The Real Learning Loss: A Lost Opportunity to Reimagine Schooling

IF 1.3 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educational Studies-AESA Pub Date : 2023-02-02 DOI:10.1080/00131946.2023.2169695
Kirsten Robbins, Kristin Cipollone
{"title":"The Real Learning Loss: A Lost Opportunity to Reimagine Schooling","authors":"Kirsten Robbins, Kristin Cipollone","doi":"10.1080/00131946.2023.2169695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Reflections on pandemic schooling and its aftermath have been dominated by narratives of loss. Most notably, there has been sustained attention given to students’ loss of learning and loss of social skills (with implications that this will lead to loss of revenue and a lost generation down the road). This neoliberal view of schooling, which is steeped in whiteness, has led to a narrow understanding of both these problems and their solutions. The solutions that are suggested, informed by whiteness and dominant culture, have significant consequences for all children, but especially BIPOC children. Specifically, there have been calls to focus classroom efforts on raising test scores and calls to add the teaching of social emotional learning skills. In this paper, we critique these moves and argue instead for a more expansive view of possibilities for schooling post-pandemic. Rather than framing this loss as a reason to focus on test scores and scripted curricula, we encourage educators to consider what children have gained and how we might reimagine more democratic, just, and liberatory schooling as a result. We highlight two pedagogical frameworks—community engaged teaching and restorative justice—as viable alternatives to a focus on academic learning loss and SEL.","PeriodicalId":46285,"journal":{"name":"Educational Studies-AESA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Studies-AESA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2023.2169695","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Reflections on pandemic schooling and its aftermath have been dominated by narratives of loss. Most notably, there has been sustained attention given to students’ loss of learning and loss of social skills (with implications that this will lead to loss of revenue and a lost generation down the road). This neoliberal view of schooling, which is steeped in whiteness, has led to a narrow understanding of both these problems and their solutions. The solutions that are suggested, informed by whiteness and dominant culture, have significant consequences for all children, but especially BIPOC children. Specifically, there have been calls to focus classroom efforts on raising test scores and calls to add the teaching of social emotional learning skills. In this paper, we critique these moves and argue instead for a more expansive view of possibilities for schooling post-pandemic. Rather than framing this loss as a reason to focus on test scores and scripted curricula, we encourage educators to consider what children have gained and how we might reimagine more democratic, just, and liberatory schooling as a result. We highlight two pedagogical frameworks—community engaged teaching and restorative justice—as viable alternatives to a focus on academic learning loss and SEL.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
真正的学习损失:失去了重新构想学校教育的机会
对疫情学校教育及其后果的反思一直被关于损失的叙述所主导。最值得注意的是,人们一直关注学生的学习损失和社交技能损失(这将导致收入损失和未来一代人的损失)。这种充满白人色彩的新自由主义教育观导致了对这些问题及其解决方案的狭隘理解。在白人和主流文化的指导下,所提出的解决方案对所有儿童都有重大影响,尤其是BIPOC儿童。具体而言,有人呼吁将课堂教学的重点放在提高考试成绩上,也有人呼吁增加社交情感学习技能的教学。在这篇论文中,我们批评了这些举措,并主张对疫情后上学的可能性有更广泛的看法。我们鼓励教育工作者考虑孩子们获得了什么,以及我们如何因此重新构想更民主、公正和解放的学校教育,而不是将这种损失视为关注考试成绩和照本宣科课程的理由。我们强调了两个教学框架——社区参与教学和恢复性司法——作为关注学术学习损失和SEL的可行替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Studies-AESA
Educational Studies-AESA EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
Teaching innovation factors: analysis from three Iberoamerican countries The impact of sibling size on children’s academic performance; a case study of female high school students in Tehran Social entrepreneurship and career adaptability: the mediating effect of pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy “We Need to Talk about This More”: Students on Just War and How to End War “Close and desirable for whom?”: parents traversing racialised spaces and places in gentrifying U.S. schools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1