Basic income: a 50-state economic impact analysis

IF 1.3 Q3 ECONOMICS Journal of Financial Economic Policy Pub Date : 2022-05-12 DOI:10.1108/jfep-04-2022-0090
G. J. Jolley
{"title":"Basic income: a 50-state economic impact analysis","authors":"G. J. Jolley","doi":"10.1108/jfep-04-2022-0090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to estimate the economic impact of a basic income for each state in the USA.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nBuilding on existing pilot studies of basic income in the USA, this paper presumes a $500 per month basic income for individuals earning less than $25,000 in annual income. Using impact analysis for planning (IMPLAN) input–output modeling software, estimated increase in gross state product and employment are provided on a state-by-state basis.\n\n\nFindings\nA $6,000 annual basic income ($500 per month) to adult persons earning less than $25,000 annually results in an increase in gross state product (e.g. gross “regional” product in IMPLAN terminology) ranging from 0.7% (District of Columbia) to 5.7% (Florida). Likewise, this increase in household spending will create demand for employment across these states, resulting in an increase in employment from 0.9% (District of Columbia) to 5.8% (Florida).\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo date, to the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first state-by-state analysis of the economic impact of a basic income provision to lower-income individuals.\n","PeriodicalId":45556,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Economic Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Economic Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jfep-04-2022-0090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to estimate the economic impact of a basic income for each state in the USA. Design/methodology/approach Building on existing pilot studies of basic income in the USA, this paper presumes a $500 per month basic income for individuals earning less than $25,000 in annual income. Using impact analysis for planning (IMPLAN) input–output modeling software, estimated increase in gross state product and employment are provided on a state-by-state basis. Findings A $6,000 annual basic income ($500 per month) to adult persons earning less than $25,000 annually results in an increase in gross state product (e.g. gross “regional” product in IMPLAN terminology) ranging from 0.7% (District of Columbia) to 5.7% (Florida). Likewise, this increase in household spending will create demand for employment across these states, resulting in an increase in employment from 0.9% (District of Columbia) to 5.8% (Florida). Originality/value To date, to the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first state-by-state analysis of the economic impact of a basic income provision to lower-income individuals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基本收入:50个州的经济影响分析
目的本文旨在估计基本收入对美国各州的经济影响。设计/方法/方法在美国现有基本收入试点研究的基础上,本文假设年收入低于25000美元的个人每月基本收入为500美元。使用规划影响分析(IMPLAN)输入-输出建模软件,各州提供了州生产总值和就业的估计增长。发现年收入低于25000美元的成年人的年基本收入为6000美元(每月500美元),导致州生产总值(例如IMPLAN术语中的“地区”生产总值)增长0.7%(哥伦比亚特区)至5.7%(佛罗里达州)。同样,家庭支出的增加将在这些州创造就业需求,从而使就业率从0.9%(哥伦比亚特区)增加到5.8%(佛罗里达州)。独创性/价值据作者所知,迄今为止,这是第一次对低收入个人的基本收入规定的经济影响进行逐州分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The Journal of Financial Economic Policy publishes high quality peer reviewed research on financial economic policy issues. The journal is devoted to the advancement of the understanding of the entire spectrum of financial policy and control issues and their interactions to economic phenomena. Economic and financial phenomena involve complex trade-offs and linkages between various types of risk factors and variables of interest to policy makers and market participants alike. Market participants such as economic policy makers, regulators, banking and competition supervisors, corporations and financial institutions, require timely and robust answers to the contemporary and emerging policy questions. In turn, such answers require thorough input by the academics, policy makers and practitioners alike. The Journal of Financial Economic Policy provides the forum to satisfy this need. The journal publishes and invites concise papers to enable a prompt response to current and emerging policy affairs.
期刊最新文献
The impact of formal and informal credit institutions on entrepreneurship Financial inclusion and household consumption behaviour in Ghana The absorptive capacity of the institution in the link between remittances and financial development in Africa: an advance panel regression Why do Indian exporting firms borrow in foreign currency? Volatility dynamics in energy and agriculture markets: An analysis of domestic and global uncertainty factors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1