Traditional values, family, homeschooling: The role of Russia and the Russian Orthodox Church in transnational moral conservative networks and their efforts at reshaping human rights

IF 1.1 3区 社会学 Q2 LAW Icon-International Journal of Constitutional Law Pub Date : 2023-05-03 DOI:10.1093/icon/moad026
K. Stoeckl
{"title":"Traditional values, family, homeschooling: The role of Russia and the Russian Orthodox Church in transnational moral conservative networks and their efforts at reshaping human rights","authors":"K. Stoeckl","doi":"10.1093/icon/moad026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In the last two decades, Russian state actors and the Russian Orthodox Church have come to play an increasingly important role in the undermining of established understandings of international human rights law by reinterpreting its aims and repurposing its institutions, in particular the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the United Nations Human Rights Council, and the European Court of Human Rights. Russian state and church leaders have appropriated and coopted the language of human rights in order to advance an illiberal and nationalist agenda that undercuts democratic values and targets particular groups and their rights and freedoms—most notably liberal civil society, political opposition, and the LGBTIQ+ community. Written from the angle of a constructivist sociology of human rights, this article brings together three case studies of Russian rights appropriation around the topics of traditional values, family, and homeschooling and draws six lessons on the (mis)appropriation of human rights for illiberal purposes. The analysis of Russia’s rights appropriation sheds light on the background and build-up for current events in Russia’s war against Ukraine.","PeriodicalId":51599,"journal":{"name":"Icon-International Journal of Constitutional Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Icon-International Journal of Constitutional Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moad026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the last two decades, Russian state actors and the Russian Orthodox Church have come to play an increasingly important role in the undermining of established understandings of international human rights law by reinterpreting its aims and repurposing its institutions, in particular the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the United Nations Human Rights Council, and the European Court of Human Rights. Russian state and church leaders have appropriated and coopted the language of human rights in order to advance an illiberal and nationalist agenda that undercuts democratic values and targets particular groups and their rights and freedoms—most notably liberal civil society, political opposition, and the LGBTIQ+ community. Written from the angle of a constructivist sociology of human rights, this article brings together three case studies of Russian rights appropriation around the topics of traditional values, family, and homeschooling and draws six lessons on the (mis)appropriation of human rights for illiberal purposes. The analysis of Russia’s rights appropriation sheds light on the background and build-up for current events in Russia’s war against Ukraine.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
传统价值观,家庭,家庭教育:俄罗斯和俄罗斯东正教会在跨国道德保守网络中的作用及其重塑人权的努力
在过去的二十年里,俄罗斯国家行为体和俄罗斯东正教会通过重新解释国际人权法的目标和重新定义其机构,特别是《世界人权宣言》、联合国人权理事会和欧洲人权法院,在破坏对国际人权法的既定理解方面发挥了越来越重要的作用。俄罗斯政府和教会领导人挪用并采纳了人权的语言,以推进一种破坏民主价值观的非自由主义和民族主义议程,并针对特定群体及其权利和自由——最明显的是自由主义公民社会、政治反对派和LGBTIQ+社区。本文从建构主义人权社会学的角度出发,围绕传统价值观、家庭和家庭教育的主题,汇集了三个关于俄罗斯权利挪用的案例研究,并总结了出于非自由目的而(错误地)挪用人权的六个教训。对俄罗斯侵占人权的分析,揭示了俄罗斯对乌克兰战争中当前事件的背景和积累。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
67
期刊最新文献
Can the people exercise constituent power? Route 66: Mutations of the internal market explored through the prism of citation networks Parallel incorporation and public law Naming and (mis)informing in academic publications The political economy of effective judicial remedies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1