Two Remarks on Michael Attaleiates’ Account of the Preliminaries to the Battle of Mantzikert†

IF 0.1 3区 历史学 N/A CLASSICS Symbolae Osloenses Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1080/00397679.2017.1323715
Antonios Vratimos
{"title":"Two Remarks on Michael Attaleiates’ Account of the Preliminaries to the Battle of Mantzikert†","authors":"Antonios Vratimos","doi":"10.1080/00397679.2017.1323715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ability to extract fully the contextualized interpretations of Michael Attaleiates’ Historia is a rather difficult task without the parallel study of sources chronicling the same period. This article reconsiders Attaleiates’ justification for the division of the army by Diogenes before the battle of Mantzikert in 1071, and argues that the author is as critical of this emperor’s strategy as his close contemporary, Psellos, though his criticism is more subtly formulated. Another section discusses a gap in the narrative structure of the Historia and goes on to fill it with information derived from the Hyle Historias of Bryennios and from the chronicles of al-Bundari and Ibn al-‘Adim.","PeriodicalId":41733,"journal":{"name":"Symbolae Osloenses","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00397679.2017.1323715","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Symbolae Osloenses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00397679.2017.1323715","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ability to extract fully the contextualized interpretations of Michael Attaleiates’ Historia is a rather difficult task without the parallel study of sources chronicling the same period. This article reconsiders Attaleiates’ justification for the division of the army by Diogenes before the battle of Mantzikert in 1071, and argues that the author is as critical of this emperor’s strategy as his close contemporary, Psellos, though his criticism is more subtly formulated. Another section discusses a gap in the narrative structure of the Historia and goes on to fill it with information derived from the Hyle Historias of Bryennios and from the chronicles of al-Bundari and Ibn al-‘Adim.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于Michael Attaleiates关于Mantzikert战役前奏的记述的两点注†
如果没有对同一时期的编年史资料进行平行研究,要充分提取出对迈克尔·阿塔利亚的《历史》的语境化解释是一项相当困难的任务。这篇文章重新考虑了阿塔利亚对第欧根尼在1071年曼齐克特战役之前分裂军队的理由,并认为作者对这位皇帝的战略的批评与他的密友普塞洛斯一样,尽管他的批评更为微妙。另一部分讨论了《历史》叙事结构中的一个空白,并继续用布里尼奥斯的《历史》以及本达里和伊本·阿尔·阿迪姆的编年史中的信息来填补这个空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Symbolae Osloenses
Symbolae Osloenses CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊最新文献
Departments of Greek and Latin Studies in Norwegian Universities Contributors’ Addresses Editorial Note Critical Notes on Pseudo-Sisbert’s Exhortatio Poenitendi On the Authorship of Pseudo-Archilochus, Frr. 327–328 W2 (290–291 Τ.)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1