Modeling Bayesian inspection game for non-performing loan problems

IF 3.7 4区 管理学 Q2 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE Operations Research Perspectives Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.orp.2021.100218
Erwin Widodo , Oryza Akbar Rochmadhan , Lukmandono , Januardi
{"title":"Modeling Bayesian inspection game for non-performing loan problems","authors":"Erwin Widodo ,&nbsp;Oryza Akbar Rochmadhan ,&nbsp;Lukmandono ,&nbsp;Januardi","doi":"10.1016/j.orp.2021.100218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study compiled a Bayesian inspection game as a branch in game theory to deal with non-performing loans (NPLs). Three types of games are analyzed, which are false alarm (FA), non-detection (ND), and bull's eye (BE). A Bayesian Nash equilibrium calculation process took place to formulate the player's strategy proportion. The equilibrium solution indicates the causative factors and develops the strategies to anticipate NPLs. The identified factors causing NPLs include customers' utility and disutility, inspection error in the form of false alarm and non-detection, operational costs to conduct an inspection, and bank utility related to inspection. The results showed that some examinations of type I and II errors to the game model could provide more comprehensive and interesting insights in managing NPL problems<em>.</em></p></div>","PeriodicalId":38055,"journal":{"name":"Operations Research Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214716021000324/pdfft?md5=0ab3fb08aff815832b5646c0e7e03b31&pid=1-s2.0-S2214716021000324-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operations Research Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214716021000324","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study compiled a Bayesian inspection game as a branch in game theory to deal with non-performing loans (NPLs). Three types of games are analyzed, which are false alarm (FA), non-detection (ND), and bull's eye (BE). A Bayesian Nash equilibrium calculation process took place to formulate the player's strategy proportion. The equilibrium solution indicates the causative factors and develops the strategies to anticipate NPLs. The identified factors causing NPLs include customers' utility and disutility, inspection error in the form of false alarm and non-detection, operational costs to conduct an inspection, and bank utility related to inspection. The results showed that some examinations of type I and II errors to the game model could provide more comprehensive and interesting insights in managing NPL problems.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不良贷款问题的贝叶斯检验对策建模
本研究编制了一个贝叶斯检查博弈作为博弈论的一个分支来处理不良贷款。本文分析了三种类型的游戏,即假警报(FA)、非检测(ND)和靶心(BE)。通过贝叶斯纳什均衡计算过程来确定玩家的策略比例。均衡解指出了不良贷款的成因,并制定了预测不良贷款的策略。已确定的导致不良贷款的因素包括客户的效用和负效用,以虚警和未检测形式出现的检查错误,进行检查的运营成本,以及与检查相关的银行效用。结果表明,对博弈模型的I型和II型错误的一些检查可以为管理不良实验室问题提供更全面和有趣的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Operations Research Perspectives
Operations Research Perspectives Mathematics-Statistics and Probability
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
27 days
期刊最新文献
Research on Green Supply Chain Finance Risk Identification based on Two-Stage Deep Learning Editorial Board ESG integration in portfolio selection: A robust preference-based multicriteria approach Ranking-based second stage in data envelopment analysis: An application to research efficiency in higher education Automated machine learning methodology for optimizing production processes in small and medium-sized enterprises
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1