Intercropped maize-soybean silage: Effects on forage yield, fermentation pattern and nutritional composition

IF 1.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Grassland Science Pub Date : 2021-10-17 DOI:10.1111/grs.12323
Dheyme Cristina Bolson, Fernando Alberto Jacovaci, Viviane Carnaval Gritti, Antônio Vinícius Iank Bueno, João Luiz Pratti Daniel, Luiz Gustavo Nussio, Clóves Cabreira Jobim
{"title":"Intercropped maize-soybean silage: Effects on forage yield, fermentation pattern and nutritional composition","authors":"Dheyme Cristina Bolson,&nbsp;Fernando Alberto Jacovaci,&nbsp;Viviane Carnaval Gritti,&nbsp;Antônio Vinícius Iank Bueno,&nbsp;João Luiz Pratti Daniel,&nbsp;Luiz Gustavo Nussio,&nbsp;Clóves Cabreira Jobim","doi":"10.1111/grs.12323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We investigated whether the intercropping of maize and soybean could improve the silage nutritional content without reducing the forage yield or worsening silage fermentation process and aerobic stability. Three crop arrangements were studied: maize monoculture, soybean monoculture and maize-soybean intercropping. The experimental design was completely randomized with 5 replicates per treatment. Maize-soybean intercropping decreased the dry matter (DM) and grain yield as well as the production of digestible dry matter per hectare. The crude protein content of maize-soybean intercropped silage was higher compared with maize in monoculture (by 40%), but, on average, both silages presented similar fermentation profile, in vitro digestibility (600 g/kg DM), dry matter loss (37.1 g/kg DM), gas loss (36 g/kg DM) and aerobic stability (60 hr). Soybean-crop silage presented an elevated content of volatile organic compounds, low lactic acid concentration (2 g/kg DM), high pH (5.26), and greater losses of dry matter (73 g/kg DM) and gas (98.5 g/kg DM) during fermentation. Aerobic stability was higher in soybean-crop silage (192 hr) due to the high content of volatile fatty acids (butyric acid &gt; 87 g/kg DM) and low contents of residual sugar and lactic acid. In conclusion, maize and soybean intercropping increased crude protein content, but contrary to our hypothesis, the crop association did not result in greater silage digestibility or higher aerobic stability, nonetheless reduced both crop productivity. Additionally, ensiling direct-cut soybean crop with low DM content is not recommended due to the high risk of undesirable fermentation and nutrient losses.</p>","PeriodicalId":56078,"journal":{"name":"Grassland Science","volume":"68 1","pages":"3-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grassland Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/grs.12323","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

We investigated whether the intercropping of maize and soybean could improve the silage nutritional content without reducing the forage yield or worsening silage fermentation process and aerobic stability. Three crop arrangements were studied: maize monoculture, soybean monoculture and maize-soybean intercropping. The experimental design was completely randomized with 5 replicates per treatment. Maize-soybean intercropping decreased the dry matter (DM) and grain yield as well as the production of digestible dry matter per hectare. The crude protein content of maize-soybean intercropped silage was higher compared with maize in monoculture (by 40%), but, on average, both silages presented similar fermentation profile, in vitro digestibility (600 g/kg DM), dry matter loss (37.1 g/kg DM), gas loss (36 g/kg DM) and aerobic stability (60 hr). Soybean-crop silage presented an elevated content of volatile organic compounds, low lactic acid concentration (2 g/kg DM), high pH (5.26), and greater losses of dry matter (73 g/kg DM) and gas (98.5 g/kg DM) during fermentation. Aerobic stability was higher in soybean-crop silage (192 hr) due to the high content of volatile fatty acids (butyric acid > 87 g/kg DM) and low contents of residual sugar and lactic acid. In conclusion, maize and soybean intercropping increased crude protein content, but contrary to our hypothesis, the crop association did not result in greater silage digestibility or higher aerobic stability, nonetheless reduced both crop productivity. Additionally, ensiling direct-cut soybean crop with low DM content is not recommended due to the high risk of undesirable fermentation and nutrient losses.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
间作玉米-大豆青贮:对饲料产量、发酵方式和营养成分的影响
研究了玉米与大豆间作是否能在不降低饲料产量、不影响青贮发酵过程和有氧稳定性的情况下提高青贮营养成分。研究了玉米单作、大豆单作和玉米-大豆间作三种作物安排。试验设计完全随机化,每个处理5个重复。玉米-大豆间作降低了玉米干物质、籽粒产量和每公顷可消化干物质产量。玉米-大豆间作青贮的粗蛋白质含量比单作玉米高40%,但平均而言,两种青贮在体外消化率(600 g/kg DM)、干物质损失(37.1 g/kg DM)、气体损失(36 g/kg DM)和有氧稳定性(60 h)方面具有相似的发酵特征。大豆青贮在发酵过程中挥发性有机物含量升高,乳酸浓度低(2 g/kg DM), pH值高(5.26),干物质损失(73 g/kg DM)和气体损失(98.5 g/kg DM)较大。大豆青贮(192小时)中挥发性脂肪酸(丁酸;87 g/kg DM),残糖和乳酸含量低。综上所述,玉米和大豆间作增加了粗蛋白质含量,但与我们的假设相反,作物关联并没有导致更高的青贮消化率或更高的有氧稳定性,反而降低了两种作物的产量。此外,低干物质含量的直切大豆作物不建议青贮,因为青贮有不良发酵和营养损失的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Grassland Science
Grassland Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Grassland Science is the official English language journal of the Japanese Society of Grassland Science. It publishes original research papers, review articles and short reports in all aspects of grassland science, with an aim of presenting and sharing knowledge, ideas and philosophies on better management and use of grasslands, forage crops and turf plants for both agricultural and non-agricultural purposes across the world. Contributions from anyone, non-members as well as members, are welcome in any of the following fields: grassland environment, landscape, ecology and systems analysis; pasture and lawn establishment, management and cultivation; grassland utilization, animal management, behavior, nutrition and production; forage conservation, processing, storage, utilization and nutritive value; physiology, morphology, pathology and entomology of plants; breeding and genetics; physicochemical property of soil, soil animals and microorganisms and plant nutrition; economics in grassland systems.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Cattle dung detection in pastures from drone images using YOLOv5 Potassium fertilization and defoliation intensity effects on forage characteristics of “BRS Zuri” guineagrass Phylogenomic identification and overexpression of plant size–related genes in Setaria viridis and rice Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1