Racializing Aesthetics

IF 2.1 1区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Current Anthropology Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1086/724725
J. Kahn
{"title":"Racializing Aesthetics","authors":"J. Kahn","doi":"10.1086/724725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the 1960s, thousands of Haitians have boarded wooden sailing vessels in attempts to reach the United States. Commentators have long conflated the perceived characteristics of Haitians making this journey with the material qualities of the vessels they use, creating the racialized archetype of the “boat person” in the process. This article examines how Haitian vessels have emerged as metonyms of Haitian subjectivity within three discourses: US journalistic and security accounts concerned with Haitian migration by sea, North American sailing connoisseurs’ specialized “boat talk,” and Haitian mariners’ informal communications about sailing and boat building. By juxtaposing these discourses, I reveal a set of aesthetic regimes that authorize a range of material effects, including US migration policing at sea but also Haitian attempts to create enduring maritime worlds. While various actors point to socioculturally coded ensembles of material qualities to evaluate Haitian vessels, their assessments also depend on the directional movement and location of the entities they evaluate. I suggest, then, that such evaluations should be understood as kinetico-spatial in orientation. In attending to kinetico-spatial aesthetic evaluations and their racializing effects, anthropologists can illuminate the material entailments, the erasures, and the forms of life such interpretive orders render thinkable and unthinkable.","PeriodicalId":48343,"journal":{"name":"Current Anthropology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/724725","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the 1960s, thousands of Haitians have boarded wooden sailing vessels in attempts to reach the United States. Commentators have long conflated the perceived characteristics of Haitians making this journey with the material qualities of the vessels they use, creating the racialized archetype of the “boat person” in the process. This article examines how Haitian vessels have emerged as metonyms of Haitian subjectivity within three discourses: US journalistic and security accounts concerned with Haitian migration by sea, North American sailing connoisseurs’ specialized “boat talk,” and Haitian mariners’ informal communications about sailing and boat building. By juxtaposing these discourses, I reveal a set of aesthetic regimes that authorize a range of material effects, including US migration policing at sea but also Haitian attempts to create enduring maritime worlds. While various actors point to socioculturally coded ensembles of material qualities to evaluate Haitian vessels, their assessments also depend on the directional movement and location of the entities they evaluate. I suggest, then, that such evaluations should be understood as kinetico-spatial in orientation. In attending to kinetico-spatial aesthetic evaluations and their racializing effects, anthropologists can illuminate the material entailments, the erasures, and the forms of life such interpretive orders render thinkable and unthinkable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Racializing美学
自20世纪60年代以来,成千上万的海地人登上木制帆船试图抵达美国。长期以来,评论家们一直将海地人的特征与他们使用的船只的材料质量混为一谈,在此过程中创造了“船民”的种族化原型。本文考察了海地船只如何在三种话语中成为海地主体性的转义:与海地海上移民有关的美国新闻和安全报道,北美帆船鉴赏家的专业“船语”,以及海地水手关于帆船和造船的非正式交流。通过并列这些话语,我揭示了一套美学制度,这些制度授权了一系列物质影响,包括美国在海上的移民政策,以及海地试图创造持久的海洋世界。虽然不同的参与者指出社会文化编码的材料质量组合来评估海地船只,但他们的评估也取决于他们评估的实体的方向运动和位置。因此,我建议,这种评价应该被理解为方向上的动力学空间。在关注动态空间美学评价及其种族化效果的过程中,人类学家可以阐明这种解释秩序所赋予的可想象和不可想象的物质内涵、抹除和生活形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Anthropology
Current Anthropology ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Current Anthropology is a transnational journal devoted to research on humankind, encompassing the full range of anthropological scholarship on human cultures and on the human and other primate species. Communicating across the subfields, the journal features papers in a wide variety of areas, including social, cultural, and physical anthropology as well as ethnology and ethnohistory, archaeology and prehistory, folklore, and linguistics.
期刊最新文献
Why Do Humans Hunt Cooperatively? Dreams of a Transcultural Chamorro How to Analyze Your Data without Lying about God Ontologies and Worlds Between Guerrilla Warfare and Media Warfare
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1