Interhemispheric asymmetries of neutral upwelling and ion upflow

IF 2.6 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences Pub Date : 2023-08-15 DOI:10.3389/fspas.2023.1151016
M. Lessard, Alec Damsell, F. B. Sadler, K. Oksavik, L. Clausen
{"title":"Interhemispheric asymmetries of neutral upwelling and ion upflow","authors":"M. Lessard, Alec Damsell, F. B. Sadler, K. Oksavik, L. Clausen","doi":"10.3389/fspas.2023.1151016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work addresses interhemispheric differences in cusp-related neutral density enhancements. The focus is on enhancements that are driven by Poleward Moving Auroral Forms (PMAF), which provide a repetitive sequence of soft electron precipitation to the ionosphere. Because the time-scales of the resultant electron heating, ion upflow and neutral upwelling range from a few seconds to tens of minutes, i.e., longer than the time required for the thermosphere to return to its relaxed state, each subsequent PMAF encounters different initial conditions. With this in mind, our study investigates the role of a dark versus daylight ionosphere, using 3 different scenarios. The first case compares this effect during solar minimum at Longyearbyen, Svalbard, an ideal location for observing cusp dynamics. The second case addresses solar maximum at Longyearbyen and the third case compares Longyearbyen to its magnetically conjugate Zhongshan Station in Antarctica. We conclude 1) for each of the 3 scenarios ion upflow speeds, neutral upwelling speeds and neutral density enhancements are all significantly greater in a dark ionosphere, by perhaps as much as a factor or 2 or 3, relative to a sunlit ionosphere, 2) that upflowing ions are the driver of neutral upwelling via ion-neutral collisions (momentum transfer), with fast-moving ions transferring upward momentum to slow-moving neutrals, and 3) the ratios of neutral upflow speeds to ion upflow speeds, vnSunlit/viSunlit is the order of 0.07 for all stations (at 800 km) in the first and second cases studied, but only 0.02 at Zhongshan in the 3rd case studied, a factor of ∼3 less than the other locations. This is thought to be due to an increased thermospheric density at Zhongshan, which essentially provides a greater total mass for the upflowing ions to lift.","PeriodicalId":46793,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2023.1151016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This work addresses interhemispheric differences in cusp-related neutral density enhancements. The focus is on enhancements that are driven by Poleward Moving Auroral Forms (PMAF), which provide a repetitive sequence of soft electron precipitation to the ionosphere. Because the time-scales of the resultant electron heating, ion upflow and neutral upwelling range from a few seconds to tens of minutes, i.e., longer than the time required for the thermosphere to return to its relaxed state, each subsequent PMAF encounters different initial conditions. With this in mind, our study investigates the role of a dark versus daylight ionosphere, using 3 different scenarios. The first case compares this effect during solar minimum at Longyearbyen, Svalbard, an ideal location for observing cusp dynamics. The second case addresses solar maximum at Longyearbyen and the third case compares Longyearbyen to its magnetically conjugate Zhongshan Station in Antarctica. We conclude 1) for each of the 3 scenarios ion upflow speeds, neutral upwelling speeds and neutral density enhancements are all significantly greater in a dark ionosphere, by perhaps as much as a factor or 2 or 3, relative to a sunlit ionosphere, 2) that upflowing ions are the driver of neutral upwelling via ion-neutral collisions (momentum transfer), with fast-moving ions transferring upward momentum to slow-moving neutrals, and 3) the ratios of neutral upflow speeds to ion upflow speeds, vnSunlit/viSunlit is the order of 0.07 for all stations (at 800 km) in the first and second cases studied, but only 0.02 at Zhongshan in the 3rd case studied, a factor of ∼3 less than the other locations. This is thought to be due to an increased thermospheric density at Zhongshan, which essentially provides a greater total mass for the upflowing ions to lift.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中性上升流和离子上升流的半球间不对称性
这项工作解决了与尖点相关的中性密度增强的半球间差异。重点是由极地移动极光形式(PMAF)驱动的增强,它为电离层提供了一个重复的软电子沉淀序列。由于所产生的电子加热、离子上升流和中性上升流的时间尺度从几秒到几十分钟不等,即比热层恢复到其松弛状态所需的时间更长,因此每个后续的PMAF都会遇到不同的初始条件。考虑到这一点,我们的研究使用3种不同的场景调查了黑暗电离层与白天电离层的作用。第一种情况比较了斯瓦尔巴群岛朗伊尔城太阳活动极小期的这种影响,朗伊尔城是观测尖点动力学的理想地点。第二种情况涉及朗伊尔城的太阳极大期,第三种情况将朗伊尔城与其磁共轭的南极中山站进行了比较。我们得出的结论是:1)对于3种情况中的每一种,离子上行速度、中性上行速度和中性密度增强在黑暗电离层中都明显更大,可能比阳光照射的电离层大一倍或2或3倍;2)上行离子是通过离子-中性碰撞(动量传递)实现中性上行的驱动因素,快速移动的离子将向上的动量转移到缓慢移动的中性点,以及3)中性上行速度与离子上行速度的比率,在研究的第一种和第二种情况下,所有站点(800公里处)的vnSunlit/viSunlit为0.07的数量级,但在研究的第三种情况下中山仅为0.02,比其他位置低约3倍。这被认为是由于中山的热层密度增加,这基本上为向上流动的离子提供了更大的总质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
363
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Application of collisional analysis to the differential velocity of solar wind ions Sun-as-a-star variability of Hα and Ca II 854.2 nm lines Coherence of Elsässer Variables in the slow solar wind from 0.1 au to 0.3 au Forecasting solar flares with a transformer network Ultra-broadband infrared metamaterial absorber based on MDMDM structure for optical sensing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1