Comparing frequencies of asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

IF 1 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Egyptian Journal of Bronchology Pub Date : 2019-07-01 DOI:10.4103/ejb.ejb_1_19
Nezar R. Mohamed, M. Abd El Hakim, Z. Saeed, R. Helmy
{"title":"Comparing frequencies of asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease","authors":"Nezar R. Mohamed, M. Abd El Hakim, Z. Saeed, R. Helmy","doi":"10.4103/ejb.ejb_1_19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may share some physiological features and coexist as asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap (ACO). The prevalence of ACO differs according to the diagnostic criteria and study design. In patients with COPD, the prevalence of ACO varies from 5 to 55%. This study aims to examine the effect of using different diagnostic criteria on the resulting frequency of ACO in patients with COPD. Settings and design This cross-sectional observational study enrolled 60 patients with COPD randomly selected from outpatient clinics of Chest Department of Minia Cardio-Thoracic University Hospital during the period from September 2015 to September 2016. Patients and methods History, clinical examination, spirometry, and sputum cytology were done. The frequency of ACO among the 60 patients with stable COPD was separately studied based on five different diagnostic criteria (Hardin’s, Menezes, combined Hardin and Menezes, Spanish consensus, and Global Initiative for Asthma-Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease criteria). Statistical analysis Statistical analysis was performed using statistical package for social science software (χ2 test and independent sample t test). Results The frequency of ACO in COPD was 40, 23.3, 16.7, 13.3, and 10% on applying combined Hardin and Menezes, Hardin’s alone, Menezes alone, the Spanish consensus, and Global Initiative for Asthma-Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease criteria, respectively. Conclusion The frequency of ACO in patients with COPD decreases when using more restrictive diagnostic criteria.","PeriodicalId":34128,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Bronchology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Bronchology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejb.ejb_1_19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may share some physiological features and coexist as asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap (ACO). The prevalence of ACO differs according to the diagnostic criteria and study design. In patients with COPD, the prevalence of ACO varies from 5 to 55%. This study aims to examine the effect of using different diagnostic criteria on the resulting frequency of ACO in patients with COPD. Settings and design This cross-sectional observational study enrolled 60 patients with COPD randomly selected from outpatient clinics of Chest Department of Minia Cardio-Thoracic University Hospital during the period from September 2015 to September 2016. Patients and methods History, clinical examination, spirometry, and sputum cytology were done. The frequency of ACO among the 60 patients with stable COPD was separately studied based on five different diagnostic criteria (Hardin’s, Menezes, combined Hardin and Menezes, Spanish consensus, and Global Initiative for Asthma-Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease criteria). Statistical analysis Statistical analysis was performed using statistical package for social science software (χ2 test and independent sample t test). Results The frequency of ACO in COPD was 40, 23.3, 16.7, 13.3, and 10% on applying combined Hardin and Menezes, Hardin’s alone, Menezes alone, the Spanish consensus, and Global Initiative for Asthma-Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease criteria, respectively. Conclusion The frequency of ACO in patients with COPD decreases when using more restrictive diagnostic criteria.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
稳定期慢性阻塞性肺病患者哮喘-慢性阻塞性肺疾病重叠频率的比较
背景哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)可能有一些共同的生理特征,并作为哮喘-慢性阻塞性肺疾病重叠(ACO)共存。ACO的患病率因诊断标准和研究设计而异。在COPD患者中,ACO的患病率从5%到55%不等。本研究旨在检验使用不同诊断标准对COPD患者ACO发生频率的影响。设置和设计本横断面观察性研究纳入了2015年9月至2016年9月期间从Minia心胸大学医院胸科门诊随机选择的60名COPD患者。患者和方法进行病史、临床检查、肺活量测定和痰细胞学检查。根据五种不同的诊断标准(Hardin’s、Menezes、Hardin和Menezes组合、西班牙共识和哮喘全球倡议慢性阻塞性肺病全球倡议标准),分别研究了60名稳定期COPD患者的ACO频率。统计分析使用社会科学软件的统计包进行统计分析(χ2检验和独立样本t检验)。结果COPD患者ACO的发生率分别为40%、23.3%、16.7%、13.3%和10%。结论采用更严格的诊断标准可降低COPD患者ACO的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Egyptian Journal of Bronchology
Egyptian Journal of Bronchology RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
自引率
7.70%
发文量
56
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessment of atypical pneumonia by chest ultrasonography Safety and efficacy of high flow nasal canula in patients with mild hypercapnia Impact of comorbid pulmonary disease on COVID-19 disease severity and outcome: a retrospective cohort study Imaging changes of oil aspiration over time in children: a case series Diagnostic yield of combined ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and core needle biopsy versus either technique alone in peripheral lung and pleural lesions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1