“Let those who have an experience of prison speak”: The Critique & Praxis of the Prisons Information Group (1970-1980)

Q2 Arts and Humanities Foucault Studies Pub Date : 2021-12-12 DOI:10.22439/fs.vi31.6458
B. Harcourt
{"title":"“Let those who have an experience of prison speak”: The Critique & Praxis of the Prisons Information Group (1970-1980)","authors":"B. Harcourt","doi":"10.22439/fs.vi31.6458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the May ’68 revolution reached a boiling point, a remarkable assemblage of philosophers, writers, and incarcerated persons, doctors, nurses, social workers, and sociologists, activists and organizers, and militants in France turned their attention to the problem of the prison. At a time when prisons were mostly hidden from view, practically impenetrable in France to outsiders, at a time long before we recognized mass incarceration in countries like the United States, the Prisons Information Group (the Groupe d’information sur les prisons or the “GIP”) coalesced to spotlight the travesty of justice that is the prison—one that continues unabated today or, even worse, is exacerbated in Western liberal democracies. As I write these words, people are being violated, slashed, stabbed, and deprived of food and security at the jail on Rikers Island in New York City, with almost a third of the guard staff not even showing up for work.1 As of mid-October 2021, thirteen people imprisoned at Rikers have died this year.2 Our jails and prisons are broken—an intolerable crisis, as the GIP maintained already in 1970.","PeriodicalId":38873,"journal":{"name":"Foucault Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foucault Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.vi31.6458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the May ’68 revolution reached a boiling point, a remarkable assemblage of philosophers, writers, and incarcerated persons, doctors, nurses, social workers, and sociologists, activists and organizers, and militants in France turned their attention to the problem of the prison. At a time when prisons were mostly hidden from view, practically impenetrable in France to outsiders, at a time long before we recognized mass incarceration in countries like the United States, the Prisons Information Group (the Groupe d’information sur les prisons or the “GIP”) coalesced to spotlight the travesty of justice that is the prison—one that continues unabated today or, even worse, is exacerbated in Western liberal democracies. As I write these words, people are being violated, slashed, stabbed, and deprived of food and security at the jail on Rikers Island in New York City, with almost a third of the guard staff not even showing up for work.1 As of mid-October 2021, thirteen people imprisoned at Rikers have died this year.2 Our jails and prisons are broken—an intolerable crisis, as the GIP maintained already in 1970.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“让有监狱经历的人说话”:监狱信息组的批判与实践(1970-1980)
当1968年5月革命达到沸点时,法国的哲学家、作家、被监禁者、医生、护士、社会工作者、社会学家、活动家、组织者和武装分子等一批杰出人士将注意力转向监狱问题。在监狱基本上不为人所知的时候,在法国,外人几乎无法进入监狱,在我们认识到像美国这样的国家存在大规模监禁的很久以前,监狱信息组织(Groupe d’Information sur les prisons,简称“GIP”)联合起来,揭露了监狱对司法的嘲弄——这种嘲弄在今天依然有增无减,在西方自由民主国家甚至更糟。就在我写这些话的时候,人们正在被侵犯,被砍,被刺伤,被剥夺食物和安全,在纽约市赖克斯岛的监狱里,几乎三分之一的警卫人员甚至没有上班截至2021年10月中旬,今年有13名被关押在赖克斯监狱的人死亡我们的拘留所和监狱已经破败不堪——正如1970年GIP所指出的那样,这是一场无法忍受的危机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Foucault Studies
Foucault Studies Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
Inhuman Hermeneutics of the Self: Biopolitics in the Age of Big Data Special Issue Introduction Mark Coeckelbergh, Self-Improvement: Technologies of the Soul in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. New York: Columbia University Press, 2022. Pp. 144. Ungovernable Counter-Conduct: Ivan Illich’s Critique of Governmentality Sustaining Significance of Confessional Form: Taking Foucault to Attitudinal Research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1