Screening role of complete blood cell count indices and C reactive protein in patients who are symptomatic for COVID-19
Bijan Ansari-moghaddam, Seyyed Amir Yasin Ahmadi, M. Matouri, Ali Ghaemmaghami, A. Amiri, Elham Tavakkol, F. Shahsavar
{"title":"Screening role of complete blood cell count indices and C reactive protein in patients who are symptomatic for COVID-19","authors":"Bijan Ansari-moghaddam, Seyyed Amir Yasin Ahmadi, M. Matouri, Ali Ghaemmaghami, A. Amiri, Elham Tavakkol, F. Shahsavar","doi":"10.5603/demj.a2022.0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Diagnosis of COVID-19 is through polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or typical involvement of the lung by the virus in computed tomography (CT) scan. However, PCR is not always available, and also CT scan has a high dose of radiation. This study was performed to find the role of complete blood cell (CBC) indices and qualitative C-reactive protein (CRP) in screening of symptomatic patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A diagnostic accuracy study was performed on symptomatic cases in Abadan. Four stepwise logistic regression models were designed that the outcomes were PCR positivity, CT scan positivity, PCR and CT scan positivity, and COVID-19 positivity (i.e., PCR or CT scan positivity). Post-estimation receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was performed to report the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: A total of 104 patients were studied. The most accurate model was for the prediction of CT scan positivity (AUC = 0.874) in which the predictors were age [odds ratio (OR) =1.063] and CRP (OR = 2.661 for each plus of positivity). The second accurate model was for the prediction of COVID-19 positivity (AUC = 0.828) in which the predictors were white blood cell count (OR = 0.735 for every 1000 counts per μL) and neutrophil per lymphocyte ratio (OR = 1.248). CONCLUSIONS: Higher levels of CRP are associated with and predictor of lung involvement in COVID-19 infection. CRP qualitative levels can be measured before a CT scan if there is no other indication for imaging. © 2022 Via Medica.","PeriodicalId":52339,"journal":{"name":"Disaster and Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disaster and Emergency Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/demj.a2022.0028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
新冠肺炎症状患者全血细胞计数指数和C反应蛋白的筛查作用
简介:新冠肺炎的诊断是通过聚合酶链式反应(PCR)或计算机断层扫描中病毒对肺部的典型侵袭。然而,PCR并不总是可用的,而且CT扫描也有高剂量的辐射。本研究旨在探讨全血细胞(CBC)指数和C反应蛋白(CRP)在症状患者筛查中的作用。材料和方法:对阿巴丹有症状的病例进行诊断准确性研究。设计了四个逐步逻辑回归模型,结果分别为PCR阳性、CT扫描阳性、PCR和CT扫描阳性以及新冠肺炎阳性(即PCR或CT扫描阳性)。进行估计后受试者工作特性(ROC)曲线分析,以报告曲线下面积(AUC)。结果:共对104名患者进行了研究。最准确的模型是预测CT扫描阳性率(AUC=0.874),其中预测因素是年龄[比值比(OR)=1.063]和CRP(阳性率每增加一个,OR=2.661)。第二个准确模型用于预测新冠肺炎阳性(AUC=0.882),其中预测因子为白细胞计数(每1000个计数每μL OR=0.735)和中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比率(OR=1.248)。如果没有其他成像指示,可以在CT扫描前测量CRP定性水平。©2022 Via Medica。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。