Edge-Fog-Cloud Data Analysis for eHealth-IoT

IF 1.7 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering Pub Date : 2023-06-13 DOI:10.3991/ijoe.v19i07.38903
Chaimae Zaoui, F. Benabbou, Abdelaziz Ettaoufik
{"title":"Edge-Fog-Cloud Data Analysis for eHealth-IoT","authors":"Chaimae Zaoui, F. Benabbou, Abdelaziz Ettaoufik","doi":"10.3991/ijoe.v19i07.38903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thanks to advancements in artificial intelligence and the Internet of Things (IoT), eHealth is becoming an increasingly attractive area for researchers. However, different challenges arise when sensor-generated information is stored and analyzed using cloud computing. Latency, response time, and security are critical concerns that require attention. Fog and Edge Computing technologies have emerged in response to the requirement for resources near the network edge where data is collected, to minimize cloud challenges. This paper aims to assess the effectiveness of Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) techniques when executed in Edge or Fog nodes within the eHealth data. We compared the most efficient baseline techniques from the state-of-the-art on three eHealth datasets: Human Activity Recognition (HAR), University of Milano Bicocca Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition (UniMiB SHAR), and MIT-BIH Arrhythmia. The experiment showed that for the HAR dataset, the Support Vector Machines (SVM) model was the best performer among the ML techniques, with low processing time and an accuracy of 96%. In comparison, the K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) performed 94.43, and 96%, respectively, for SHAR and MIT-BIH datasets. Among the DL techniques, the Convolutional Neural Network with Fourier (CNNF) model performed the best, with accuracies of 94.49% and 98.72% for HAR and MIT-BIH. In comparison, CNN achieved 96.90% for the SHAR dataset. \n ","PeriodicalId":36900,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v19i07.38903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Thanks to advancements in artificial intelligence and the Internet of Things (IoT), eHealth is becoming an increasingly attractive area for researchers. However, different challenges arise when sensor-generated information is stored and analyzed using cloud computing. Latency, response time, and security are critical concerns that require attention. Fog and Edge Computing technologies have emerged in response to the requirement for resources near the network edge where data is collected, to minimize cloud challenges. This paper aims to assess the effectiveness of Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) techniques when executed in Edge or Fog nodes within the eHealth data. We compared the most efficient baseline techniques from the state-of-the-art on three eHealth datasets: Human Activity Recognition (HAR), University of Milano Bicocca Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition (UniMiB SHAR), and MIT-BIH Arrhythmia. The experiment showed that for the HAR dataset, the Support Vector Machines (SVM) model was the best performer among the ML techniques, with low processing time and an accuracy of 96%. In comparison, the K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) performed 94.43, and 96%, respectively, for SHAR and MIT-BIH datasets. Among the DL techniques, the Convolutional Neural Network with Fourier (CNNF) model performed the best, with accuracies of 94.49% and 98.72% for HAR and MIT-BIH. In comparison, CNN achieved 96.90% for the SHAR dataset.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
eHealth物联网的边缘雾云数据分析
由于人工智能和物联网(IoT)的进步,电子健康正成为研究人员越来越有吸引力的领域。然而,当使用云计算存储和分析传感器生成的信息时,会出现不同的挑战。延迟、响应时间和安全性是需要关注的关键问题。雾和边缘计算技术的出现是为了应对收集数据的网络边缘附近的资源需求,以最大限度地减少云挑战。本文旨在评估机器学习(ML)和深度学习(DL)技术在eHealth数据中的Edge或Fog节点中执行时的有效性。我们在三个eHealth数据集上比较了最先进的最有效的基线技术:人类活动识别(HAR)、米兰大学Bicocca智能手机人类活动识别系统(UniMiB SHAR)和MIT-BIH心律失常。实验表明,对于HAR数据集,支持向量机(SVM)模型是ML技术中表现最好的,处理时间较短,准确率为96%。相比之下,对于SHAR和MIT-BIH数据集,K-最近邻(KNN)分别执行了94.43%和96%。在DL技术中,具有傅立叶的卷积神经网络(CNNF)模型表现最好,HAR和MIT-BIH的准确率分别为94.49%和98.72%。相比之下,CNN对SHAR数据集的支持率为96.90%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
46.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Modification of an IMU Based System for Analyzing Hand Kinematics During Activities of Daily Living 3D Pre-Processing Algorithm for MRI Images of Different Stages of AD Segmentation of Retinal Images Using Improved Segmentation Network, MesU-Net Recent Biomaterial Developments for Bone Tissue Engineering and Potential Clinical Application: Narrative Review of the Literature Brain Tumor Localization Using N-Cut
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1