Review of Couples on the Couch

IF 0.5 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Contemporary Psychoanalysis Pub Date : 2021-09-02 DOI:10.1080/00107530.2020.1741270
Elena Skolnick
{"title":"Review of Couples on the Couch","authors":"Elena Skolnick","doi":"10.1080/00107530.2020.1741270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The challenge of working with couples from an analytic perspective is bridging the gap between the intrapsychic and the interpersonal. I first began my training in Family and Couples therapies in the 1980s. At that time, there were psychodynamic, psychoanalytic theories to understand individuals, and then there were various systems theories to explain how humans behaved in families or couples—and never the twain shall meet. So, it was a challenge to transcend the limitations of psychoanalytic theories (specifically using a one-person psychology) to understand how individuals behave in couples. This is because, across the ocean in Great Britain, the home of object relations theories, this divide between individual and couples work never occurred. Utilizing the defense of projective identification as a form of interpersonal communication, British theorists were able to transcend this schism. Further, in using projective identification and other object relation concepts, they were able to link unconscious conflicts to individual’s behavior in their most intimate relationships. In the United States, it was not until the emergence of two-person psychologies, that it became possible to bridge the gap between the intrapsychic and interpersonal. There was finally a theoretical foundation with which to conceptualize how individuals in relationships mutually influence each other. So though it may have taken time for this side of the Atlantic to catch up, there has since been a convergence of understanding and some overlapping assumptions about how individuals behave in their intimate partnerships. Couples of the Couch is a collection of essays addressing various challenges and phenomena inherent in working with couples. The","PeriodicalId":46058,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Psychoanalysis","volume":"57 1","pages":"630 - 636"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Psychoanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00107530.2020.1741270","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The challenge of working with couples from an analytic perspective is bridging the gap between the intrapsychic and the interpersonal. I first began my training in Family and Couples therapies in the 1980s. At that time, there were psychodynamic, psychoanalytic theories to understand individuals, and then there were various systems theories to explain how humans behaved in families or couples—and never the twain shall meet. So, it was a challenge to transcend the limitations of psychoanalytic theories (specifically using a one-person psychology) to understand how individuals behave in couples. This is because, across the ocean in Great Britain, the home of object relations theories, this divide between individual and couples work never occurred. Utilizing the defense of projective identification as a form of interpersonal communication, British theorists were able to transcend this schism. Further, in using projective identification and other object relation concepts, they were able to link unconscious conflicts to individual’s behavior in their most intimate relationships. In the United States, it was not until the emergence of two-person psychologies, that it became possible to bridge the gap between the intrapsychic and interpersonal. There was finally a theoretical foundation with which to conceptualize how individuals in relationships mutually influence each other. So though it may have taken time for this side of the Atlantic to catch up, there has since been a convergence of understanding and some overlapping assumptions about how individuals behave in their intimate partnerships. Couples of the Couch is a collection of essays addressing various challenges and phenomena inherent in working with couples. The
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
回顾《沙发上的情侣
从分析的角度与夫妻合作的挑战是弥合心灵和人际关系之间的差距。我第一次接受家庭和夫妻治疗方面的培训是在20世纪80年代。当时,有心理动力学和精神分析理论来理解个体,然后有各种各样的系统理论来解释人类在家庭或夫妻中的行为——两者永远不会重合。因此,超越精神分析理论的局限性(特别是使用一人心理学)来理解个体在夫妻中的行为是一个挑战。这是因为,在大洋彼岸的英国,客体关系理论的发源地,个人工作和夫妻工作之间的这种差异从未发生过。利用对投射认同作为一种人际交往形式的辩护,英国理论家能够超越这种分裂。此外,在使用投射识别和其他对象关系概念时,他们能够将无意识冲突与个人在最亲密关系中的行为联系起来。在美国,直到两个人心理学的出现,人们才有可能弥合心灵和人际之间的鸿沟。终于有了一个理论基础来概念化人际关系中的个体是如何相互影响的。因此,尽管大西洋的这一边可能需要一段时间才能赶上,但从那以后,人们对个人在亲密关系中的行为方式的理解和一些重叠的假设已经趋同。《沙发上的夫妇》是一本论文集,讲述了与夫妇一起工作时所固有的各种挑战和现象。的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
What Happens When We Talk to Each Other: Psychoanalytic Perspectives on Race and Other Difficult Conversations A Fresh Beginning to an Old Conversation: Thoughts on Leon Hoffman’s “We Don’t Trust YOU: Reflections on Anti-Racism in Psychoanalysis” Looking for Love in All the Wrong Places: Hatred as a Conflict Between Dependency and the Pseudo-Autonomous Self Surviving Hating and Being Hated On “Othering”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1