Editorial

IF 1.2 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Residential Treatment for Children & Youth Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI:10.1080/0886571X.2020.1805393
P. Mcnamara, Kristin Duppong Hurley
{"title":"Editorial","authors":"P. Mcnamara, Kristin Duppong Hurley","doi":"10.1080/0886571X.2020.1805393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While this collection of papers on family partnering was in development, life within children’s residential services was very different from the present reality. Arrival of the COVID19 pandemic has impacted residential programs for children, young people and their families around the globe in myriad ways. Anecdotally, we learn that virtual communication has improved regularity of contact and enhanced connectedness between some children and their families. However, for others, social distancing and isolation have proved challenging and re-triggered past trauma. Serious illness in family members, caregivers and teachers has been greatly distressing; too often this culminates in intense grief with the loss of loved ones. Such experiences can create even greater obstacles to repairing family disruption and healing trauma than those evident prior to the pandemic. Papers included in this special issue of Residential Treatment for Children and Youth address effective partnering with families in residential care programs operating within child welfare systems in Australia and the United States. Collectively, the approaches described appear consistent with the rationale underpinning the Family Engagement Inventory (FEI) Child Welfare theme (Children’s Bureau, Administration for Children and Families, US Department of Health and Human Services, 2015): ‘ . . . meaningful family engagement contributes not only to the well-being of the child and the family, but also to the well-being of the community’. The FEI standpoint has much in common with privileging of family partnering within the International Consensus Statement on Therapeutic Residential Care (Whittaker et al., 2016); the essence of this is encapsulated in the following excerpts: ‘Our vision of therapeutic residential care is integrally linked with the spirit of partnership between the families we seek to serve and our total staff complement. . . . (that is) to strive constantly to forge and maintain strong and vital family linkages . . .. Effective and humane therapeutic residential care is best seen as a support to families who are struggling, rather than as a substitute for families who have failed (Geurts et al., 2012).’ The robust conviction manifest in these and similar contemporary sources, along with a burgeoning international literature, suggest that the sector is largely persuaded of the importance of family partnering to achievement of best practice and good outcomes from residential care. However, papers in this Special Issue reveal that important challenges remain in developing, resourcing and implementing effective family partnering in the field. True RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT FOR CHILDREN & YOUTH 2020, VOL. 37, NO. 4, 265–268 https://doi.org/10.1080/0886571X.2020.1805393","PeriodicalId":45491,"journal":{"name":"Residential Treatment for Children & Youth","volume":"37 1","pages":"265 - 268"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0886571X.2020.1805393","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Residential Treatment for Children & Youth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0886571X.2020.1805393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While this collection of papers on family partnering was in development, life within children’s residential services was very different from the present reality. Arrival of the COVID19 pandemic has impacted residential programs for children, young people and their families around the globe in myriad ways. Anecdotally, we learn that virtual communication has improved regularity of contact and enhanced connectedness between some children and their families. However, for others, social distancing and isolation have proved challenging and re-triggered past trauma. Serious illness in family members, caregivers and teachers has been greatly distressing; too often this culminates in intense grief with the loss of loved ones. Such experiences can create even greater obstacles to repairing family disruption and healing trauma than those evident prior to the pandemic. Papers included in this special issue of Residential Treatment for Children and Youth address effective partnering with families in residential care programs operating within child welfare systems in Australia and the United States. Collectively, the approaches described appear consistent with the rationale underpinning the Family Engagement Inventory (FEI) Child Welfare theme (Children’s Bureau, Administration for Children and Families, US Department of Health and Human Services, 2015): ‘ . . . meaningful family engagement contributes not only to the well-being of the child and the family, but also to the well-being of the community’. The FEI standpoint has much in common with privileging of family partnering within the International Consensus Statement on Therapeutic Residential Care (Whittaker et al., 2016); the essence of this is encapsulated in the following excerpts: ‘Our vision of therapeutic residential care is integrally linked with the spirit of partnership between the families we seek to serve and our total staff complement. . . . (that is) to strive constantly to forge and maintain strong and vital family linkages . . .. Effective and humane therapeutic residential care is best seen as a support to families who are struggling, rather than as a substitute for families who have failed (Geurts et al., 2012).’ The robust conviction manifest in these and similar contemporary sources, along with a burgeoning international literature, suggest that the sector is largely persuaded of the importance of family partnering to achievement of best practice and good outcomes from residential care. However, papers in this Special Issue reveal that important challenges remain in developing, resourcing and implementing effective family partnering in the field. True RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT FOR CHILDREN & YOUTH 2020, VOL. 37, NO. 4, 265–268 https://doi.org/10.1080/0886571X.2020.1805393
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
编辑
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
33.30%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Trauma–Sensitive Residential Care: Perspectives of Portuguese Professionals to Spark Change Guest Editors’ Note Mapping the Journey to Success: Key Characteristics of Male Youths Benefiting the Most from Therapeutic Residential Care After One Year of Intervention Knowledge of Autism and Attitudes Toward Autistic Children: Evaluation of Child Protection Service Staff in Türkiye From Distancing to Connecting: Residential Care Engagement with External Stakeholders Amidst COVID-19. An Italian Investigation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1