p16 and Ki-67 immunohistochemical staining reduces inter- and intra-observer variability in the grading of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions of South African women

IF 0.1 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Southern African Journal of Gynaecological Oncology Pub Date : 2017-09-14 DOI:10.1080/20742835.2017.1370841
C. Solomon, M. Louw, Mc van Aardt, G. Dreyer
{"title":"p16 and Ki-67 immunohistochemical staining reduces inter- and intra-observer variability in the grading of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions of South African women","authors":"C. Solomon, M. Louw, Mc van Aardt, G. Dreyer","doi":"10.1080/20742835.2017.1370841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cervical carcinoma was the second leading malignancy in South African women (following breast carcinoma) in 2010. This study aimed to correlate histopathological criteria and immunohistochemical stains in terms of the grading of cervical intraepithelial precursor lesions and evaluate intra- and inter-observer variability with only histology and with additional immunohistochemical stains. Methods: Archival tissue from large-loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) was graded on two separate occasions by an independent observer in terms of lesional severity. The section with the highest grade precursor lesion was selected and submitted for immunohistochemical stains that included p16 and Ki-67. These stains were also evaluated on two separate occasions by an independent observer. Results: This study showed kappa values of 0.47 and 0.46 respectively for the separate histological evaluations of the observer and the original pathology report. The kappa value for the two evaluations of the observer was 0.57. Thus inter- and intra-observer variability is fair with the use of routinely stained histological slides. The two Ki-67 assessments had a kappa value of 0.85 and the p16 had a value of 0.80. Intra-observer agreement was markedly higher when using immunohistochemistry. Conclusion: Although in most cases of precursor lesions of the cervix the grading can be made on routinely stained sections, intra- and inter-observer variability remains high. Immunohistochemical markers reduce this variability and aid in deciding in which group to place ambiguous lesions.","PeriodicalId":41638,"journal":{"name":"Southern African Journal of Gynaecological Oncology","volume":"9 1","pages":"25 - 29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20742835.2017.1370841","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern African Journal of Gynaecological Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20742835.2017.1370841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Cervical carcinoma was the second leading malignancy in South African women (following breast carcinoma) in 2010. This study aimed to correlate histopathological criteria and immunohistochemical stains in terms of the grading of cervical intraepithelial precursor lesions and evaluate intra- and inter-observer variability with only histology and with additional immunohistochemical stains. Methods: Archival tissue from large-loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) was graded on two separate occasions by an independent observer in terms of lesional severity. The section with the highest grade precursor lesion was selected and submitted for immunohistochemical stains that included p16 and Ki-67. These stains were also evaluated on two separate occasions by an independent observer. Results: This study showed kappa values of 0.47 and 0.46 respectively for the separate histological evaluations of the observer and the original pathology report. The kappa value for the two evaluations of the observer was 0.57. Thus inter- and intra-observer variability is fair with the use of routinely stained histological slides. The two Ki-67 assessments had a kappa value of 0.85 and the p16 had a value of 0.80. Intra-observer agreement was markedly higher when using immunohistochemistry. Conclusion: Although in most cases of precursor lesions of the cervix the grading can be made on routinely stained sections, intra- and inter-observer variability remains high. Immunohistochemical markers reduce this variability and aid in deciding in which group to place ambiguous lesions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
p16和Ki-67免疫组织化学染色降低了南非妇女宫颈鳞状上皮内病变分级的观察者之间和观察者内部的变异性
背景:2010年,宫颈癌是南非女性的第二大恶性肿瘤(仅次于乳腺癌)。本研究旨在根据宫颈上皮内前体病变的分级,将组织病理学标准和免疫组织化学染色联系起来,并评估观察者内和观察者间的变异性,仅使用组织学和额外的免疫组织化学标记。方法:由一名独立观察者在两个不同的场合根据病变的严重程度对转化区大环切除术(LLETZ)的档案组织进行分级。选择具有最高级别前驱病变的切片,并进行免疫组织化学染色,包括p16和Ki-67。一名独立观察员还分别在两个场合对这些污渍进行了评估。结果:本研究显示,观察者的单独组织学评估和原始病理报告的kappa值分别为0.47和0.46。观察者的两次评估的kappa值为0.57。因此,使用常规染色的组织学切片,观察者之间和观察者内部的变异性是公平的。两次Ki-67评估的kappa值为0.85,p16的值为0.80。当使用免疫组织化学时,观察者内部的一致性明显更高。结论:尽管在大多数宫颈前病变病例中,可以在常规染色切片上进行分级,但观察者内部和观察者之间的变异性仍然很高。免疫组织化学标记减少了这种变异性,并有助于决定在哪一组中放置模糊病变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Retrospective review of 37.4 Gy in 11 fractions for the palliation of advanced cervical cancer Challenges managing women with suspected Lynch Syndrome in Zimbabwe: a case report A retrospective study comparing the efficiency of recurrent LSIL cytology to high-grade cytology as predictors of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or worse (CIN2+) A retrospective study of the epidemiology and histological subtypes of ovarian epithelial neoplasms at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital Laparoscopic inguinal lymph node dissection in carcinoma of the vulva: experience and intermediate results at one institution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1