An Investigation of Long-Distance Relationship Maintenance in Married Individuals in Tehran, 2020

IF 0.9 4区 心理学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES American Journal of Family Therapy Pub Date : 2021-07-23 DOI:10.1080/01926187.2021.1941419
Meysam Bazani, M. Bakhtiari, Abbas Masjedi Arani
{"title":"An Investigation of Long-Distance Relationship Maintenance in Married Individuals in Tehran, 2020","authors":"Meysam Bazani, M. Bakhtiari, Abbas Masjedi Arani","doi":"10.1080/01926187.2021.1941419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study investigated relationship maintenance behaviors in a sample of 451 married individuals in Tehran and was conducted as an online survey. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that, unlike intrapersonal and dyadic behaviors, social network behaviors did not have an acceptable factor loading. The regression model showed that dyadic behaviors at all three levels including before separation, during separation, and after separation could positively predict good relationship quality. Individual behaviors during separation and after separation predicted it positively and negatively, respectively. Social network behaviors could not predict relationship quality at any level. The implications of these findings are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47263,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Family Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01926187.2021.1941419","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Family Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2021.1941419","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This study investigated relationship maintenance behaviors in a sample of 451 married individuals in Tehran and was conducted as an online survey. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that, unlike intrapersonal and dyadic behaviors, social network behaviors did not have an acceptable factor loading. The regression model showed that dyadic behaviors at all three levels including before separation, during separation, and after separation could positively predict good relationship quality. Individual behaviors during separation and after separation predicted it positively and negatively, respectively. Social network behaviors could not predict relationship quality at any level. The implications of these findings are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2020年德黑兰已婚人士保持远距离关系的调查
摘要本研究以德黑兰451名已婚人士为样本,调查了他们的关系维持行为,并作为一项在线调查进行。验证性因素分析表明,与人际行为和二元行为不同,社交网络行为没有可接受的因素负荷。回归模型表明,在分离前、分离中和分离后的三个层面上的二元行为都能正向预测良好的关系质量。分离期间和分离后的个体行为分别对其做出了积极和消极的预测。社交网络行为在任何层面上都无法预测关系质量。讨论了这些发现的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Family Therapy continues to be the incisive, authoritative, independent voice in an ever-changing field. You will find the latest techniques for treating families; theory on normal and dysfunctional family relationships; research on sexuality and intimacy; the effects of traditional and alternative family styles; community approaches to family intervention; and more.
期刊最新文献
School-Based Family Counseling for Crisis and Disaster: Global Perspectives Investigating the Mediating Role of Self-Differentiation and Emotion Regulation in the Relationship between Dyadic Perfectionism and Marital Satisfaction Treating Adolescent OCD: Recommendations for Systemic Clinical Competence The Process of Using the Self of the Therapist in EFT: A Grounded Theory Study Couple Relationship Education Through mHealth: A Two-Year Follow-Up Quasi-Experimental Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1