Comparison of deep learning and conventional machine learning methods for classification of colon polyp types

IF 1.2 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES The EuroBiotech Journal Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2478/ebtj-2021-0006
R. S. Doğan, B. Yılmaz
{"title":"Comparison of deep learning and conventional machine learning methods for classification of colon polyp types","authors":"R. S. Doğan, B. Yılmaz","doi":"10.2478/ebtj-2021-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Determination of polyp types requires tissue biopsy during colonoscopy and then histopathological examination of the microscopic images which tremendously time-consuming and costly. The first aim of this study was to design a computer-aided diagnosis system to classify polyp types using colonoscopy images (optical biopsy) without the need for tissue biopsy. For this purpose, two different approaches were designed based on conventional machine learning (ML) and deep learning. Firstly, classification was performed using random forest approach by means of the features obtained from the histogram of gradients descriptor. Secondly, simple convolutional neural networks (CNN) based architecture was built to train with the colonoscopy images containing colon polyps. The performances of these approaches on two (adenoma & serrated vs. hyperplastic) or three (adenoma vs. hyperplastic vs. serrated) category classifications were investigated. Furthermore, the effect of imaging modality on the classification was also examined using white-light and narrow band imaging systems. The performance of these approaches was compared with the results obtained by 3 novice and 4 expert doctors. Two-category classification results showed that conventional ML approach achieved significantly better than the simple CNN based approach did in both narrow band and white-light imaging modalities. The accuracy reached almost 95% for white-light imaging. This performance surpassed the correct classification rate of all 7 doctors. Additionally, the second task (three-category) results indicated that the simple CNN architecture outperformed both conventional ML based approaches and the doctors. This study shows the feasibility of using conventional machine learning or deep learning based approaches in automatic classification of colon types on colonoscopy images.","PeriodicalId":22379,"journal":{"name":"The EuroBiotech Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The EuroBiotech Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ebtj-2021-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Determination of polyp types requires tissue biopsy during colonoscopy and then histopathological examination of the microscopic images which tremendously time-consuming and costly. The first aim of this study was to design a computer-aided diagnosis system to classify polyp types using colonoscopy images (optical biopsy) without the need for tissue biopsy. For this purpose, two different approaches were designed based on conventional machine learning (ML) and deep learning. Firstly, classification was performed using random forest approach by means of the features obtained from the histogram of gradients descriptor. Secondly, simple convolutional neural networks (CNN) based architecture was built to train with the colonoscopy images containing colon polyps. The performances of these approaches on two (adenoma & serrated vs. hyperplastic) or three (adenoma vs. hyperplastic vs. serrated) category classifications were investigated. Furthermore, the effect of imaging modality on the classification was also examined using white-light and narrow band imaging systems. The performance of these approaches was compared with the results obtained by 3 novice and 4 expert doctors. Two-category classification results showed that conventional ML approach achieved significantly better than the simple CNN based approach did in both narrow band and white-light imaging modalities. The accuracy reached almost 95% for white-light imaging. This performance surpassed the correct classification rate of all 7 doctors. Additionally, the second task (three-category) results indicated that the simple CNN architecture outperformed both conventional ML based approaches and the doctors. This study shows the feasibility of using conventional machine learning or deep learning based approaches in automatic classification of colon types on colonoscopy images.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
深度学习与传统机器学习方法在结肠息肉类型分类中的比较
息肉类型的确定需要在结肠镜检查时进行组织活检,然后对显微镜图像进行组织病理学检查,这非常耗时且昂贵。本研究的第一个目的是设计一个计算机辅助诊断系统,使用结肠镜检查图像(光学活检)来分类息肉类型,而无需组织活检。为此,基于传统机器学习(ML)和深度学习设计了两种不同的方法。首先,利用梯度描述子直方图得到的特征,采用随机森林方法进行分类;其次,建立基于简单卷积神经网络(CNN)的架构,对包含结肠息肉的结肠镜图像进行训练;研究了这些入路在两种(腺瘤&锯齿状vs增生性)或三种(腺瘤&增生性vs锯齿状)分类上的表现。此外,利用白光和窄带成像系统研究了成像方式对分类的影响。将这些方法的性能与3名新手和4名专家医生的结果进行比较。两类分类结果表明,在窄带和白光成像模式下,传统的ML方法都明显优于基于简单CNN的方法。白光成像的精度几乎达到95%。这一表现超过了7位医生的正确分类率。此外,第二个任务(三类)的结果表明,简单的CNN架构优于传统的基于ML的方法和医生。这项研究表明,使用传统的机器学习或基于深度学习的方法在结肠镜检查图像上自动分类结肠类型是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The EuroBiotech Journal
The EuroBiotech Journal Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Artificial cells: A potentially groundbreaking field of research and therapy Germination and early seedling growth in four Plantago species in response to Zn, Cu and Fe Different Level of Tolerance to Herbicides is Displayed by Triticum aestivum L. Cultivars Depending on Herbicide Category and Mode of Application Efficacy of Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae against wheat aphid Comparative effect of probiotic and antibiotic on honey bees colony functional traits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1