Drought resistance does not explain epiphytic abundance of accidental epiphytes

IF 1.7 4区 生物学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES Plant Ecology & Diversity Pub Date : 2020-03-03 DOI:10.1080/17550874.2020.1729888
Vincent Hoeber, Moritz Klinghardt, G. Zotz
{"title":"Drought resistance does not explain epiphytic abundance of accidental epiphytes","authors":"Vincent Hoeber, Moritz Klinghardt, G. Zotz","doi":"10.1080/17550874.2020.1729888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background Accidental epiphytism is common among vascular plants in forest ecosystems around the globe. A frequent observation in surveys of accidental epiphytes is the occurrence of few species with high epiphytic abundance, while most co-occurring terrestrial species are rarely found as epiphytes. Aims Based on the general assumption that water is the major limiting factor for epiphytic plants, we hypothesised that differences in drought resistance of accidental epiphytes explain the difference in epiphytic abundances. Methods We exposed 16 species with different epiphytic abundance in central Europe to experimentally induced drought during germination and growth of juvenile plants. Results Drought resistance differed substantially among species but did not correlate with their epiphytic abundance, neither during germination nor during juvenile growth. Conclusions In central Europe, accidental epiphytes are usually found on moss cushions or in accumulated arboreal soil on their host tree. In such water-storing substrates, water availability might be less limiting than it is for obligate epiphytes that typically grow on bare bark, which would explain the lack of a correlation between drought resistance and epiphytic abundance of the studied species. Hence, other factors must explain the consistent differences in epiphytic abundance, e.g. dispersal traits and mass effect.","PeriodicalId":49691,"journal":{"name":"Plant Ecology & Diversity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17550874.2020.1729888","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Ecology & Diversity","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2020.1729888","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Accidental epiphytism is common among vascular plants in forest ecosystems around the globe. A frequent observation in surveys of accidental epiphytes is the occurrence of few species with high epiphytic abundance, while most co-occurring terrestrial species are rarely found as epiphytes. Aims Based on the general assumption that water is the major limiting factor for epiphytic plants, we hypothesised that differences in drought resistance of accidental epiphytes explain the difference in epiphytic abundances. Methods We exposed 16 species with different epiphytic abundance in central Europe to experimentally induced drought during germination and growth of juvenile plants. Results Drought resistance differed substantially among species but did not correlate with their epiphytic abundance, neither during germination nor during juvenile growth. Conclusions In central Europe, accidental epiphytes are usually found on moss cushions or in accumulated arboreal soil on their host tree. In such water-storing substrates, water availability might be less limiting than it is for obligate epiphytes that typically grow on bare bark, which would explain the lack of a correlation between drought resistance and epiphytic abundance of the studied species. Hence, other factors must explain the consistent differences in epiphytic abundance, e.g. dispersal traits and mass effect.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗旱性不能解释偶然附生植物的丰度
摘要背景在全球森林生态系统中,意外附生在维管植物中很常见。在偶然附生植物调查中,经常观察到少数附生植物丰度高的物种出现,而大多数共存的陆地物种很少作为附生植物出现。基于水分是附生植物的主要限制因素这一普遍假设,我们假设偶然附生植物抗旱性的差异可以解释附生植物丰度的差异。方法将中欧16种不同附生植物丰度的植物在幼株萌发和生长过程中暴露于实验诱导的干旱中。结果不同物种的抗旱性差异很大,但与附生植物的丰度无关,无论是在萌芽期还是在幼期。结论在中欧,偶然附生植物通常出现在寄主树的苔藓垫或堆积的树木土壤中。在这样的储水基质中,与通常生长在裸树皮上的专性附生植物相比,水的可利用性可能没有那么有限,这将解释所研究物种的抗旱性和附生植物丰度之间缺乏相关性的原因。因此,其他因素必须解释附生植物丰度的一致差异,例如扩散特征和群体效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Plant Ecology & Diversity
Plant Ecology & Diversity PLANT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Plant Ecology and Diversity is an international journal for communicating results and novel ideas in plant science, in print and on-line, six times a year. All areas of plant biology relating to ecology, evolution and diversity are of interest, including those which explicitly deal with today''s highly topical themes, such as biodiversity, conservation and global change. We consider submissions that address fundamental questions which are pertinent to contemporary plant science. Articles concerning extreme environments world-wide are particularly welcome. Plant Ecology and Diversity considers for publication original research articles, short communications, reviews, and scientific correspondence that explore thought-provoking ideas. To aid redressing ‘publication bias’ the journal is unique in reporting, in the form of short communications, ‘negative results’ and ‘repeat experiments’ that test ecological theories experimentally, in theoretically flawless and methodologically sound papers. Research reviews and method papers, are also encouraged. Plant Ecology & Diversity publishes high-quality and topical research that demonstrates solid scholarship. As such, the journal does not publish purely descriptive papers. Submissions are required to focus on research topics that are broad in their scope and thus provide new insights and contribute to theory. The original research should address clear hypotheses that test theory or questions and offer new insights on topics of interest to an international readership.
期刊最新文献
Relationship between plant diversity and community stability and invasibility in the heterogeneous landscape of urban habitats undergoing Solidago canadensis invasion Calluna vulgaris volatile emissions suggest varying anti-herbivore defence strategies with plant ontogeny Multiple global change factors cause declines of a temperate bryophyte Rethinking the relationship between desiccation-tolerant vascular plants and water deficit Occurrence of preanthesis cleistogamy in Richardia brasiliensis suggests it may be more common in Rubiaceae than realised
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1