Age-Dependent Hemoglobin A1c Therapeutic Targets Reduce Diabetic Medication Changes in the Elderly.

Thomas A McCormick, John L Adams, Eric A Lee, Nicholas P Emptage, Darryl E Palmer-Toy, John P Martin, Benjamin I Broder, Michael H Kanter, Anna C Davis, Elizabeth A McGlynn
{"title":"Age-Dependent Hemoglobin A1c Therapeutic Targets Reduce Diabetic Medication Changes in the Elderly.","authors":"Thomas A McCormick, John L Adams, Eric A Lee, Nicholas P Emptage, Darryl E Palmer-Toy, John P Martin, Benjamin I Broder, Michael H Kanter, Anna C Davis, Elizabeth A McGlynn","doi":"10.5334/egems.303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether implementation of age-dependent therapeutic targets for high hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) changed clinicians' ordering of diabetes medications for older adults.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2016, Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC) changed the therapeutic targets for alerting clinicians about high HbA1c results in the electronic health record, KP HealthConnect (KPHC). Previously, all HbA1c results ≥7.0 percent were flagged as high in adult patients with diabetes. Starting in 2016, HbA1c therapeutic targets were relaxed to <7.5 percent for patients age 65 to 75, and to <8.0 percent for patients over age 75 to reduce treatment intensity and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis used logistic regression models to calculate the change in odds of a medication change following an HbA1c result after age-dependent HbA1c flags were introduced.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The odds of medication change decreased among patients whose HbA1c targets were relaxed: Odds Ratio (OR) 0.72 (95 percent CI 0.67-0.76) for patients age 65-75 and HbA1c 7.0 percent-7.5 percent; OR 0.72 (95 percent CI 0.65-0.80) for patients over age 75 and HbA1c 7.0 percent-7.5 percent; and OR 0.67 (95 percent CI 0.61-0.75) for patients over age 75 and HbA1c 7.5 percent-8.0 percent. In the age and HbA1c ranges for which the alerts did not change, the odds of medication change generally increased or stayed the same. There was little evidence of medication de-intensification in any group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that the change in therapeutic targets was associated with a reduction in medication intensification among older adults with diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":72880,"journal":{"name":"EGEMS (Washington, DC)","volume":" ","pages":"46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6715934/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EGEMS (Washington, DC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/egems.303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess whether implementation of age-dependent therapeutic targets for high hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) changed clinicians' ordering of diabetes medications for older adults.

Background: In 2016, Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC) changed the therapeutic targets for alerting clinicians about high HbA1c results in the electronic health record, KP HealthConnect (KPHC). Previously, all HbA1c results ≥7.0 percent were flagged as high in adult patients with diabetes. Starting in 2016, HbA1c therapeutic targets were relaxed to <7.5 percent for patients age 65 to 75, and to <8.0 percent for patients over age 75 to reduce treatment intensity and adverse events.

Methods: This retrospective analysis used logistic regression models to calculate the change in odds of a medication change following an HbA1c result after age-dependent HbA1c flags were introduced.

Results: The odds of medication change decreased among patients whose HbA1c targets were relaxed: Odds Ratio (OR) 0.72 (95 percent CI 0.67-0.76) for patients age 65-75 and HbA1c 7.0 percent-7.5 percent; OR 0.72 (95 percent CI 0.65-0.80) for patients over age 75 and HbA1c 7.0 percent-7.5 percent; and OR 0.67 (95 percent CI 0.61-0.75) for patients over age 75 and HbA1c 7.5 percent-8.0 percent. In the age and HbA1c ranges for which the alerts did not change, the odds of medication change generally increased or stayed the same. There was little evidence of medication de-intensification in any group.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that the change in therapeutic targets was associated with a reduction in medication intensification among older adults with diabetes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
年龄依赖性糖化血红蛋白治疗靶点降低老年人糖尿病药物变化
目的:评估高糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)年龄依赖性治疗靶点的实施是否会改变临床医生对老年人糖尿病药物的处方。背景:2016年,Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC)改变了电子健康记录KP HealthConnect (KPHC)中提醒临床医生高HbA1c结果的治疗目标。以前,成年糖尿病患者的所有HbA1c结果≥7.0%被标记为高。从2016年开始,65 - 75岁患者的HbA1c治疗目标放宽至< 7.5%,75岁以上患者的HbA1c治疗目标放宽至< 8.0%,以降低治疗强度和不良事件。方法:本回顾性分析使用逻辑回归模型计算在引入年龄相关HbA1c标志后HbA1c结果后药物改变的几率变化。结果:在HbA1c目标放宽的患者中,药物改变的几率降低:65-75岁患者的优势比(OR)为0.72 (95% CI 0.67-0.76), HbA1c为7.0% - 7.5%;75岁以上患者的OR为0.72 (95% CI 0.65-0.80), HbA1c为7.0% - 7.5%;75岁以上患者的OR为0.67 (95% CI 0.61-0.75), HbA1c为7.5% - 8.0%。在警报没有改变的年龄和HbA1c范围内,药物改变的几率通常增加或保持不变。几乎没有证据表明在任何一组中都有药物去强化。结论:这些发现表明,在老年糖尿病患者中,治疗靶点的改变与药物强化的减少有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementing a Novel Quality Improvement-Based Approach to Data Quality Monitoring and Enhancement in a Multipurpose Clinical Registry. A Spatial Analysis of Health Disparities Associated with Antibiotic Resistant Infections in Children Living in Atlanta (2002–2010) Predicting the Incidence of Pressure Ulcers in the Intensive Care Unit Using Machine Learning Applying a Commercialization-Readiness Framework to Optimize Value for Achieving Sustainability of an Electronic Health Data Research Network and Its Data Capabilities: The SAFTINet Experience. Innovative Data Science to Transform Health Care: All the Pieces Matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1