What is English? Understanding how subject English is framed in The New Zealand Curriculum

IF 0.1 4区 教育学 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Curriculum Matters Pub Date : 2021-12-21 DOI:10.18296/cm.0052
Felicia Ward
{"title":"What is English? Understanding how subject English is framed in The New Zealand Curriculum","authors":"Felicia Ward","doi":"10.18296/cm.0052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since its emergence as a distinct subject area in the nineteenth century, English has been an important, but contested, subject. Competing discourses, resulting in different models of English, have vied for prominence, each with ideologies about the purposes of education and the needs of students and the state. However, while international research into subject English is plentiful, little has been written about the current state of subject English in New Zealand. Using content analysis and critical discourse analysis this article examines senior subject English in the New Zealand Curriculum. The results reveal that while subject English in New Zealand retains progressive features, it has been colonised by neoliberal educational discourses. This article argues that the results of these discourses include the commodification of learning, the entrenching of inequalities, and the reframing of teachers as mere technicians. While senior subject English in the New Zealand Curriculum is examined here, the results have implications across the curriculum, particularly in light of the NCEA review which began in 2018 and will result in changes from 2024.","PeriodicalId":37874,"journal":{"name":"Curriculum Matters","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curriculum Matters","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18296/cm.0052","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since its emergence as a distinct subject area in the nineteenth century, English has been an important, but contested, subject. Competing discourses, resulting in different models of English, have vied for prominence, each with ideologies about the purposes of education and the needs of students and the state. However, while international research into subject English is plentiful, little has been written about the current state of subject English in New Zealand. Using content analysis and critical discourse analysis this article examines senior subject English in the New Zealand Curriculum. The results reveal that while subject English in New Zealand retains progressive features, it has been colonised by neoliberal educational discourses. This article argues that the results of these discourses include the commodification of learning, the entrenching of inequalities, and the reframing of teachers as mere technicians. While senior subject English in the New Zealand Curriculum is examined here, the results have implications across the curriculum, particularly in light of the NCEA review which began in 2018 and will result in changes from 2024.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
什么是英语?理解新西兰课程中的学科英语框架
自19世纪英语作为一个独特的学科领域出现以来,它一直是一门重要但有争议的学科。相互竞争的话语导致了不同的英语模式,每一种话语都具有关于教育目的、学生和国家需求的意识形态。然而,尽管国际上对主题英语的研究很多,但关于新西兰主题英语的现状却鲜有报道。本文运用内容分析法和批评语篇分析法对新西兰课程中的高年级英语进行了考察。研究结果表明,尽管新西兰的主题英语保留了进步的特征,但它已经被新自由主义的教育话语所殖民化。本文认为,这些话语的结果包括学习的商品化,不平等的加深,以及将教师重新定义为纯粹的技术人员。虽然新西兰课程中的高级科目英语在这里进行了考试,但考试结果对整个课程都有影响,特别是考虑到2018年开始的NCEA审查,从2024年起将发生变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Curriculum Matters
Curriculum Matters Social Sciences-Education
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Published annually, this peer-reviewed journal provides an avenue for discussion, commentary and information about curriculum. The full archive of back issues is available.
期刊最新文献
Editorial An evidence-based approach to secondary school science: Online citizen science and the science capabilities Korean students’ transnational literacy and social networks in a business college Benefits of poetry: An argument for making poetry a required course for EFL literature majors Editorial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1