The doctoral writing conversation: establishing a generic doctoral writing programme

Q1 Arts and Humanities Open Review of Educational Research Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1080/23265507.2017.1419439
E. Johnson
{"title":"The doctoral writing conversation: establishing a generic doctoral writing programme","authors":"E. Johnson","doi":"10.1080/23265507.2017.1419439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Over the past few decades, the number of people enrolled in doctoral study has increased dramatically across the world. In practical terms, this has meant that universities now receive increasingly diverse students with regard to ethnicity, age, language, culture, and background preparedness for higher degree study. Students can, and often do, begin their doctorates with scant understanding of the precise expectations and rigorous demands of thesis writing. Yet, regardless of academic discipline, successful completion of a doctorate requires a written thesis. To help students master thesis writing requirements, a proliferation of self-help writing books, blogs, specific writing techniques, and programmes have emerged. This paper describes an approach developed at a New Zealand university where a generic doctoral writing programme, the Doctoral Writing Conversation, has evolved to make explicit to students the implicit language understanding that accomplished academic writers use to produce text. Utilising the idea of language as a tool to mediate understanding, the paper will explore how the programme is structured and functions but will also describe some of the insights I have gained along the way.","PeriodicalId":43562,"journal":{"name":"Open Review of Educational Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23265507.2017.1419439","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Review of Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23265507.2017.1419439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT Over the past few decades, the number of people enrolled in doctoral study has increased dramatically across the world. In practical terms, this has meant that universities now receive increasingly diverse students with regard to ethnicity, age, language, culture, and background preparedness for higher degree study. Students can, and often do, begin their doctorates with scant understanding of the precise expectations and rigorous demands of thesis writing. Yet, regardless of academic discipline, successful completion of a doctorate requires a written thesis. To help students master thesis writing requirements, a proliferation of self-help writing books, blogs, specific writing techniques, and programmes have emerged. This paper describes an approach developed at a New Zealand university where a generic doctoral writing programme, the Doctoral Writing Conversation, has evolved to make explicit to students the implicit language understanding that accomplished academic writers use to produce text. Utilising the idea of language as a tool to mediate understanding, the paper will explore how the programme is structured and functions but will also describe some of the insights I have gained along the way.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
博士写作对话:建立一个通用的博士写作计划
在过去的几十年里,世界范围内攻读博士学位的人数急剧增加。实际上,这意味着大学现在招收的学生在种族、年龄、语言、文化和背景方面越来越多样化,为更高的学位学习做准备。学生们可以,而且经常这样做,在开始攻读博士学位时,对论文写作的精确期望和严格要求知之甚少。然而,无论学科如何,成功完成博士学位都需要一篇书面论文。为了帮助学生掌握论文写作的要求,涌现了大量的自助写作书籍、博客、特定的写作技巧和课程。本文描述了新西兰一所大学开发的一种方法,在该方法中,一个通用的博士写作项目,博士写作对话,已经发展到向学生明确地解释有成就的学术作家在创作文本时使用的隐性语言理解。本文将利用语言作为调解理解的工具的概念,探讨该计划的结构和功能,但也将描述我在此过程中获得的一些见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Review of Educational Research
Open Review of Educational Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Experimenting with academic subjectivity: collective writing, peer production and collective intelligence What’s In a game? A game-based approach to exploring 21st-century European identity and values How to integrate addiction medicine in psychiatry training: results of an experiment with two educational methods Is peer review in academic publishing still working?* Love, attention and teaching: Dostoevsky's The Brothers Karamazov
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1