Exploring teacher–student communication in senior-education contexts in Taiwan: A communication accommodation approach

Chin-hui Chen
{"title":"Exploring teacher–student communication in senior-education contexts in Taiwan: A communication accommodation approach","authors":"Chin-hui Chen","doi":"10.3384/IJAL.1652-8670.17369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated the language-accommodation strategies used by Taiwanese teachers when communicating with older adults in senior-education contexts. First, the interview phase identified various communication strategies and their underlying rationales; second, the survey phase verified the degree to which the identified communication strategies were used, as well as their associations with teachers’ age differences. The identified communication strategies were divided into four broad categories: secondary baby talk, mitigation of references to death or illness, politeness strategies and code selection (use of the dialect preferred by older students). The underlying considerations included older students’ perceived age-related physical or cognitive decrements, their social backgrounds and socio-psychological needs, as well as the teachers’ self-determined relational positioning or priority in the communication process. Young and middle-aged teachers were more likely to experience a deep-rooted conflict and power struggle arising from the fact that a teacher in Taiwan is traditionally endowed with greater power than his or her students, whereas younger people are expected to show respect to their elders. Hence, they frequently chose to address older students using forms that implied intergenerational relationships and to use code-switching to converge their own communication with their older students’ preferred dialects. Implications for older-adult education and possible directions for further research are discussed in the conclusion.","PeriodicalId":39906,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Ageing and Later Life","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Ageing and Later Life","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3384/IJAL.1652-8670.17369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This study investigated the language-accommodation strategies used by Taiwanese teachers when communicating with older adults in senior-education contexts. First, the interview phase identified various communication strategies and their underlying rationales; second, the survey phase verified the degree to which the identified communication strategies were used, as well as their associations with teachers’ age differences. The identified communication strategies were divided into four broad categories: secondary baby talk, mitigation of references to death or illness, politeness strategies and code selection (use of the dialect preferred by older students). The underlying considerations included older students’ perceived age-related physical or cognitive decrements, their social backgrounds and socio-psychological needs, as well as the teachers’ self-determined relational positioning or priority in the communication process. Young and middle-aged teachers were more likely to experience a deep-rooted conflict and power struggle arising from the fact that a teacher in Taiwan is traditionally endowed with greater power than his or her students, whereas younger people are expected to show respect to their elders. Hence, they frequently chose to address older students using forms that implied intergenerational relationships and to use code-switching to converge their own communication with their older students’ preferred dialects. Implications for older-adult education and possible directions for further research are discussed in the conclusion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
台湾老年教育背景下的师生沟通探索:沟通协调方法
本研究旨在探讨台湾教师在高中教育情境下与年长成人沟通时所使用的语言适应策略。首先,面试阶段确定了各种沟通策略及其基本原理;其次,调查阶段验证了所确定的沟通策略的使用程度,以及它们与教师年龄差异的关联。已确定的交流策略分为四大类:次要的婴儿语,减少提及死亡或疾病,礼貌策略和代码选择(使用年龄较大的学生喜欢的方言)。潜在的考虑因素包括大龄学生感知到的与年龄相关的身体或认知衰退,他们的社会背景和社会心理需求,以及教师在沟通过程中自我确定的关系定位或优先级。青年和中年教师更容易经历根深蒂固的冲突和权力斗争,因为在台湾,教师传统上被赋予比学生更大的权力,而年轻人则被要求尊重长辈。因此,他们经常选择使用暗示代际关系的形式来称呼年长的学生,并使用语码转换将自己的交流与年长学生喜欢的方言融合在一起。结论部分对老年教育的启示和可能的进一步研究方向进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Ageing and Later Life
International Journal of Ageing and Later Life Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Ageing and Later Life (IJAL) serves an audience interested in social and cultural aspects of ageing and later life development. As such, the Journal welcomes contributions that aim at advancing the theoretical and conceptual debate on research on ageing and later life. Contributions based on empirical work are also welcome as are methodologically interested discussions of relevance to the study of ageing and later life. Being an international journal, IJAL acknowledges the need to understand the cultural diversity and context dependency of ageing and later life.
期刊最新文献
Fostering collective impact in arts-based interventions and cultural programs for creative well-being of older adults Contextual barriers to artistic practices among older people: How do older artists perceive them? Life events and the experience of quality of life among residents of senior housing in Finland What do the papers say? The role of older adults in 20 years of digital inclusion debate in Dutch and Flemish newspapers Vital involvement versus ultimate confusion: two contrasting portrayals of dementia in the movies The Father and Floride
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1