CFO to CEO: Inspiration or Lunacy?

IF 0.6 Q3 Business, Management and Accounting Psychologist-Manager Journal Pub Date : 2018-08-01 DOI:10.1037/mgr0000073
Ralph A. Mortensen, A. Mead
{"title":"CFO to CEO: Inspiration or Lunacy?","authors":"Ralph A. Mortensen, A. Mead","doi":"10.1037/mgr0000073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many more publications have addressed aspects of the chief executive officer (CEO) role than the chief financial officer (CFO) role. Little research has addressed their relative personality profiles or the purported suitability of CFOs for promotion to the post of CEO. The 16PF Fifth Edition Questionnaire profiles of 2 large CEO (N = 1,670) and CFO (N = 951) samples were compared with national norms and with each other. On average, both samples were more intellectually gifted and emotionally stable than the general population. Compared with CFOs, CEOs were more globally extraverted and independent as well as more abstract thinkers and exhibited greater openness to change. In contrast, the CFOs were more oriented to logic and rules in thinking and decision-making and less patient with others. Implications for CFO success as CEOs were explored as were possible developmental strategies that CEOs could use with the assistance of coaches and psychologist managers.","PeriodicalId":44734,"journal":{"name":"Psychologist-Manager Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychologist-Manager Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/mgr0000073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many more publications have addressed aspects of the chief executive officer (CEO) role than the chief financial officer (CFO) role. Little research has addressed their relative personality profiles or the purported suitability of CFOs for promotion to the post of CEO. The 16PF Fifth Edition Questionnaire profiles of 2 large CEO (N = 1,670) and CFO (N = 951) samples were compared with national norms and with each other. On average, both samples were more intellectually gifted and emotionally stable than the general population. Compared with CFOs, CEOs were more globally extraverted and independent as well as more abstract thinkers and exhibited greater openness to change. In contrast, the CFOs were more oriented to logic and rules in thinking and decision-making and less patient with others. Implications for CFO success as CEOs were explored as were possible developmental strategies that CEOs could use with the assistance of coaches and psychologist managers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CFO对CEO:灵感还是疯狂?
更多的出版物讨论的是首席执行官(CEO)角色的各个方面,而不是首席财务官(CFO)角色。很少有研究涉及他们的相对性格特征,或cfo是否适合晋升为首席执行官。对2个大型CEO (N = 1670)和CFO (N = 951)样本的16PF第五版问卷进行全国规范比较和相互比较。平均而言,这两个样本都比一般人更有智力天赋,情绪也更稳定。与首席财务官相比,首席执行官更外向、更独立,思维更抽象,对变化的态度也更开放。相比之下,首席财务官在思考和决策时更倾向于逻辑和规则,对他人缺乏耐心。在教练和心理学家经理的帮助下,研究了首席财务官作为首席执行官成功的影响,以及首席执行官可能使用的发展战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychologist-Manager Journal
Psychologist-Manager Journal PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Leaders that don’t care: Investigating leader caregiving from an attachment-theoretical perspective. Value–task concordance as a predictor of job satisfaction and workplace engagement. Becoming an organizational leader: A different career path for psychologists. The road to gender equality: Persisting obstacles for American women in the workforce. The practice of management: The ascent of women as scholars and leaders in the field of zoo biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1