Measuring consumers’ perceptions of business ethicality on price, product, and service domains

IF 1.9 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT Cross Cultural & Strategic Management Pub Date : 2019-12-05 DOI:10.1108/ccsm-01-2019-0017
J. Tsalikis, Michelle van Solt, B. Seaton
{"title":"Measuring consumers’ perceptions of business ethicality on price, product, and service domains","authors":"J. Tsalikis, Michelle van Solt, B. Seaton","doi":"10.1108/ccsm-01-2019-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to examine consumer perceptions across various countries, and uses content analysis in order to compare individual countries’ perceptions of ethicality over three business domains: price, product and service.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe data encompasses measurements from 18 countries including the USA and countries in Eastern and Western Europe, Latin America, Asia and the Middle East Hofstede’s cultural dimensions and the gross national income purchasing power parity were explored to explain the differences in focus between countries.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results indicate that Mexico and Argentina place a higher focus on price, while Russia, China and India place a greater focus on the product element. In terms of ethical perceptions of service, only Brazil places high focus on this domain. The results indicated that uncertainty avoidance was significant for five of the six countries focusing on price, suggesting that price provides a level of certainty and therefore less ambiguity.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe importance of this study is based on the idea that consumer trust is vital to the efficient running of economic activity.\n","PeriodicalId":51820,"journal":{"name":"Cross Cultural & Strategic Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/ccsm-01-2019-0017","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cross Cultural & Strategic Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ccsm-01-2019-0017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine consumer perceptions across various countries, and uses content analysis in order to compare individual countries’ perceptions of ethicality over three business domains: price, product and service. Design/methodology/approach The data encompasses measurements from 18 countries including the USA and countries in Eastern and Western Europe, Latin America, Asia and the Middle East Hofstede’s cultural dimensions and the gross national income purchasing power parity were explored to explain the differences in focus between countries. Findings The results indicate that Mexico and Argentina place a higher focus on price, while Russia, China and India place a greater focus on the product element. In terms of ethical perceptions of service, only Brazil places high focus on this domain. The results indicated that uncertainty avoidance was significant for five of the six countries focusing on price, suggesting that price provides a level of certainty and therefore less ambiguity. Originality/value The importance of this study is based on the idea that consumer trust is vital to the efficient running of economic activity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
衡量消费者在价格、产品和服务领域对商业道德的看法
目的本文的目的是考察各国消费者的看法,并使用内容分析来比较各国在价格、产品和服务三个商业领域对道德的看法。设计/方法/方法数据包括来自18个国家的测量数据,包括美国和东欧和西欧、拉丁美洲、亚洲和中东国家。霍夫斯泰德的文化维度和国民总收入购买力平价被探讨,以解释国家之间关注的差异。研究结果表明,墨西哥和阿根廷更关注价格,而俄罗斯、中国和印度更关注产品元素。就服务的道德观念而言,只有巴西高度重视这一领域。结果表明,在关注价格的六个国家中,有五个国家避免了不确定性,这表明价格提供了一定程度的确定性,从而减少了模糊性。独创性/价值本研究的重要性在于消费者信任对经济活动的有效运行至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
12.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Cross Cultural & Strategic Management (CCSM), is dedicated to providing a forum for the publication of high quality cross-cultural and strategic management research in the global context. CCSM is interdisciplinary in nature and welcomes submissions from scholars from international business, management and other disciplines, such as anthropology, economics, political science, psychology and sociology. The goal of CCSM is to publish discerning, theoretically grounded, evidence-based and cutting edge research on issues relevant to all aspects of global management. CCSM is especially interested in theoretical and empirical papers that investigate new and unique ideas and/or are multilevel (micro-meso-macro) and/or are multidisciplinary in nature. Research papers submitted to CCSM are expected to include an answer to the question: What is the contribution of this paper to the literature and the field of international business and managing in the global context? CCSM accepts theoretical/conceptual and empirical papers based on quantitative and qualitative research endeavors that advance our overall knowledge of international business. This includes research that yields positive, neutral or negative findings as long as these studies are based on sound research methodology, and have a good command of the theory/literature that pertains to the phenomena under investigation. These studies should also provide a more in-depth interpretation of the reason(s) for the findings and include more detailed recommendations for future research directions.
期刊最新文献
The roles of entrepreneurial orientation and government support in the open innovation of manufacturing firms: empirical evidence from South Korea “Without trust, we can’t really do any work”: workplace trust and communication among expatriates and host nationals The effect of intellectual property rights on firm performance in service firms: the role of process and organizational innovation When the well is full, it will run over: the double-edged sword effect of corporate lobbying activities on firm performance Consumer emotions and behaviors: double moderation of sign value and source market
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1