of an undifferentiated sarcoma during lower limb Doppler ultrasound: A case report. Comparative Analysis of Energy Production and Simulation Software for Photovoltaic Systems in Multiple Moroccan Sites Numerical Study of the Opening Angle Incidence in Michell-Banki Turbine’s Performance without Guide Blades Studying the Effects of Opening Size and Location on Punching Shear Resistance of Flat Slabs Using ANSYS V.19 Corrosion Rate Prediction in Oil and Gas Pipelines Based on Multiphase Flow Modelling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1