Retropupillary iris-claw lens: Helpful or not?

Rahul Singh, Divya Ramraika, Seemee Kapadia, S. Agrawal, Moon Ramraika
{"title":"Retropupillary iris-claw lens: Helpful or not?","authors":"Rahul Singh, Divya Ramraika, Seemee Kapadia, S. Agrawal, Moon Ramraika","doi":"10.4103/mamcjms.mamcjms_1_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To evaluate the preoperative and intraoperative indications, postoperative complications, incidence of secondary glaucoma, and visual outcome in patient who underwent iris-claw implantation during cataract surgery and effect of vitrectomy on postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP). Material and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted from January 2016 to February 2020. One hundred eighty-seven eyes of 187 patients who underwent iris-claw lens implantation, with minimum 1 month follow-up, were included in the study. Analysis of records was done for preoperative, intraoperative findings and was recorded and postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and IOP were noted in each follow-up. Results: Mean preoperative BCVA of 187 eyes was 1.78 logMAR (SD 0.68), which increased to 0.61 ± 0.50, 0.36 ± 0.26, 0.21 ± 0.16 logMAR at postoperative day 1, day 7, and 1 month, respectively. Most common indications included phacodonesis (17.65%), small dilating and nondilating pupil (11.22%), zonular dialysis (6.41%), and pseudoexfoliation in (4.81%). Few patients (6.94%) had preexisting corneal pathologies which lend up in intraoperative complications that lead to iris-claw implantation. Mean IOP in vitrectomized eye after 1 month was 15.53 (SD 2.16) mm Hg and those of nonvitrectomized was 16 (SD 1.90) mm Hg. Posterior capsular rent and whole capsular bag loss were the most common intraoperative indications. Incidence of secondary glaucoma was 2.13%. Irregular pupil was the most common anterior segment finding at 1 month postoperatively. Conclusion: Retropupillary iris-claw implantation is one of the safe and least complicated methods of managing intraoperative complications which gives good visual acuity and prevent patient from the trauma of multiple surgeries.","PeriodicalId":32900,"journal":{"name":"MAMC Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MAMC Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/mamcjms.mamcjms_1_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the preoperative and intraoperative indications, postoperative complications, incidence of secondary glaucoma, and visual outcome in patient who underwent iris-claw implantation during cataract surgery and effect of vitrectomy on postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP). Material and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted from January 2016 to February 2020. One hundred eighty-seven eyes of 187 patients who underwent iris-claw lens implantation, with minimum 1 month follow-up, were included in the study. Analysis of records was done for preoperative, intraoperative findings and was recorded and postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and IOP were noted in each follow-up. Results: Mean preoperative BCVA of 187 eyes was 1.78 logMAR (SD 0.68), which increased to 0.61 ± 0.50, 0.36 ± 0.26, 0.21 ± 0.16 logMAR at postoperative day 1, day 7, and 1 month, respectively. Most common indications included phacodonesis (17.65%), small dilating and nondilating pupil (11.22%), zonular dialysis (6.41%), and pseudoexfoliation in (4.81%). Few patients (6.94%) had preexisting corneal pathologies which lend up in intraoperative complications that lead to iris-claw implantation. Mean IOP in vitrectomized eye after 1 month was 15.53 (SD 2.16) mm Hg and those of nonvitrectomized was 16 (SD 1.90) mm Hg. Posterior capsular rent and whole capsular bag loss were the most common intraoperative indications. Incidence of secondary glaucoma was 2.13%. Irregular pupil was the most common anterior segment finding at 1 month postoperatively. Conclusion: Retropupillary iris-claw implantation is one of the safe and least complicated methods of managing intraoperative complications which gives good visual acuity and prevent patient from the trauma of multiple surgeries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瞳孔后虹膜爪式晶状体:有用与否?
目的:探讨白内障手术行虹膜爪植入术患者的术前、术中指征、术后并发症、继发性青光眼的发生率、视力状况及玻璃体切除术对术后眼压的影响。材料与方法:2016年1月至2020年2月进行回顾性研究。187例行虹膜爪晶状体植入术的患者187只眼,随访至少1个月。分析术前、术中发现的记录,并记录术后最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和IOP。结果:187只眼术前BCVA均值为1.78 logMAR (SD 0.68),术后第1天、第7天、第1个月BCVA均值分别为0.61±0.50、0.36±0.26、0.21±0.16 logMAR。最常见的适应症包括瞳孔缩小(17.65%)、小扩张和不扩张瞳孔(11.22%)、带状透析(6.41%)和假脱落(4.81%)。少数患者(6.94%)术前存在角膜病变,导致术中并发症,导致虹膜爪状植入术。术后1个月玻璃体切除眼的平均IOP为15.53 (SD 2.16) mm Hg,未切除眼的平均IOP为16 (SD 1.90) mm Hg。手术中最常见的指征是后囊膜撕裂和全囊袋丢失。继发性青光眼的发生率为2.13%。不规则瞳孔是术后1个月最常见的前节发现。结论:瞳孔后虹膜爪植入术是一种安全、简单的术中并发症处理方法,能使患者获得良好的视力,避免多次手术的创伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
The clinical, sociodemographic, and pharmacotherapeutic characteristics influencing quality of life in patients with epilepsy Should planning of cervical pedicle screws be race specific? Computed tomography–based morphometric analysis A Prospective Clinical Evaluation of Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction in Infants and Children A randomized controlled study to compare the dose requirement of oxytocin for management of uterine atony in patients receiving prophylactic phenylephrine during caesarean delivery Artificial intelligence and healthcare
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1