Adrenal Vein Sampling: Radiation Dose Reduction on New Angiography Platform

A. Alsafi, F. Wernig, J. Todd, T. Tan, F. Palazzo, K. Meeran, J. Jackson
{"title":"Adrenal Vein Sampling: Radiation Dose Reduction on New Angiography Platform","authors":"A. Alsafi, F. Wernig, J. Todd, T. Tan, F. Palazzo, K. Meeran, J. Jackson","doi":"10.4103/AJIR.AJIR_24_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Primary aldosteronism is one of the most common causes of secondary hypertension. Distinguishing unilateral from bilateral disease is essential as those with unilateral adrenal disease will benefit from adrenalectomy. This is best achieved by adrenal vein sampling (AVS) which may be a difficult procedure with significant radiation to both patient and operator. This study aims to measure the radiation dose during AVS before and after the installation of a new angiography platform. Materials and Methods: The dose area product (DAP), air kerma, and fluoroscopy time were collected retrospectively together with demographic data for the first ten patients who underwent AVS between April and September 2018 following the installation of the Philips Azurion 7 M20 interventional platform. These results were compared with those from ten patients who underwent AVS before the installation of the new machine using the Philips Allura Xper FD20 platform. Mann–Whitney test was used to compare DAP, air kerma, and fluoroscopy time. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Successful bilateral adrenal vein catheterization was achieved in all cases in both groups. There was no significant difference in fluoroscopy time: 5.5 (3.3–10.8) min (new) versus 5.3 (4.5–8.4) min (old) (P = 0.9502). The DAP and air kerma were both significantly lower on the new machine: 11.3 (5.2–26.7) Gy.cm2 versus 45.5 (17.2–56.5) Gy.cm2 (P = 0.0089) and 201.5 (88.1–464.0) mGy versus 682.5 (300.5–998.5) mGy (P = 0.0115), respectively. Conclusion: The installation of the Philips Azurion 7 M20 interventional platform has allowed a significant reduction in radiation dose during AVS.","PeriodicalId":32940,"journal":{"name":"The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology","volume":"4 1","pages":"102 - 106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/AJIR.AJIR_24_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: Primary aldosteronism is one of the most common causes of secondary hypertension. Distinguishing unilateral from bilateral disease is essential as those with unilateral adrenal disease will benefit from adrenalectomy. This is best achieved by adrenal vein sampling (AVS) which may be a difficult procedure with significant radiation to both patient and operator. This study aims to measure the radiation dose during AVS before and after the installation of a new angiography platform. Materials and Methods: The dose area product (DAP), air kerma, and fluoroscopy time were collected retrospectively together with demographic data for the first ten patients who underwent AVS between April and September 2018 following the installation of the Philips Azurion 7 M20 interventional platform. These results were compared with those from ten patients who underwent AVS before the installation of the new machine using the Philips Allura Xper FD20 platform. Mann–Whitney test was used to compare DAP, air kerma, and fluoroscopy time. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Successful bilateral adrenal vein catheterization was achieved in all cases in both groups. There was no significant difference in fluoroscopy time: 5.5 (3.3–10.8) min (new) versus 5.3 (4.5–8.4) min (old) (P = 0.9502). The DAP and air kerma were both significantly lower on the new machine: 11.3 (5.2–26.7) Gy.cm2 versus 45.5 (17.2–56.5) Gy.cm2 (P = 0.0089) and 201.5 (88.1–464.0) mGy versus 682.5 (300.5–998.5) mGy (P = 0.0115), respectively. Conclusion: The installation of the Philips Azurion 7 M20 interventional platform has allowed a significant reduction in radiation dose during AVS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肾上腺静脉采样:在新的血管造影平台上降低辐射剂量
目的:原发性醛固酮增多症是继发性高血压最常见的原因之一。区分单侧和双侧疾病是必要的,因为那些单侧肾上腺疾病将受益于肾上腺切除术。这最好通过肾上腺静脉取样(AVS)来实现,这可能是一个困难的过程,对患者和操作者都有很大的辐射。本研究旨在测量安装新血管造影平台前后AVS期间的辐射剂量。材料与方法:回顾性收集2018年4月至9月安装Philips Azurion 7 M20介入平台后接受AVS的前10例患者的剂量面积积(DAP)、空气密度、透视时间以及人口统计学数据。这些结果与10名在安装飞利浦Allura Xper FD20平台之前接受AVS的患者的结果进行了比较。采用Mann-Whitney检验比较DAP、air kerma和透视时间。P < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:两组患者均成功行双侧肾上腺静脉置管。两组患者透视时间分别为5.5 (3.3-10.8)min(新患者)和5.3 (4.5-8.4)min(老患者),差异无统计学意义(P = 0.9502)。在新机上DAP和air kerma均显著降低:11.3 (5.2-26.7)Gy。cm2对比45.5 (17.2-56.5)Gy。cm2 (P = 0.0089)和201.5 (88.1-464.0)mGy对682.5 (300.5-998.5)mGy (P = 0.0115)。结论:安装Philips Azurion 7 M20介入平台可显著降低AVS期间的辐射剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Keynote PAIRS2024: The Diamond Jubilee of Interventional Radiology, Reflection on the Era of Modernizing Medicine: Our Wins, Losses, and Future Opportunities… Complication Rate of Percutaneous Balloon-Retention versus Locking-Loop Gastrostomy and Gastrojejunostomy Tube Insertion: A Comparison from a Canadian Tertiary Care Centre Ischemic Stroke Post-Transradial Chemoembolization Minimizing the Pain of Local Anesthesia Administration in Interventional Radiology with an Anesthetic Portal Technique Prophylactic Antibiotic Use Prior to Port Placement and Its Effect on Insertion-Related Infection Rates: A Five-Year Retrospective Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1