Speaking truth to power: Legal scholars as survivors and witnesses of the Covid-19 maternal mortality in Brazil

IF 1.1 3区 社会学 Q2 LAW Icon-International Journal of Constitutional Law Pub Date : 2022-11-17 DOI:10.1093/icon/moac066
Gabriela Rondon, D. Diniz, Juliano Zaiden Benvindo
{"title":"Speaking truth to power: Legal scholars as survivors and witnesses of the Covid-19 maternal mortality in Brazil","authors":"Gabriela Rondon, D. Diniz, Juliano Zaiden Benvindo","doi":"10.1093/icon/moac066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The Covid-19 health emergency has placed special demands on legal scholars, particularly on those based in the Global South. Brazil has been one of the epicenters of the pandemic, with over 680,000 deaths as of August 2022. Our narrative emerges from the duality of our positions amid a national tragedy—we are at the same time survivors of the collective threat of a would-be autocrat and a Covid-19-denialist government, and witnesses to how our preexisting privileges put us in a position of readiness “to speak truth to power.” Speaking truth to power means not only to exercise an independent spirit of analysis and judgment with respect to power, but also to interpellate power openly about its wrongdoings. We understand that our responsibility as legal scholars is to embrace the urgency of the moment—to expand our research agendas beyond our previous academic trajectories and work to mitigate situations of rights violations. It also means that our work as legal scholars has had to transcend the traditional academic spaces. We have positioned ourselves as advocates and litigators for those most affected by the pandemic, in particular vulnerable women. In this article, we share one of our key initiatives during the pandemic—a constitutional lawsuit to demand the right of pregnant and postpartum people to access Covid-19 vaccines.","PeriodicalId":51599,"journal":{"name":"Icon-International Journal of Constitutional Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Icon-International Journal of Constitutional Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moac066","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Covid-19 health emergency has placed special demands on legal scholars, particularly on those based in the Global South. Brazil has been one of the epicenters of the pandemic, with over 680,000 deaths as of August 2022. Our narrative emerges from the duality of our positions amid a national tragedy—we are at the same time survivors of the collective threat of a would-be autocrat and a Covid-19-denialist government, and witnesses to how our preexisting privileges put us in a position of readiness “to speak truth to power.” Speaking truth to power means not only to exercise an independent spirit of analysis and judgment with respect to power, but also to interpellate power openly about its wrongdoings. We understand that our responsibility as legal scholars is to embrace the urgency of the moment—to expand our research agendas beyond our previous academic trajectories and work to mitigate situations of rights violations. It also means that our work as legal scholars has had to transcend the traditional academic spaces. We have positioned ourselves as advocates and litigators for those most affected by the pandemic, in particular vulnerable women. In this article, we share one of our key initiatives during the pandemic—a constitutional lawsuit to demand the right of pregnant and postpartum people to access Covid-19 vaccines.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
向权力说出真相:法律学者作为巴西Covid-19孕产妇死亡率的幸存者和见证者
新冠肺炎突发卫生事件对法律学者提出了特殊要求,尤其是对全球南方的法律学者。巴西一直是疫情的中心之一,截至2022年8月,死亡人数超过68万。我们的叙述源于我们在国家悲剧中立场的双重性——我们同时也是潜在独裁者和新冠肺炎新一代政府集体威胁的幸存者,并见证了我们原有的特权如何使我们处于“随时准备向权力说真话”的地位。“对权力说真话,不仅意味着对权力行使独立的分析和判断精神,还意味着公开质询权力的不法行为。我们明白,作为法律学者,我们的责任是接受这一时刻的紧迫性——将我们的研究议程扩展到我们以前的学术轨迹之外,并努力缓解侵犯权利的情况。这也意味着我们作为法律学者的工作必须超越传统的学术空间。我们将自己定位为受疫情影响最严重的人,特别是弱势妇女的倡导者和诉讼律师。在这篇文章中,我们分享了我们在大流行病期间的一项关键举措——要求孕妇和产后者获得新冠肺炎疫苗的权利的宪法诉讼。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
67
期刊最新文献
Comparative judicial federalism Control and paralysis? A context-sensitive analysis of objections to supermajorities in constitutional adjudication Constituent power: From Schmitt to Kantorowicz—Afterword to the Foreword by Sergio Verdugo Can the people exercise constituent power? Route 66: Mutations of the internal market explored through the prism of citation networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1