Managing technical changes from the scales of legal regulation: German clean cars against the European pollutant emissions regulations in the 1980s

IF 0.8 4区 管理学 Q1 HISTORY Management & Organizational History Pub Date : 2019-10-02 DOI:10.1080/17449359.2019.1702885
Samuel Klebaner, Sigfrido M. Ramírez Pérez
{"title":"Managing technical changes from the scales of legal regulation: German clean cars against the European pollutant emissions regulations in the 1980s","authors":"Samuel Klebaner, Sigfrido M. Ramírez Pérez","doi":"10.1080/17449359.2019.1702885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this paper, we analyze how public regulators and regulated businesses interpreted and influenced legal change implying technological shift. Based on the economics literature on technical change and legal history literature, we provide a constructivist and systematic framework to analyze law as mediation between regulators and firms’ respective behaviors. The analyzed historical case deals with the attempt of automobile multinationals to shape the European Economic Community vehicle emissions regulations. It focuses on the German fiscal policy to promote the sale of the so-called Clean Cars during the mid-1980s. We concluded that the regulation proposed by European Commission in the field of competition and environmental protection law successfully solved the clash between legitimate goals around emissions regulations. It covers implication in terms of normative order; political objectives coherency; firms’ profit strategies and relationships between firms and regulators through European trade associations. We find that the key factor of the firms’ positions to the law lies in information exchanged with political institutions, whose legal regulation acts as a signal integrated into the long-term firms’ strategies.","PeriodicalId":45724,"journal":{"name":"Management & Organizational History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17449359.2019.1702885","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management & Organizational History","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17449359.2019.1702885","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this paper, we analyze how public regulators and regulated businesses interpreted and influenced legal change implying technological shift. Based on the economics literature on technical change and legal history literature, we provide a constructivist and systematic framework to analyze law as mediation between regulators and firms’ respective behaviors. The analyzed historical case deals with the attempt of automobile multinationals to shape the European Economic Community vehicle emissions regulations. It focuses on the German fiscal policy to promote the sale of the so-called Clean Cars during the mid-1980s. We concluded that the regulation proposed by European Commission in the field of competition and environmental protection law successfully solved the clash between legitimate goals around emissions regulations. It covers implication in terms of normative order; political objectives coherency; firms’ profit strategies and relationships between firms and regulators through European trade associations. We find that the key factor of the firms’ positions to the law lies in information exchanged with political institutions, whose legal regulation acts as a signal integrated into the long-term firms’ strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从法律法规的尺度来管理技术变化:德国清洁汽车与20世纪80年代欧洲污染物排放法规的对比
摘要在本文中,我们分析了公共监管机构和受监管企业如何解释和影响意味着技术变革的法律变革。基于技术变革的经济学文献和法律史文献,我们提供了一个建构主义和系统的框架来分析法律作为监管者和企业各自行为之间的中介。分析的历史案例涉及汽车跨国公司试图制定欧洲经济共同体的汽车排放法规。它关注的是德国在20世纪80年代中期促进所谓清洁汽车销售的财政政策。我们得出的结论是,欧盟委员会在竞争和环境保护法领域提出的法规成功地解决了围绕排放法规的合法目标之间的冲突。它涵盖了规范秩序方面的含义;政治目标连贯性;企业的利润策略以及企业与欧洲贸易协会监管机构之间的关系。我们发现,企业对法律立场的关键因素在于与政治机构交换信息,政治机构的法律监管是企业长期战略的一个信号。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: Management & Organizational History (M&OH) is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that aims to publish high quality, original, academic research concerning historical approaches to the study of management, organizations and organizing. The journal addresses issues from all areas of management, organization studies, and related fields. The unifying theme of M&OH is its historical orientation. The journal is both empirical and theoretical. It seeks to advance innovative historical methods. It facilitates interdisciplinary dialogue, especially between business and management history and organization theory. The ethos of M&OH is reflective, ethical, imaginative, critical, inter-disciplinary, and international, as well as historical in orientation.
期刊最新文献
Budgetary control and beyond budgeting from a historical perspective - insights from re-visiting the 1922 book by James O. McKinsey Organizing Spanish-British mining companies: the case of “La Española”, 1866-1942 A non-conforming technocratic dream: Howard Scott’s technocracy movement Networks throughout an institutional transition: the case of the former Meliá touristic group (1932-1978) Form and media in management and organizational history how different research programs transform the ‘Past’ into ‘History’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1