The Life and Theology of Alexander Knox: Anglicanism in the Age of Enlightenment and Romanticism by David Mccready (review)

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION Newman Studies Journal Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1353/nsj.2022.0005
Shaun Blanchard
{"title":"The Life and Theology of Alexander Knox: Anglicanism in the Age of Enlightenment and Romanticism by David Mccready (review)","authors":"Shaun Blanchard","doi":"10.1353/nsj.2022.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Alexander Knox (1757–1831), a lay theologian of the Church of Ireland, is known mainly to specialists in Anglican studies.1 David McCready’s new study provides a detailed account of Knox’s manifold theological contributions that will appeal to historians and theologians studying Anglo-Irish Christianity in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. While the subtitle certainly hints at the broader relevance of this little-known figure, it actually references only a part of the rich web of interconnected themes, persons, and issues illuminated by this study. McCready has delivered an incredibly rich and widely relevant monograph that merits engagement not only by those interested in English-speaking theology’s appropriation of Platonism, the Enlightenment, and Romanticism. The book is also a deep dive into the eclectic, unique, and innovative thought of a man who helped construct “Anglican” identity itself, engaged Methodists and Roman Catholics in a sincere proto-ecumenical outlook, and was, in certain intriguing aspects, a forerunner of the Oxford Movement. The first chapter sketches Knox’s life as a lay theologian, and one who demands attention for his connection to John Wesley and his influence on, among others, Hannah More, William Wilberforce, Gladstone, and Newman. McCready’s second chapter is an important analysis of Knox as “a theoretician of Anglicanism” (37–39). In addition to tilling the soil that made the Tractarians possible, the story of the construction of a distinctively “Anglican” identity—Knox was one of the first to popularize the term itself—in the early nineteenth century sheds light not only on dynamics internal to the Church of England/Ireland, but to the broader context of a national church that found itself within a modernizing and expanding empire marked by a plurality of confessions. Knox’s unapologetic Erastianism was tempered by an equally sincere commitment to toleration and friendship","PeriodicalId":41065,"journal":{"name":"Newman Studies Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Newman Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/nsj.2022.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Alexander Knox (1757–1831), a lay theologian of the Church of Ireland, is known mainly to specialists in Anglican studies.1 David McCready’s new study provides a detailed account of Knox’s manifold theological contributions that will appeal to historians and theologians studying Anglo-Irish Christianity in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. While the subtitle certainly hints at the broader relevance of this little-known figure, it actually references only a part of the rich web of interconnected themes, persons, and issues illuminated by this study. McCready has delivered an incredibly rich and widely relevant monograph that merits engagement not only by those interested in English-speaking theology’s appropriation of Platonism, the Enlightenment, and Romanticism. The book is also a deep dive into the eclectic, unique, and innovative thought of a man who helped construct “Anglican” identity itself, engaged Methodists and Roman Catholics in a sincere proto-ecumenical outlook, and was, in certain intriguing aspects, a forerunner of the Oxford Movement. The first chapter sketches Knox’s life as a lay theologian, and one who demands attention for his connection to John Wesley and his influence on, among others, Hannah More, William Wilberforce, Gladstone, and Newman. McCready’s second chapter is an important analysis of Knox as “a theoretician of Anglicanism” (37–39). In addition to tilling the soil that made the Tractarians possible, the story of the construction of a distinctively “Anglican” identity—Knox was one of the first to popularize the term itself—in the early nineteenth century sheds light not only on dynamics internal to the Church of England/Ireland, but to the broader context of a national church that found itself within a modernizing and expanding empire marked by a plurality of confessions. Knox’s unapologetic Erastianism was tempered by an equally sincere commitment to toleration and friendship
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《亚历山大·诺克斯的生活与神学:启蒙与浪漫主义时代的圣公会》,David Mccready著(综述)
亚历山大·诺克斯(1757-1831)是爱尔兰教会的一位非神职神学家,主要为圣公会研究专家所知。1大卫·麦克雷迪的新研究详细介绍了诺克斯在神学方面的多方面贡献,这将吸引十八世纪和十九世纪研究英爱基督教的历史学家和神学家。虽然副标题肯定暗示了这个鲜为人知的人物更广泛的相关性,但它实际上只提到了这项研究所揭示的相互关联的主题、人物和问题的丰富网络的一部分。麦克雷迪出版了一本极其丰富且广泛相关的专著,不仅值得那些对英语神学对柏拉图主义、启蒙运动和浪漫主义的挪用感兴趣的人参与。这本书还深入探讨了一个折衷、独特和创新的思想,他帮助构建了“圣公会”身份本身,让卫理公会教徒和罗马天主教徒参与了真诚的原普世观,在某些有趣的方面,他是牛津运动的先驱。第一章描绘了诺克斯作为一名世俗神学家的生活,他与约翰·卫斯理的联系以及对汉娜·莫尔、威廉·威尔伯福斯、格莱斯顿和纽曼等人的影响,需要人们关注。麦克雷迪的第二章是对诺克斯作为“圣公会理论家”(37-39)的重要分析。除了耕种使特拉塔里亚人成为可能的土壤外,19世纪初构建独特的“圣公会”身份的故事——诺克斯是最早推广这个词的人之一——不仅揭示了英格兰/爱尔兰教会内部的动态,但更广泛的背景是,一个国家教会发现自己处于一个以多种忏悔为标志的现代化和扩张的帝国中。诺克斯对宽容和友谊同样真诚的承诺缓和了他毫无歉意的伊拉斯提主义
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
St. John Henry Newman’s Experience of Mental Suffering My Campaign in Ireland, Part II: My Connection with the Catholic University by John Henry Newman (review) Religious Vitality in Victorian London by W. M. Jacob (review) The Church Needs the Laity: The Wisdom of John Henry Newman by Michael W. Higgins (review) Literature and Catholicism in the 19th and 20th Centuries ed. by David Torevell (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1