SELF-COMPASSION AND SELF-PROTECTION IN TWO-CHAIR TECHNIQUE: CONSENSUAL QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF TRANSCRIBED VIDEO-RECORDINGS

Q4 Psychology Psychological Thought Pub Date : 2021-10-30 DOI:10.37708/psyct.v14i2.573
Viktória Vráblová, J. Halamová, Bronislava Strnádelová, Slávka Zlúkyová, Alžbeta Dvoranová
{"title":"SELF-COMPASSION AND SELF-PROTECTION IN TWO-CHAIR TECHNIQUE: CONSENSUAL QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF TRANSCRIBED VIDEO-RECORDINGS","authors":"Viktória Vráblová, J. Halamová, Bronislava Strnádelová, Slávka Zlúkyová, Alžbeta Dvoranová","doi":"10.37708/psyct.v14i2.573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Even though self-compassion and self-protection are associated with well-being and mental and physical health, qualitative research in this area is very rare. As no study has compared self-compassionate and self-protective responses during the two-chair technique, the aim was to analyze participants’ subjective responses in reacting to self-criticism during the technique and compare self-compassionate and self-protective statements. The research sample comprised 80 participants; 60 women and 20 men (M = 23.86; SD = 5.98). The investigation underwent consensual qualitative analysis. The results showed four main domains for self-compassion and self-protection: cognitive, behavioral, emotional, and interpersonal aspects. In several cases, the participants utilized self-compassion and self-protection simultaneously or subsequently, and both types of responses to some degree supplemented each other or were intertwined. Self-protection and self-compassion are complimentary. Only by combining these two constructs can individuals assertively protect themselves while being kind to themselves and others. In the case of self-compassion, the results confirm several findings from previous studies, but in the case of self-protection, this is the first more detailed exploration of this construct because it has not been studied sufficiently to date. ","PeriodicalId":37380,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Thought","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Thought","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37708/psyct.v14i2.573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Even though self-compassion and self-protection are associated with well-being and mental and physical health, qualitative research in this area is very rare. As no study has compared self-compassionate and self-protective responses during the two-chair technique, the aim was to analyze participants’ subjective responses in reacting to self-criticism during the technique and compare self-compassionate and self-protective statements. The research sample comprised 80 participants; 60 women and 20 men (M = 23.86; SD = 5.98). The investigation underwent consensual qualitative analysis. The results showed four main domains for self-compassion and self-protection: cognitive, behavioral, emotional, and interpersonal aspects. In several cases, the participants utilized self-compassion and self-protection simultaneously or subsequently, and both types of responses to some degree supplemented each other or were intertwined. Self-protection and self-compassion are complimentary. Only by combining these two constructs can individuals assertively protect themselves while being kind to themselves and others. In the case of self-compassion, the results confirm several findings from previous studies, but in the case of self-protection, this is the first more detailed exploration of this construct because it has not been studied sufficiently to date. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两椅技术中的自我同情和自我保护:转录录像的共识定性分析
尽管自我同情和自我保护与幸福和身心健康有关,但这一领域的定性研究非常罕见。由于没有研究比较过在两张椅子技巧中自我同情和自我保护的反应,所以目的是分析参与者在技巧过程中对自我批评的主观反应,并比较自我同情和自我保护的陈述。研究样本包括80名参与者;女性60名,男性20名(M = 23.86;Sd = 5.98)。调查进行了一致同意的定性分析。结果显示,自我同情和自我保护的四个主要领域:认知、行为、情感和人际方面。在一些情况下,参与者同时或随后使用自我同情和自我保护,这两种类型的反应在一定程度上相互补充或交织在一起。自我保护和自我同情是互补的。只有将这两个构念结合起来,个体才能自信地保护自己,同时善待自己和他人。就自我同情而言,研究结果证实了之前的一些研究结果,但就自我保护而言,这是第一次对这一概念进行更详细的探索,因为迄今为止还没有对其进行充分的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Thought
Psychological Thought Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal "Psychological Thought" publishes its papers in English or in Bulgarian in all areas of psychology. It is focused on the psychological theory and practice. The papers could be some original research articles, meta-analysis data, clinical reports, case studies, students'' essays, and book reviews. This journal is designed for psychologists, researchers, and psychology students.
期刊最新文献
POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY: GENESIS, STATUS, AND PROSPECTS. INTERVIEW WITH PROF. RUMEN STAMATOV, PH.D., D.SC. VALIDATION STUDY OF THE SPANISH VERSION OF THE PANDEMIC (COVID-19) ANXIETY TRAVEL SCALE IN PERU A SINGLE CASE STUDY IMPLEMENTING A 12-SESSION REHABILITATION JOURNEY: LESSONS LEARNED FROM 'CURTAIN DOWN' TO 'CURTAIN UP' REVIEW OF THE BOOK "PSYCHOANALYSIS IN BULGARIA UNTIL THE 40S OF THE 20TH CENTURY", WRITTEN BY ASSOC. PROF. STOIL MAVRODIEV, D.SC. TEST OF INVARIANCE OF THE ANOMIE BRIEF SCALE WITH THE ALIGNMENT METHOD IN 12 LATIN AMERICAN COUNTRIES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1