The value of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography (MRI/US)-fusion biopsy in clinically significant prostate cancer detection in patients with biopsy-naïve men according to PSA levels: A propensity score matching analysis

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Prostate International Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.prnil.2021.10.002
Hye J. Byun , Teak J. Shin , Wonho Jung , Ji Y. Ha , Byung H. Kim , Young H. Kim
{"title":"The value of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography (MRI/US)-fusion biopsy in clinically significant prostate cancer detection in patients with biopsy-naïve men according to PSA levels: A propensity score matching analysis","authors":"Hye J. Byun ,&nbsp;Teak J. Shin ,&nbsp;Wonho Jung ,&nbsp;Ji Y. Ha ,&nbsp;Byung H. Kim ,&nbsp;Young H. Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.prnil.2021.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To evaluate the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography (MRI/US) fusion biopsy in patients with biopsy-naïve men for varying prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. Since MRI can efficiently detect csPCa compared to standard transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided biopsy; however, the optimal PSA threshold for its use is unclear.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We retrospectively reviewed those who underwent MRI/US-fusion and standard biopsy from January 2016 to June 2018. Patients were divided into three groups: PSA &lt;4, 4–10, &gt;10 ng/mL. Propensity scoring was performed to balance the characteristics of the different biopsy groups, and the detection rate of csPCa was compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Data from a total of 670 males were included in the analysis (standard TRUS, <em>n</em> = 333; MRI/US fusion, <em>n</em> = 337). Prior to matching, patients who received MRI/US-fusion biopsy had lower prostate volume. Propensity score matching balanced this characteristic and generated a cohort comprising 195 patients from each group. In the matched cohort, patients with PSA 4–10 ng/mL had a significantly increased risk of csPCa by MRI/US-fusion vs. standard biopsy (35.0% vs. 26.6%, <em>P</em> = 0.033). However, patients with PSA &lt;4 ng/mL had csPCa found by MRI/US-fusion versus standard biopsy (12.0% vs. 16.0%, <em>P</em> = 0.342), whereas, patients with PSA &gt;10 ng/mL had csPCa found by MRI/US-fusion versus standard biopsy (78.0% vs. 80.0%, <em>P</em> = 0.596). In multivariate logistic analysis among patients with PSA 4-10 ng/mL, MRI/US-fusion biopsy (odds ratio: 2.46, 95% confidence interval = 1.31–4.60, <em>P</em> = 0.005) were significantly associated with a detection of csPCa.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Detection of csPCa by MRI/US-fusion biopsy is more efficient in patients with biopsy-naïve men with PSA 4–10 ng/mL. However, standard TRUS biopsy may identify csPCa in patients with PSA &lt;4 ng/mL and ≥10 ng/mL, emphasizing the importance of performing a standard biopsy in conjunction with MRI/US-fusion biopsy in such populations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20845,"journal":{"name":"Prostate International","volume":"10 1","pages":"Pages 45-49"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287888221000568/pdfft?md5=f2266bf86ec0532e58544250c43f8fbd&pid=1-s2.0-S2287888221000568-main.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostate International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287888221000568","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography (MRI/US) fusion biopsy in patients with biopsy-naïve men for varying prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. Since MRI can efficiently detect csPCa compared to standard transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided biopsy; however, the optimal PSA threshold for its use is unclear.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed those who underwent MRI/US-fusion and standard biopsy from January 2016 to June 2018. Patients were divided into three groups: PSA <4, 4–10, >10 ng/mL. Propensity scoring was performed to balance the characteristics of the different biopsy groups, and the detection rate of csPCa was compared.

Results

Data from a total of 670 males were included in the analysis (standard TRUS, n = 333; MRI/US fusion, n = 337). Prior to matching, patients who received MRI/US-fusion biopsy had lower prostate volume. Propensity score matching balanced this characteristic and generated a cohort comprising 195 patients from each group. In the matched cohort, patients with PSA 4–10 ng/mL had a significantly increased risk of csPCa by MRI/US-fusion vs. standard biopsy (35.0% vs. 26.6%, P = 0.033). However, patients with PSA <4 ng/mL had csPCa found by MRI/US-fusion versus standard biopsy (12.0% vs. 16.0%, P = 0.342), whereas, patients with PSA >10 ng/mL had csPCa found by MRI/US-fusion versus standard biopsy (78.0% vs. 80.0%, P = 0.596). In multivariate logistic analysis among patients with PSA 4-10 ng/mL, MRI/US-fusion biopsy (odds ratio: 2.46, 95% confidence interval = 1.31–4.60, P = 0.005) were significantly associated with a detection of csPCa.

Conclusions

Detection of csPCa by MRI/US-fusion biopsy is more efficient in patients with biopsy-naïve men with PSA 4–10 ng/mL. However, standard TRUS biopsy may identify csPCa in patients with PSA <4 ng/mL and ≥10 ng/mL, emphasizing the importance of performing a standard biopsy in conjunction with MRI/US-fusion biopsy in such populations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据PSA水平,磁共振成像和超声(MRI/US)融合活检在biopsy-naïve男性患者临床显著前列腺癌检测中的价值:倾向评分匹配分析
目的探讨不同前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平biopsy-naïve男性患者的磁共振与超声融合活检(MRI/US)对临床显著性前列腺癌(csPCa)的检出率。由于与标准经直肠超声(TRUS)引导活检相比,MRI可以有效地检测csPCa;然而,其使用的最佳PSA阈值尚不清楚。材料和方法我们回顾性分析了2016年1月至2018年6月期间接受MRI/ us融合和标准活检的患者。患者分为PSA 4、4 - 10、10 ng/mL三组。采用倾向评分来平衡不同活检组的特征,并比较csPCa的检出率。结果670例男性纳入分析(标准TRUS, n = 333;MRI/US融合,n = 337)。在匹配之前,接受MRI/ us融合活检的患者前列腺体积较低。倾向评分匹配平衡了这一特征,并产生了一个由每组195名患者组成的队列。在匹配的队列中,PSA为4-10 ng/mL的患者与标准活检相比,MRI/ us融合的csPCa风险显著增加(35.0%对26.6%,P = 0.033)。然而,与标准活检相比,PSA为4 ng/mL的患者MRI/ us融合发现的csPCa(12.0%比16.0%,P = 0.342),而PSA为10 ng/mL的患者MRI/ us融合发现的csPCa与标准活检相比(78.0%比80.0%,P = 0.596)。在PSA 4-10 ng/mL患者的多因素logistic分析中,MRI/ us融合活检(优势比:2.46,95%可信区间= 1.31-4.60,P = 0.005)与csPCa的检测显著相关。结论MRI/ us融合活检在PSA 4-10 ng/mL的biopsy-naïve男性患者中检测csPCa更有效。然而,标准的TRUS活检可以在PSA≤4ng /mL和≥10ng /mL的患者中发现csPCa,强调在这类人群中进行标准活检与MRI/ us融合活检的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Prostate International
Prostate International Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
26.70%
发文量
40
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Prostate International (Prostate Int, PI), the official English-language journal of Asian Pacific Prostate Society (APPS), is an international peer-reviewed academic journal dedicated to basic and clinical studies on prostate cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia, prostatitis, and ...
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to “Screening and validation of novel serum panel of microRNA in stratification of prostate cancer” [Prostate Int 11 (2023) 150–158] Current status and therapeutic value of extended pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer Negative magnetic resonance imaging cannot be used to omit an initial prostate biopsy - An ambispective study Utility of transperineal template-guided mapping prostate biopsy in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADS 1-2 on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging The association between inflammatory bowel disease and risk of prostate cancer: a population-based retrospective study based on Korean National Health Insurance Service database
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1